Are you a Nordicist?

[Ixtab]

Are you a Nordicist?

[joon]

Most definitely am.

[Sinclair]

Nope. Greece and Italy are heavily responsible for European success.

[Atlas]

It's a tough call.

I think I am but that doesn't means I hate southern Europeans who are a bit darker. I just wouldn't mix with them. As sinclair said they helped us a lot to built up Europe so no point to hate them. Although theres a big difference between southern Italians who are almost Germanic type and southern, who are darker, or even very dark ( sicily ).

Theres a big hipocrizy amongst some White Racialist who claim that Portuguese are White though.

[Ixtab]

Nope. Greece and Italy are heavily responsible for European success.Greece, and certainly not Rome. Intellectually, Europe owes more to the Islam Empire (a much more efficient empire, by the way) than it does to Rome. The Roman empire was a monstrous disease and wrecker of splendid possibilities, which thankfully perished. Europe does owe a lot to later Italy, though.

[Hakluyt]

Atlas: as a Frenchman, how would you classify the guy on the right in your sig, "Mediterranean French" or a mixture of some sort? He is a very common type I see a lot of in Quebec.

[Berianidze]

Nope, not at all.

[Atlas]

Atlas: as a Frenchman, how would you classify the guy on the right in your sig, "Mediterranean French" or a mixture of some sort? He is a very common type I see a lot of in Quebec.

These are two persons from a german TV show. Just don't mind my sig, you know, even the chick I use as an avatar ain't really nordicist. But I remember someone using a black chick as a sig and no ones said anything about it.

[Ixtab]

how would you classify the guy on the right in your sig, "Mediterranean French"
These are two persons from a german TV show.The Germans and the French are racially identical anyway, are they not?

[Billy Score]

As an aryan nordic superman myself, i see it as common sense to defend my nordic heritage.

[The Retard]

In a perfect world everyone would have blonde hair and blue eyes.

[Jimbo Gomez]

As an aryan nordic superman myself, i see it as common sense to defend my nordic heritage.

But I thought you were a swarthy halfblood.

[Excorcism]

The Germans and the French are racially identical anyway, are they not?

I remember studying the French being of Celtic descent and the Germans belonging to the Germanic tribes. Still, they both originated from the original Indo-European land and theory goes

[Billy Score]

But I thought you were a swarthy halfblood.
Counterrevolutionary lies. I am white as the snow on the Skanderma

[Ixtab]

I remember studying the French being of Celtic descent and the Germans belonging to the Germanic tribes. Still, they both originated from the original Indo-European land and theory goesBoth the Germans and the French are descendants of the Franks. As I take it, one section of the Franks, the Western section, the Neustrasians, -- the modern-day 'French' -- were Latinised by the Roman empire, or rather learned to speak the corrupt Latin of the subject populations, and this evolved into modern-day French; the unconquered Western section, the Austrasians, remained Germanised linguistically, and became modern-day Germans. After the fall of the Roman Empire they reunited, but owing largely to linguistic differences they presently divided again. The differences between Germans and French have beens always linguistic, not racial. The language of the Western Franks must have been very much like that of the Germans, or Eastern Franks, before the former was Latinised by the Romans. Racially, again, I don't see how they are at all distinct.

[The_Baddest_Seed]

Yes, I think that the White population needs to be refined into a Nordic population. The Nordic Race is the Master Race. However it is exceeded in some respects by the Armenid race. The Armenid race is ugly and has dissipated into strains amongst other races. Some might say that an Armenid/Nordid mix (the mix of the Jewish upper class) is superior. I should like, as a secondary project, to see the Armenid race resurrected too.

A case can be made that a Nordic overclass ruling over Nordic/other White blends is the optimum for an industrial high-technology society but in the long run Nordicisation is preferable I believe.

[Niko Bellic]

I'm too lazy to split racial hairs like this.

[brigadier Biggles]

I'm not a Nordicist, as no sane person makes a racial type their ideology, my family are very Northern looking though with all of us having light eyes and either blonde or brown hair, most Nordicists ive seen off on the web arent even remotely Nordic looking.

but i'd like to see more awareness of the indo european types in schools etc, mention Halstatt Nordic to someone and they think its a Swedish football team.

[Excorcism]

I'm too lazy to split racial hairs like this.

lol, same here

[Billy Score]

Good, go "make babies" with a Negress.

