PDA

View Full Version : DDR in "Germany and the Germans"


Daniel Shays
09-02-2006, 06:27 AM
A very decent book by John Ardagh, Anglo-Jewish Francophile turned German enthusiast in the mid eighties. It reads like one part diary one part in depth reporting as he obtained interviews with major politicians, artistic personalities, and other high profile people of "Germany": West Germany to him, the East is always abbreviated to GDR and although it is only given one chapter of its own, it is substantial and multi-faceted. Below I transcribe the first segment of highlights. Unfortunately for the "Oxford man" Ardagh (who met his German wife, Katinka while touring Germany for 10 months for this book), typos abound and I have preserved them.

Ardagh, John. Germany and the Germans. New York, N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1987. 319-326.

On East Berlin:
“Where the Unter den Linden avenue sweeps up to the wide Marx-Engels-Platz, heart of the modern city, several of the old majestic buildings including the State Opera House, the Pergamon Museum and the Protestant Cathedral have been meticulously restored to their original form. And beside them several massive new edifices stand as symbols of the GDR’s assertive ambitions as a modern state – notably the towering white rectangle of the Foreign Ministry, and the Palace of the Republic with its gleaming façade of bronze-coloured glass. This part of the city is grandiose to say the least – severe looking, but tidy. There are plenty of grey uniformed police around, ready to shout at any visitor who jay-walks, and maybe to fine him; and often there are soldiers too. The first time that I saw the steel-helmeted, goose-stepping changing-of-the-guard outside the Memorial to the Victims of Fascism and Militarism, it evoked memories that gave me a nasty frisson, How crassly tactless to present this sight to tourists in the Under (sic – gassedarbeiter) den Linden. The goose-step is still widely used in the GDR’s Army, and it serves to symbolize the fact that militarism in this half of Germany did not die with Hitler in the bunker.

At the nearby Alexanderplatz the scene is more gentle. This vast modern piazza, enclosed by new department stores and skyscraper hotels, is now the main shopping and entertainment centre of East Berlin and something of a showpiece too, pleasant and lively in its way, with music playing, a fountain splashing, and a curious ‘international clock’ used as a meeting-place like Eros at Piccadilly Circus. The crowds seem to be relaxed and good-humoured, and are quite well dressed too in a classless sort of way.



Eastwards from here stretches the long and pompous Karl-Marx-Allee: its giant blocks of workers’ flats where (sic- Gassedarbeiter) built in the 1950s in a Stalinist-brutalist style and the street was then the Stalin-Allee. At least the sheer size of these buildings balances the great width of the street, giving it a Champs-Élysées -like scale. It is not exactly ablaze with Parisian glitter: yet, as in other parts of the city, the buildings are often festooned with red bunting, flags and banners, and slogans in the genre of ‘Socialism Cares for the Happiness of the People’ and ‘Actively we Support the Peace Policy of the Beloved Soviet Union’.


Everyone drives at a vigilant 100kph maximum, for the police are quick to impose a fine if you faster; and if you are found to have been drinking alcohol, even a small amount, the penalties are stiff. In the GDR, even more than in West Germany, rules are there to be obeyed.

On Leipzig:


In the old squares and side-streets around the Thomaskirche, where J.S. Bach was organist, we found cosy little privately-run cafés and tearooms whispering the last enchantments of some pre-war Central European Gemütlichkeit and frequented by gentle-looking student couples and civilized elderly music-lovers.



Then from Leipzig we drove to Weimar, where Goethe’s residence and garden-house and park where he walked have all been devotedly preserved, as have the houses associated with Schiller, Liszt, and Bach. The town gets its fill of tourists but it has not been commercially tarted up in the process as would happen in the West: it remains much as it probably was before the war, a quiet, slightly seedy little place with half-timbered houses, and its melancholy air goes well with its many poetic memories. The surrounding villages of the Thuringian and Saxon countryside also retains the fell of pre-war days: far fewer of their houses have been pulled down or modernised than in the Federal Republic.

On Prussianism:

Westerners with long memories who visit the GDR will often make the observation that in many respects it has preserved the old pre-war flavour of Germany much more than the West has done. The tempo of life is slower and modernism has made a less obvious impact; the little shops and the styles of graphic design are more antiquated, the cars are smaller and less ubiquitous, and many streets are still cobbled. How far these are advantages is open to question. And there are Other things that have changed less too – old-style Prussian authoritarianism, for example, is more alive and well under Communism than it is in the Bundesrepublik.

On June 7th Fascist Revolt

Much has been argued and written since – mainly in the West – about this historic ‘June 7 Revolt’, the first of its kind in post-war Communist Europe. In the eyes of many cold warriors, its suppression was a typical example of Soviet brutality. Others more sympathetic to socialism will point out – not quite unfairly – that the Russian fire-power was in fact used sparingly, that the death toll was low in the circumstances, and that anyway the strike was already fizzling out of its own accord for it had no future. It could also be added, more controversially, that some of the strike instigators were rabid anti-Communists such as ex-Wehrmacht officers and former pro-Nazi teachers who had been drafted into manual labour after 1945.

