View Full Version : So you guys believe in "the superior white race"? Give me a break
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 03:57 AM
You guys probably don't even know that before WHITES even existed there were cro-magnons which essentially created everything good we have today. An immense sea was just beginning to be formed between Europe and Asia, which left on the eastern side a large region enclosed by sea, mountains, and ice, and isolated from the rest of the earth for thousands of years. In this region there were in isolation a few human beings and some animals. An albino type became the standard human race in this region; this type is found as an occasional freak in all races, but, under this peculiar isolation, it became a white race. And, this freak race, having been isolated together with certain varieties of animals, resulted in their taming those animals, and incidentally infected the people with those animals' diseases and parasites. Within a few generations the "white" race gradually acquired a certain amount of immunity to those diseases, which, however, they always carried with them and which proved to be their greatest weapon in their fight against other races. In fact, the number of DISEASES which are inherent in the "white" race is the only reason why whites were "supreme" for a few hundred of years.
White supremacism refuted.
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 04:04 AM
Oh, and another thing: of all the pre-historic people who came into "Europe", the only ones who showed any signs of progress at all were the Cro-Magnon men. Other races came and went, and each race acquired the arts and civilisation of the Cro-Magnon men at that particular time, and has remained at that particular stage ever since; only the Cro-Magnons kept progressing, building up slowly a civilisation which their "white" successors took over and adopted as their own, but which in the end became stagnant until progress was renewed by contact with the us red men in America. In fact, Cro-Magnons have 4 percent larger brains than white people (source: wikipedia) and they are the most closely related of all races to modern day American Indians. The White race only started progressing again after it renewed contact with the Cro-Magnon descendants, namely the American Indians, before that time you were a stagnant people. The Cro-Magnon peoples have always been the only progressive race on earth. The only people in Europe who have Cro-Magnon blood are the modern day bascques -- AND THEIR LANGUAGE IS UNRELATED TO ANY OTHER LANGUAGE IN EUROPE. In fact, in the general structure of the Basque language, it only resemembles the langauges of the us Red Indians.
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 04:09 AM
Like, how did the Romans get their civilisation? By building it upon the sophisticated civilisation of the ETRUSCIAN predecessors, as every schoolboy knows. And who were they, the etruscians? Dark-skinned people, who resemble only the Red Indians in looks and the general structure of their ancient language. The Roman Empire was progressive because it was built on the dark-skinned ETRUSCIANS, and the "white" race only began to renew its progress when it renewed its contact with other RED INDIAN-related people, in the 16th century.
So, to sum up: the white race only became progressive as a result of contact with the ETRUSCIANS (who are related to Red Indians). Then it became stagnant.
The white race once again became progressive when it renewed contact with the Red Indians in AMERICA in the 16th century.
Red Indians - more evolved descandents of the superior Cro-Magnon peoples -- are responsbile for most civilisation.
A brilliant parody of Nordicism.
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 04:14 AM
A brilliant parody of Nordicism.
I am not a parody. Do you deny:
that Roman civilisation was built on the civilisation of Etruscia? [every schoolboy knows that it was]
The etruscians were related to the Red Indians in the general structure of their language. Same with the basques. Look it up. This isn't just a theory I came up with. Many anthropoligists are amazed at the similarity between the two peoples -- between the etruscians, the basques, and the red indians (cro-magnon-descendants).
now, do you deny:
that white civilisation was STAGNANT between the time of the Roman Empire and a few hundred years ago--and was revived only roughly when it renewed contact with the red indian (cro-magnon) peoples, when the whites discovered the Americas?
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 04:16 AM
Furthermore, do you deny that cro-magnons had larger brains than modern humans (source: wikipedia)?
Do you deny that, in their heyday, the cro-magnons were the most progressive of all races?
The Red Indians, and kindred races, are descandents of the cro-magnons.
Niko Bellic
10-30-2005, 04:19 AM
I thought it was spelled "Genius".
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 04:30 AM
Another thing to consider is that the first few waves of white invasion of Europe were considerably absorbed by intermarriage, and the white people adopted the red civilization; however, because the red race didn't have the same immunity as the white races to the numerous germs the latter brought in with them, the newer waves of invasion gradually wiped the red men off the eastern hemisphere, albeit gradually enough to enable the white races to take over the civilisation, especially of the etruscians who precededed Rome.
In Western Europe, which I believe was the last stand of the red indians of the eastern hemisphere, vestiges of Cro-Magnon traits are still to be found amongst some of the inhabitants, indeed even those of the purest white complexion. Moreoevr, the folk tales referring to "giants" are probably just remnants of traditions of fight with a taller and more heavier-built race; because the name "giant" itself doesn't have a special meaning from the point of view of Aryan origin, but if Basque is a remnant of pre-Aryan speech in Europe, that word might be derived from the Basque "gizon," which means "man." However, the white races still retain in Europe many place-names, and even many survivals of the language structure and words, which are clearly traces of the red men conquered many thousands of years ago.