BTW,

Your avatar and signature would have been provocative up until the mid 1960's, you're just a typical boring pc Stalinist, I still have a Stalinist shirt from when I was learning Cyrillic, I don't wear it anymore as I have grownup but I am sure you know nothing of Russian culture or language.

You're just an infantilized Commie wannabe. :D

What about my sig :D

[Billy Score]

I believe Freud would classify your fondness for crude garbage as anal expulsive.

Luckily he's been discredited so I can just call you a moron without being contradicted.
Sig material
-recommendations coming your way.

[Hakluyt]

Since when are Stalinists PC?? I don't see that any form of communism is considered politically correct, but if any does approach that status I'd think it closer to the trockist model

[Billy Score]

Since when are Stalinists PC?? I don't see that any form of communism is considered politically correct, but if any does approach that status I'd think it closer to the trockist model
Yes, clearly. I notice that most "marxists" these days are of that brand, or infact, are liberal pacifists whose ideal world is one where drugs are legal, sexuality is pushed on 4 year olds, and che's image is on everything from t shirts to condoms to moneyclips.

Infact i do not even wear che shirts anylonger because of the above association. This and the association of bolshevism with judaism. I certainlely do not have anything but contempt for judaism and do not wish to be associated with it. The "marxists" of today would have been dragged into a gulag by the Bolsheviks of yesterday relatively quickly.

[Ixtab]

Your avatar and signature would have been provocative up until the mid 1960's, ...H'm, knowing Rice, I don't think provocativeness is his intention in his choice of avatar, but rather an expression of his political allegiance, whom and what he identifies with, and so on; nor does provocativeness seem to be the motivation of the vast majority of card-carrying members of communist parties (most of whom, globally, are supporters of Stalin) in their choice of ideology. No, right earnest men have never lived by, and died by, that superficial outward seeming of allegiance and belief which is part and parcel with mere provocativeness.

... you're just a typical boring pc Stalinist, ...He is not a 'Stalinist'. Such a thing as 'Stalinism' does not exist. It is a mockterm merely; nothing more nor less. No one calls himself a 'Stalinist'. Rice, as I take him, is a Marxist-Leninist - what kind I cannot tell you, although I believe he was a member of the revisionist PLP for some time.

I still have a Stalinist shirt from when I was learning Cyrillic, I don't wear it anymore as I have grownup but I am sure you know nothing of Russian culture or language.He is Russian himself, I think. That, or Georgian. I forget. One of the two.

Stalin is kitsch, face it.Maybe so, but that would only concern me insofar as 'Stalinism' is a fashion-statement - which, I find, is just as often and not often the case as it is among people of any other political allegiance whatsoever. Nowhere and at no time have people lived by that which they only affected to believe, especially right earnest people like Rice. It is the rices of the world that rivet my attention. Beautiful people; deep-seeing light-bringers truly, and it satisfies me a commie very much to think often of such people, and to reflect that I, too, am a commie.

[Niko Bellic]

I believe Freud would classify your fondness for crude garbage as anal expulsive.

Luckily he's been discredited so I can just call you a moron without being contradicted.

There are many things I could call Mazdak that would be true, I don't think moron or anal expulsive are among them. If he was more anal expulsive I'd have a higher opinion of him.:D

[Ixtab]

If I question how many people Stalin killed....

I won't be abducted from my home at night and detained in solitary confinement in a desert tundra wasteland (Canada),then sent to Germany to await a secret tribunal for my thought crime.And what a shame that is! Question how many people Stalin killed? Yet there is so much that is questioned among mainstream historians alone, never mind we Commies: far from a 'settled case' is the extent of his excesses; since the opening of the Soviet Archives especially, which have thrown considerable doubt upon the traditional cold-war version of Stalinist history. Your view is no longer the mainstream view. It has become totally outmoded and antiquated as new information has been made available to us. Why, just read a history book. Tauger and Getty, both highly respected in their fields, and Wheatcroft - a right respected researcher on the 'Ukrainian' famine - would be good starts for you.
There is no analogy between the historical view on the crimes of Stalinism and that on the crimes of Nazism: that latter is very much a settled case among 'qualified authorities'. I have my doubts about the crimes of Nazism as well, and it is very unfortunate indeed that scepticism of the Holocaust is a punishable offence in some countries; but there is no likeness at all between historians' surety of Stalin's crimes and that of Hitler's crimes. It isn't even revisionism in the case of Stalin's. And who do the Holocaust revisionists have? That mendacious charlatan, Irving, and his ilk? Well, we have Tauger, Getty, Wheatcroft, and many other anti-Stalinist historians who are debunking from here to Kingdom Come many of Stalin's "atrocities" - all very mainstream stuff, actually.