On economy (part I)

One undoubted achievement of the GDR, dating from the 1960s, has been its economic progress. Capitalist West Germany of course is far wealthier: but the more valuable comparisons are to be made with the East. The GDR is economically and industrially much the strongest country in the Soviet Bloc, with living standards an estimated 50 percent higher than in Russia, and by as early as 1970 it had become the world’s tenth leading industrial power. This can be attributed above all to the innate German qualities of efficiency, thoroughness, technical flair and so on. And the achievement appears especially remarkable when set in the context of the enormous handicaps that the country had to face at the outset, the heaviest of them being Soviet reparations. In contrast to the very light amount of dismantling carried out by the Allies in the West, and soon outweighed by Marshall Aid

Berianidze
09-02-2006, 01:07 PM
Excellent post comrade.

My mother being an ethnic German, we spent some time in the GDR when I was still young. I remember mostly the areas of East Berlin...but I do recall having been to Leipzig. In fact, I'm supposed to go to Leipzig sometime in the near future for a study-abroad program.

Hakluyt
09-02-2006, 02:33 PM
On Prussianism:

Didn't the DDR renounce all claims to stolen Prussian territory immediately following the war, while the BRD held them until late in the 70s?

Daniel Shays
09-03-2006, 04:12 AM
Didn't the DDR renounce all claims to stolen Prussian territory immediately following the war, while the BRD held them until late in the 70s? It was not and could not ever be official BRD policy, they merely tolerated the Heimat groups and many trizonian politicians pretended they had the power to adjust those borders during campaigns and blamed the GDR for preventing it when in actuality they were restricted by the Yalta and Potsdam declarations just the same as East Germany. They could not be so flagrantly violated as to realize a German expansion in those times. So basically, the GDR just lacked the kitschy posturing of its western neighbor, which had fallen so low only to remain dominated by Imperialist types... turned toothless offal slurping lackeys of "the West", the Bananenrepublik Deutschland was from its infernal hatching the Oreb of Judah, a carrion bird of Anglo-American enterprise.

A German reclamation of the 2/3's of what was once Prussia now in possession of Poland can only be achieved in response to Polish aggression / disturbance. I deeply lament the lost opportunity of the early 80's when the militaries of the USSR and GDR could have laid waste to 'Poland' with a solid pretext - just as the USA/England would to a Western European country that opted for Communism.

Anima Eternae
09-03-2006, 05:47 AM
I had a feeling this was not going to be referring to what I thought...


http://www.anime-source.com/banzai/modules/Forums/images/avatars/Animated/DDR.gif

Berianidze
09-03-2006, 09:05 AM
I had a feeling this was not going to be referring to what I thought...


http://www.anime-source.com/banzai/modules/Forums/images/avatars/Animated/DDR.gif
What is that? And how does that refer to the German Democratic Republic?

Edit: Nevermind, I got it..."DDR" as in Dance, Dance Revolution....

Daniel Shays
09-11-2006, 03:52 AM
Ibid. 326-328.

On economy (part II)

It's dismantling reduced East Germany's industrial capacity by an estimated 40 to 45 per cent, equal to twice the damage done by the war. At first the Russians transported whole plants to their country, for re-assembly there: but when they found this was not very efficient, they chose instead to expropriate the output of East German factories, without compensation, and this pillage amounted to an average of 25 per cent GNP within 1945 and 1953. But then the Soviet Union changed its policy within the context of Comecon, the Eastern bloc's newly-created economic planning system, it decided to oblige each member state to specialise: and the GDR was allotted the role of supplying precision instruments, machine tools and other complex machinery, and some chemical products. Direct reparations were discontinued

(. . .)

The GDR has faced other economic handicaps too. It has few mineral resources of its own, apart from some lignite and potash; more over, in 1945 it inherited the least industrialized part of pre-war Germany which in 1939 was producing only 7 per cent of its steel and 2 percent of its hard coal.

(. . .)

In early post-war years some 10,000 businesses were nationalised, including all those of any size in industry and commerce. Today some thousands of small private concerns are still permitted, mostly in crafts and the service sector, but they are marginal to the economy as a whole. The main factories have been regrouped into combines (Kombinate), each of which has its production levels, its prices and its distribution outlets fixed for it in advance by various State planning bodies within the context of the overall five- and seven-year plans.

(. . .)

Collectivised agriculture, like industry, has improved after a difficult start and is now considerably more efficient than in Russia or most other Soviet bloc countries. Directly after the war, all holdings of more than 250 acres were confiscated without compensation from the wealthy land-owning Junker class, and most of this land was redistributed to farm workers, peasants and refugees. Massive collectivisation did not follow till a few years later [...] today 95 percent of the land is farmed by cooperatives, numbering 82% of all farmers. This is large scale industrial farming, well mechanised. [...] Above all the Party collectivisers were sensible enough to allow members of the cooperatives to retain private ownership of enough livestock and farmland (1.2 acres) to meet their own needs