Niko Bellic
10-30-2005, 04:42 AM
I thought it was spelled "Genius".
Billy Score
10-30-2005, 04:46 AM
"adopted the red civilization"
I'm not even a nordicist but .. what the hell red civilziation is that? the iroquois nation? the aztecs :rofl:
I mean the incas were advanced and the aztecs were a civilization but they were at BEST on par with european empires of the time (with the incas perhaps being above them in some things).
Ixtab
10-30-2005, 04:51 AM
He seems to be talking about a red civilisation in Europe, not America, Mazdak. I have heard of such a theory before. H.G. Wells in his "Outline of History" describes the people of Etruscia as being highly reminiscent of American Indians. What Pure Genious has said about the Basque language, which supposedly resembles in its general structure only the langauges of the Native Americans, is an idea I am also familiar with. He isn't saying anything original here, although some of it is certainly questionable.
Niko Bellic
10-30-2005, 04:52 AM
So, the bottom line is that the white race kicked your ass, right?
Pure Genious
10-30-2005, 04:59 AM
Don't believe me? Below is an excerpt from "Red Civilisation: Past and Present" by A. M. Foster, pages 728-729:
During the Ice Age, the northern land-connection across the Atlantic had sunk, but the southern connection remained, not as a continuous body of land, but as a mid-Atlantic continent connected by a chain of islands with Africa on the east, and with America on the west. Traditions of this island continent of "Atlantis" have been preserved on both sides of the Atlantic. A red-race civilization certainly developed around the north central Atlantic region on both sides of the ocean, and the geographical center of this was in what is now the Sargasso sea, in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, but where tradition on both sides of the ocean places the lost continent of Atlantis.
Both Mexican and Mediterranean traditions say that a great civilisation existed on this continent, which was apparently the original center of red-race civilization, which explains why there were red-race civilisations in both the Americas and Europe/north Africa. The legend on both sides of the Atlantic states that the continent of Atlantis was occupied by ten nations unified under a common ruler and controlling an extensive empire extending far into the continents on both sides of the ocean. This great empire worked both the flint mines of France and the copper mines of Michigan. These ten nations under a single ruler were probably merely provinces of a single empire under centralized, possibly absolute, rule; but doubtless the tradition of such union had an indirect effect on the rise of the idea of federation, a plan of government developed entirely by the Red Man, and still flourishing mainly on American soil.
The pressure in that region being much greater from the east than in the west, on account of the numerous peoples of the eastern hemisphere, it is probable that Atlantis was coloniaed by red men from western Europe and Africa--that the colonisation proceeded westward through Atlantis to the Antillies Islands (the so-called West Indies) and through there back to America, the red man's own home. During the Ice Age, Atlantis furnished almost the only favorable climate for a civilization, and there the red race founded the first great civilization on earth.
Later on, this continent became submerged, thus destroying this important red-race center, and leaving its outposts in Europe and America to follow their isolated courses of development. Tradition has it that Atlantis was sunk by an earthquake, or a series of earthquakes, at about 9600 B.C.
Atlantis' colonization westward had resulted in the Atlantean empire extending into Mexico, and into the North American prairies as far north as the Great Lakes, and to the mountains, both east and west. In the meantime, when the northern land-connection between Europe and America (possibly the original home of the red race) was submerged, the peoples who lived there were forced to the American side, and had to push further down the Atlantic coast, and into the same prairie region when the great ice sheet began to advance southward. These included the Iroquois nations, as well as the Algonquin stock, of which the Penacook nations are a prominent example.
This produced a constant pressure opposing the waves of Atlantean colonization coming up from the southward, so that the peoples coming from the northeastward were driven back into the north, and to the Atlantic coast region, the Appalachian mountain range forming a barrier against the invasion of the coastal region. But, with the submergence of Atlantis itself, the main strength was gone from the spread of prairie colonization, and the "Mound Builder" civilization which occupied most of North America several thousand years ago was now beset on all sides by the Atlantic peoples. The retreat was very slow, but eventually the Algonquins spread all over North America, while the Iroquois, the Waskoki, and others established themselves in various parts of the continent. Probably the Natchez, defeated and driven into the Mississippi River in 1732, represented the last remnants of the Mound Builders, the former lords of the American prairies
Jimbo Gomez
10-30-2005, 08:40 AM
Cut the crap, you're here to troll and we all know it. Will you be adding something of substance or not? I expect a yes or no answer, not a page long copy/paste fest.