[Billy Score]

There are many things I could call Mazdak that would be true, I don't think moron or anal expulsive are among them. If he was more anal expulsive I'd have a higher opinion of him.:D

Rice is georgian. Born there, even, i believe.

And ugly american, you dress like a fairy. literally (you'll never live this one down, i don't even have to do a photoshop to mock you).

[Berianidze]

Good, go "make babies" with a Negress.

BTW,

Your avatar and signature would have been provocative up until the mid 1960's, you're just a typical boring pc Stalinist, I still have a Stalinist shirt from when I was learning Cyrillic, I don't wear it anymore as I have grownup but I am sure you know nothing of Russian culture or language.

You're just an infantilized Commie wannabe. :D

Firstly, it appears you were 'offended' in some way or another in regards to my response as to whether or not I was a nordicist (unless I've done something else to evoke your attack please inform me otherwise:rolleyes: ), as someone with no ties to the Nordic people/culture why would I consider myself one? If you think I said 'no' out of sheer contempt for the Nordic people you are quite wrong, as I have much respect for them and their historical contributions.

Secondly, (why we're having a discussion over the use of an avatar/sig I do not quite understand but I'll go with it) if I merely wanted to convey a provactive presence here at the phora, I could've done a lot better than a simple picture of Stalin in his exile as my avatar...like for instance, a famous poster in which a Red Army infantryman is towering over a rodent-like Hitler on his knees, cowering at the end of the soldier's bayonet. No, I have no means of trying to provoke anybody, but to simply discuss/post in peace. If you feel it is provocative then so be it, but I don't conduct myself based on the judgments (particularly those of the misinformed and unfounded) of others.

Thirdly, when you use the term 'stalinist' you've lost my interest due to your implication that the philosophies of Stalin were in fact distinguishable from Marxism-Leninism, and this is simply untrue. Ixabert addressed this before, and I see no point in reiterating his arguments, but rather simply solidifying his case by addressing this misconception that 'stalinism' is in fact a separate entity from Marxism-Leninism.

Finally, where you arrived at the conclusion I'm PC is beyond me, but I have a feeling those who know me in real life or have witnessed my posts from previous forums would unanimously agree that I'm quite far from politically correct.

BTW, Ixabert hit the nail right on the head in assessing my reasons for my choice in avatar, my political allegience as well as my deep respect for someone whom is considered a national hero to many of my countrymen --as Mazdak correctly pointed out, I was born in Georgia and moved with my family to the United States in 1990 at the age of 6.

And my knowledge of Russian culture and language? I would consider myself somewhat knowledgeable of such things, in regards to the latter I'm far from proficient. In the future if you'd like to address issues with me you can simply use the PM function rather than wasting space/time in a formal thread.

[Ixtab]

However, I must agree with Counter Semite on one thing: Mazdak's signature. I've always found it a bit annoying, to be honest - although I think that might have been Mazdak's intention.

[Felix the Cat]

I could've done a lot better than a simple picture of Stalin in his exile as my avatar...like for instance, a famous poster in which a Red Army infantryman is towering over a rodent-like Hitler on his knees, cowering at the end of the soldier's bayonet.
Link or post please

[Joe McCarthy]

I suppose it depends on how one defines 'Nordicist'. Most or all of the old racial theorists and ethnologists, from Rosenberg to Chamberlain, were hardcore Nordicists in the sense that they believed Nordics (or in Chamberlain's terminology, "Teutons") are the vanguard of civilization. My own view relies less on this conventional standard and more on a sort of aesthetic 'blondism', for even the 'Mediterranean' Greeks valued their physical features in that they were the colors of the heavens; blue eyes for the sky; white skin for the clouds; and blonde hair for the sun. Although one can argue that such a value judgment is subjective, I think it is certain that the blonde Aryan female is the zenith in aesthetics, even if her value in birthing the 'Master Race' is debatable.

[Jimbo Gomez]

Hmm, those women are hot yes, but I have to say an attractive Italian lady appeals at least equally to me. I define nordicism and medicism in terms of survival of that subrace, so I can say in all honesty that I am both a nordicist and a medicist.

[Joe McCarthy]

Which part of Italy specifically? The northern part is more Germanic. In fact, there are still German linguistic communities in Italy, and Dante, an Italian, was claimed as a 'German' by the Nazis. I do hope you're not hot for the mongrel refuse of the southern regions, for with the exception of the Viking interlude, they are almost exclusively descended from the chaos of the levant that was foolishly allowed in to mix with the Romans during Rome's decline.

[Jimbo Gomez]

I like meds, not moors ;).

I hope that answers your question. Sicilians don't do it for me. I don't consider the northern Italians to be germanics, but they do of course have a good deal of germanic bloof in them.

[Billy Score]

However, I must agree with Counter Semite on one thing: Mazdak's signature. I've always found it a bit annoying, to be honest - although I think that might have been Mazdak's intention.

It is. I don't know how to use photoshop and know that if i tried the image would come out moronic anyway, so why try making a "cool" sig.

[Ixtab]

Because Stalin's not accused of killing six million JEWS, only 20-30+ million Goyim.There are, as I take it, three reasons for this:
(1)The insane level of communal victimhood which is the very cornerstone of modern Jewish identity;
(2)Hitler's crimes are considered well established facts, because they are said to rest upon eye-witnesses, operators of concentration camps, surviving victims, upon certain records most meticoulously maintained by the National Socialists themselves, on "mountains" of human bodies that were bulldozed and turned into mass tombs, upon population registers, and so forth;
(3)The perceived political stance of most so-called 'Holocaust deniers'--that, I think, is the most essential point.

With Stalin's atrocities:

(1)Nothing similar to 1.
(2)Many of Stalin's atrocities are mere accusations which are unsupported by modern research in the Soviet Archives and elsewhere. The opening of the Soviet Archives has shed a lot of light on the true extent of Stalin's 'crimes', especially so far forth as Famine Research is concerned. Nothing similar has happened since WWII as regards Holocaust research, as far as I know.
(3)The political stance of the vast majority of people who are debunking this nonsense, who have access to the Soviet Archives, are ANTI-STALINISTS. If such historians were believed to have ties to 'Stalinist' political parties, and were thought to be trying to revive 'Stalinism', they would no doubt, just like the Holocaust revisionists, be unjustly discredited without regard to the cogency of their arguments. But that is not the case. Holocaust revisionists are often not allowed to voice their opinions because, rightly or wrongly, they are considered to be Nazi REVIVALISTS.

[daisy]

are you a nordicist? no i am a white albino. last time i said that one person stalked me on a forum for 5 months just to make fun of me by putting crazy albino pictures and insults up after most of my post. i type most of my post in small letters because capital letters hurt my photophobia eyes.

[Jonathan]

No, I'm not a Nordicist. I also find the notion of the Nordic "super race", or whatever you want to call it, to be complete rubbish (incase anyone carred).:)

Both the Germans and the French are descendants of the Franks.
That's incorrect too. The Frankish invasion was not numerically sufficient to replace the pre-Frankish inhabitants(not to mention the invasion of the Vandals, Suavi, Bergundians etc). Whatever the make-up of pre-Frankish Gaul was(Cro-Magnons, Meds., Basques, Aquitanii, Belgii, Gauls etc) that's what the French are(with the exceptions of small strands of Franks, Bergundians, Normans, Bretons etc). I pressume we're not including more recent immigrants.

[Ixtab]

What do you mean incorrect "too"? You never corrected a "first" thing.

What I meant was, both the indigenous Germans and the French are descendents of essentially the same peoples that lived under the Frankish kingdoms (and before), which are collectively called the franks in virtue of living under those kingdoms. Only one half was Latinised. The difference between the French and Germans are primarily linguistic. There may also be a slight difference in the ratio of Alpine and Nordic peoples occupying France of Germany, but that is it, and doesn't mean anything in this connexion (and there are more meds in France, as well).

[Jonathan]

What do you mean incorrect "too"?
1)The superiority of "Nordics".
2)The Ancestors of the French and Germans were Franks.