Geist
10-30-2005, 10:57 AM
I am not a parody.
Youre right, you are pastiche.
Banat
10-30-2005, 11:22 AM
Etruscians were Rascians, and hence - Serbs. Every schoolboy knows this (source - wikipedia).
Genious, are you really an Indian, or some funny guy out there? These stories are the crappiest thing I've heard for a long time.
Jonathan
10-30-2005, 02:57 PM
Pure Genious - With a name like that, this guy must be a joke.
daisy
10-30-2005, 05:37 PM
dark-skinned posted so you guys believe in the superior white race? yesalbino=white the opposite of 'albino', is 'negro'
(latin: albus=white, nigra=black)
an albino type became the standard human race in this region another thing to consider is that the first few waves of white invasion of europe were considerably absorbed by intermarriage, and the white people adopted the red civilization; however, because the red race didn't have the same immunity as the white races to the numerous germs the latter brought in with them, the newer waves of invasion gradually wiped the red men off the eastern hemisphere, albeit gradually enough to enable the white races to take over the civilisation. in western europe, which i believe was the last stand of the red indians of the eastern hemisphere, vestiges of cro-magnon traits are still to be found amongst some of the inhabitants, indeed even those of the purest white complexion. dark-skinned people, who resemble only the red indians in looks and the general structure of their ancient language.i don't know about europe. in america dark-skinnned people mixed with the blackfoot indians and the cherokee redman indians some before we assimilated the indians. albino whites assimilated the blackfoot indians right before we assimilated the cherokee redman indians.
a master albino white race.
albino whites we put something on you ajax can't take off.
Atlas
10-30-2005, 05:57 PM
Many truly well-meaning NS and other pro-white groups hold this simplistic and extremely over-optimistic view that if we somehow manage to " wake up " the majority of our people that they will intuitively get rid of the traitorous governments of much of the Western World, exterminate the parasites eating away at our people and our socities, and re-establish sanity and order.
This is not going to happen. The majority of our people are and always have been morally neutral, incapable of distingguishing absolute right from absolute wrong. They desperately want to say and think exactly what they believe is expected of them, and they take their cue from whomever is on top at the moment. When evil men rule, as has been the case in America for nearly a century, the '' people " will happily wallow in degeneracy of the worst kind.
This is also what usually makes a revolution so difficult. Not simply the power of the opposing system, but the inertia of the people - as long as they are complacent they will not resist or think outsides the lines. In the US, the standard of decadence is rather high on average; as long as the majority are able to stuff their faces with fast food and have luxury cars and watch DR. Dre and Eminem and Monday Night Football they will not even slightly waver in worshipping imaginary mental constructs like " diversity " and " multiculturalism ".
So, I'm not going to play the " Well, we are in dire straits now, but maybe if... " game. The hardship and upheaval that lies ahead of us as a people, at the end of this darkened eopch of degeneracy, will be our only chance at salvation.
What we need not to be doing in my opinion is building our infrastructure so that as the infrastructure of our enemies begins to collapse not only will our people have a recourse but will be able to secure the minority of our race who posess the majority of the foresight and strength of will to continually plan for the long term. That should be the aim of ALL groups who call themselves pro-White.
When I say '' we " I mean us all, not just Aryan Nations, National Alliance, C18 B&H or any single group, but all of us with a vested interest in the survival of our race, regardless of our sementical differences of opinions.
Gorilla
10-30-2005, 10:12 PM
You guys probably don't even know that before WHITES even existed there were cro-magnons which essentially created everything good we have today. An immense sea was just beginning to be formed between Europe and Asia, which left on the eastern side a large region enclosed by sea, mountains, and ice, and isolated from the rest of the earth for thousands of years. In this region there were in isolation a few human beings and some animals. An albino type became the standard human race in this region; this type is found as an occasional freak in all races, but, under this peculiar isolation, it became a white race.
White supremacism refuted.
I assume you're going to 'outbreed the inbreds', with your new 'dark genes', right?
;)
Billy Score
10-30-2005, 10:26 PM
I kind of have to agree with Atlas, only my concerns are not racial but simply societal. The people don't care about change because liberalism has let degeneracy replace religion as the "opiate" of the people. all of these "grassroots" movements are simply greenlights on degeneracy.
Why should the worker, the average american, or anyone in the west care about social issues or have passion when they are allowed to indulge in "free love" or drug use or sodomy on a widescale. Where every vice comes easy and cheap, and is no longer even considered a "vice", no member of the mindless masses is going to try to change this, or "wake up."
They are at the point where they believe their behavior is both justifiable and right and are horrified and disgusted when presented with the reality.
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.