You never corrected a "first" thing.
I needn't correct it for it to be wrong.

What I meant was, both the indigenous Germans and the French are descendents of essentially the same peoples that lived under the Frankish kingdoms (and before), which are collectively called the franks in virtue of living under those kingdoms.
You didn't make that very clear when you said:

Both the Germans and the French are descendants of the Franks

Not to mention the fact that Germany has considerable populations of Almans, Saxons, Alans etc etc. which are absent in France and were identified as such even during the Frankish period which you have brought up.

There may also be a slight difference in the ratio of Alpine and Nordic peoples occupying France of Germany, but that is it, and doesn't mean anything in this connexion.
Why not?

[Ixtab]

Not to mention the fact that Germany has considerable populations of Almans, Saxons, Alans etc etc.Both were a mishmash of mostly Germanic peoples -- who were almost exactly the same besides their differences in language.

Why not?Common sense, which I will not explain to you. It is too self-obvious.

[Jonathan]

Both were a mishmash of mostly Germanic peoples -- who were almost exactly the same besides their differences in language.
Where is your evidence of this? I've already said that the invasion of Roman Gaul was numerically insufficient to replace the pre-Germanic population - So no, both were not a mishmash of mostly Germanic peoples (linguistically, or genetically). Your going back over your own words. There isn't much shame in admitting that you are wrong.

Common sense, which I will not explain to you. It is too self-obvious.
The original discussion was whether the French and the Germans were descendants of the same people. Therefore the ratio of Nordic people to Alpine people is of the utmost relevance. So your wrong to say that it doesn't mean anything in this connexion, and what's more, you wont even defend your position (not to mention admitt your mistake).

[Ixtab]

Where is your evidence of this? I've already said that the invasion of Roman Gaul was numerically insufficient to replace the pre-Germanic populationI never said anything which, if true, would require that as a condition.

Germanic peoples (linguistically, or genetically).There is no such thing as "genetically Germanic" peoples.

There isn't much shame in admitting that you are wrong.I haven't changed my view on anything. There isn't much shame in admitting that you are wrong, and you are quite clearly wrong if you disagree with me on this.

So your wrong to say that it doesn't mean anything in this connexion, and what's more, you wont even defend your position (not to mention admitt your mistake).It doesn't mean anything, because Germans and French wouldn't then be racial entities. Now you have turned into a semantic obscrantist.

[Jonathan]

I never said anything which, if true, would require that as a condition.
Oh really?

1)Both the Germans and the French are descendants of the Franks

2)Both[French and Germans] were a mishmash of mostly Germanic peoples

Now I'll ask you again:
Where is your evidence to show that the modern populations of Germany and France are descendants of a mishmash of mostly Germanic peoples?

There is no such thing as "genetically Germanic" peoples.
Genetically i.e. "Through their genes" or "Through their descent from their ancestors". So yes, it would be perfectly correct of me to say that two peoples were not "genetically Germanic" in the sense that one/both of them was/were not descended from a Germanic people.

I haven't changed my view on anything.
First you say that the Germans and French are descendants of the Franks.
Then you qualify this by claiming that you ment "Franks" as in "Subjects of the Franksih kings".
Then you go on to say that the Germans and Franks are descendants of "a mix of Germanic peoples".

There isn't much shame in admitting that you are wrong, and you are quite clearly wrong if you disagree with me on this.
Disagree with you on what? That there is shame in admitting being wrong? or that the French and Germans are not descnedants of the same Germanic people?

It doesn't mean anything, because Germans and French wouldn't then be racial entities. Now you have turned into a semantic obscrantist.
I'm not breaking this down into semantics at all. I'm say that the ratio of Nordics to Alpines is relevant to a dscussion of the ancestry of the French and Germans - I'm also right :)

[Jonathan]

More from you:

1)The differences between Germans and French have beens always linguistic, not racial.

2)Racially, again, I don't see how they are at all distinct.

Can I ask you whether there racial affinities are through the Germanic peoples of the 5th century?

If so, can I ask you to back up this claim with any evidence you have at your disposal?

[Jaybird]

I'm not a nordicist in that I don't think meds aren't white or anything, but I hate dagos and I wouldn't want my sister bringing home some greaseball. On the other hand, I don't like Scandanavian fuckheads either (any good epithets for them?). I like limeys, micks, Scotsmen, bohunks, krauts, and polacks.

[Hakluyt]

(any good epithets for them?)
Fjord-Niggas

[Micaelis]

Yes I am a Nordicist.

The subtle facts are:

1. all Germans are Franks,
2. all Northern Italians are Germans
3. Dante was a German
4. the Ancient Greeks were blonde-haired, blue-eyed supermen
5. Sicilians are Arabic
6. Rome fell because of miscegenation
7. Ancient Egyptians were Nordic

True shit, mates.

[Micaelis]

I am patronising Ixabert's Nordicism. Actually, the Franks would be more properly defined as Germanic, for Germania is historically comprised of several tribes other than the Frank, as has been noted by yourself, I believe. Though the Frank is originary to Germania - with that interpretation I agree - I refuse to deify the Frank as German Man, unlike Ixabert. It is also accurate to state that population shifts in historical Germania encompass non-Germanic elements as well. But for the sake of our purism, we shouldn't like to point that out. The German is the Master Race: His Purity shouldn't be questioned!

The rest of the points demonstrate the stultifying effect of Nordicism on one's comprehension of the world. Rather than accept the blisteringly stupid dogma of Nordicism, one should see and observe the world for him/herself.

[Jaybird]

Fjord-Niggas
Ah yes, forgot that one...Edana I presume?

[Martin Kuklinski]

Most pure Nordic males are feminime. Well atleast in Holland.

Nordid-Alpinids 4 LIFE!

[Vindex]

Depends Iam for upward evolution of the White Race. Since the Gods are Nordic's and the Aryan is the children of the Gods, sure. But Iam not a fanatic about it like some seem to be, I wonder if the reason the later Doric invaders advanced so quick was because they took over a place that already had a high civilization. People forget the ancient Meds where a advanced people culture and civilization wise. But the strange thing is they looked like Nordics with black hair and brown eyes.

As for Hitler's crimes being dogma and Stalin's naughties treated different, I think it is because Hitler lost a war, where Stalin won a war. I must say Iam no fan of communism but I do have respect for Stalin.

[Hakluyt]

Ah yes, forgot that one...Edana I presume?
its mine as far as I know but I wouldn't be surprised at the possibility of multiple coinages.

[Ixtab]

2. all Northern Italians are Germans
4. the Ancient Greeks were blonde-haired, blue-eyed supermen
5. Sicilians are Arabic
6. Rome fell because of miscegenation
7. Ancient Egyptians were NordicClearly false.

And I am not a Nordicist.

[Sinclair]

its mine as far as I know but I wouldn't be surprised at the possibility of multiple coinages.

I've used it, having stolen it from the Onion.

[Hakluyt]

Fjord nigger
(Alaska) an Alaskan Native of the Tlingit tribe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs

Odd

[daisy]

Hakluyt thanks for the good link. i am a u.s. white albino.
albino rules! since i have been fighting for albinos.
they need to add albinism to the list of derogatory words.
everytime i search for albino humans on the internet albinism comes up instead so it is no wonder that everytime i say the word albino when talking about albino humans the only thing that seems to pop into some brains is albinism which i never talk about because to me white skin, nystagmus, and photophobia does not feel like albinism. it just means i know not to let the sun hurt my skin or let bright lights hurt my eyes.
to me that word albinism is an obstacle to overcome because too many people pride theirselves on telling me how smart or educated they are on albinism rather than realizing i am talking about albino humans not albinism.albino - u.s. whites and u.s. blacks
also a derogatory term for light skinned blacks
used by darker skinned blacks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slursthe word albino, derogative term or not? NOT
i see albino as a statement of fact, nothing more nothing less.
http://bianca.wolflan.com/viewtopic.php?t=2

[Jebivjetar]

I am dinaricist. :D

[Nordicist]

Yes, of course. I think that I always an instinctive Nordicist...even before I read de Gobineau, certainly before I was exposed to Houston Stewart Chamberlain.

[leondegrance]

No. I'm a nord/med mix. I don't believe there is any credible evidence that nord whites are superior to med whites. Nords have aesthetic value, as do med whites.

[-MarcoPolo-]

Is Stacy Keibler Nordic? If you look her up make sure you check out the photos that show off her legs. Anyways, no, i'm not a nordicist.

[OVERWATCH]

I used to be a nordicist.:o

[tricknologist]

Nordicist, did you used to post at VNNF as Nord Blod or something similar ?

[tricknologist]

As for the original question; no, I am not a nordicist since I'm not Nordic.

[LaundryBob]

Nordics are by far the most aesthetically appealing of all human subraces. All one has to do is open any magazine and look at the models to realize this.

[Kodos]

Europe owes more to the Islam Empire (a much more efficient empire, by the way) than it does to Rome.

Explain... Romans didn't like theoretical science they were good with technology though. Islam only worked scientifically when it wasn't all that Islamic and it depended mainly on conquered people to make their advances. Nor would the Germanic tribes who built up a new civilization from the ruins have been introduced to civilization without contact with Rome.

[Ahknaton]

I'm not a Nordicist because "Nordic" isn't an identity, it's an anthropological classification. Being a part of Western Civilisation is an identity, as is being "White" - especially in a non-European White majority country like Australia or America where most Whites are admixtures of several European racial subgroups. I identify as being Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, White, and Occidental, but not "Nordic' (if I even qualify).

"White" has a culturally meaningful analogue to the racial/biological element, i.e. the boundary of Western Civilisation. What does "Nordic" represent in a cultural context?

[jcs]

What does "Nordic" represent in a cultural context?
In any meaningful sense, it refers to Scandinavians. But the term is rarely used meaningfully.

[Die]

Hakluyt: fjord niggas

:D

[Member 198]

"What does "Nordic" represent in a cultural context?

Germanic culture, I'd imagine.

[Pablo Escobar]

I used to be a nordicist.:o

http://www.uprightcitizens.org/25/images/tattoo.jpg

[OVERWATCH]

pic of a fag

I don't know what this is supposed to mean, but I have the feeling that you should probably be negative repp'd for such a thing. :nono: :D

[Pablo Escobar]

I don't know what this is supposed to mean, but I have the feeling that you should probably be negative repp'd for such a thing. :nono: :D

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/4592/dave4pw5kx6sb.gif

[brigadier Biggles]

hey thats my gif awar :mad:

[Pablo Escobar]

hey thats my gif awar :mad:

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/4592/dave4pw5kx6sb.gif

[OVERWATCH]

Is that Davidowicz Lee Rothenberg?

[brigadier Biggles]

no its my great great grandfather at an after dinner party.

btw.....Nordics are aliens !.. http://aliens.monstrous.com/nordics.htm

[1-800]

Yes. I live in my great-hall, amongst my Viking brethren. ,

[Boleslaw]

No I am not a Nordicist. I do believe in preserving the sub-racial diversity of Europe, but Im not an absolute fanatic about.

And I certainly dont see whats so special about blond-haired, blue-eyed, Nords.

[Anima Eternae]

My school has a lot of blondes (though I do believe many are not real), and I swear they're no easier to tell apart than dark haired people.

[Die]

Gold hair is very beautiful, but then so is black and red and even brown!
Sunsilk softens :rofl:

Nordics, scandinavians, blondies, whatever they're called, are an amazing race-- but nordicists (at least our resident nordicist) are a perverted breed destined to die out.

[Janus]

Nordics, scandinavians, blondies, whatever they're called, are an amazing race-- but nordicists (at least our resident nordicist) are a perverted breed destined to die out.Never; I voted yes. :)

[Die]

That's extraordinarily conscientious of you. The only thing I voted for in this joint was the occult! :)

[Jimbo Gomez]

Hello there SB, Constantinus from the Phora here. Welcome. :)

[Janus]

Hello there SB, Constantinus from the Phora here. Welcome. :)
I followed the link in your farewell thread. Is FtB still around?That's extraordinarily conscientious of you. I do try. ;)

[Fade the Butcher]

I followed the link in your farewell thread. Is FtB still around? I do try. ;)

That would be me.

[Jimbo Gomez]

Sigurd posts here too, on occasion.

[brigadier Biggles]

hello southernboy :)

i'll always remember you as you know more about genetics/anthropology, than most of this forums membership...and youre only what 16 ?.

[Prometheus]

No.

Preserving an appearance alone is idiotic. Appearance is subjective, people tend to like those similar to them. So, if all of Europe was mixed, that would be the standard of beauty.

I'm for creating a new subrace from the best of the existing.