PDA

View Full Version : Mandela sings about killing whites


000
09-28-2006, 09:26 PM
Mandela sings about killing whites



See the video clip here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcOXqFQw2hc

"How to be a good Communist" by Nelson Mandela.
http://www.realnews247.com/how_to_be_a_good_communist.htm

South African TV programme on brutal farm murders:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFN8WDEe6BE

WARNING: Disturbing images in above video clip.

WFHermans
09-28-2006, 10:11 PM
Now I understand why the jews love Mandela.

gooddeath
09-29-2006, 12:50 AM
Blacks singing about killing whites is nothing new.

“Niggas in the church say: kill whitey all night long. . . . the white man is the devil. . . . the CRIPS and Bloods are soldiers I’m recruiting with no dispute; drive-by shooting on this white genetic mutant. . . . let’s go and kill some rednecks. . . . Menace Clan ain’t afraid. . . . I got the .380; the homies think I’m crazy because I shot a white baby; I said; I said; I said: kill whitey all night long. . . . a nigga dumping on your white ass; fuck this rap shit, nigga, I’m gonna blast. . . . I beat a white boy to the motherfucking ground”;

“Kill Whitey”; Menace Clan, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records, subsidiaries of what was called Thorn EMI and now is called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.

“Kill the white people; we gonna make them hurt; kill the white people; but buy my record first; ha, ha, ha”

“Kill d’White People”; Apache, Apache Ain’t Shit, 1993, Tommy Boy Music, Time Warner, USA.

“A fight, a fight, a nigger and a white, if the nigger don’t win then we all jump in. . . . smoking all [of] America’s white boys”;

“A Fight”; Apache, Apache Ain’t Shit, 1993, Tommy Boy Music, Time Warner, USA.

More: http://www.amren.com/rap/rap1.htm

Aistulf
09-29-2006, 01:10 AM
Here's an ‘extended version’ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT34ymDKMhQ), which not a lot of people have seen (most saw the short one, about "ama-bhulu").

“Hey Joe Slovo, we're going to shoot them (..)”


Jew Ronald Kasrils

http://www.anc.org.za/icons/people/rkasrils.jpg


Jew Joe Slovo

http://www.sahistory.org.za/pages/people/images/slovo,j.jpg

Jake Featherston
09-29-2006, 06:58 AM
This should come as no surprise to people who know anything about Nelson Mandela. After all the propaganda about his being "a prisoner of conscience," I suspect many Phorans even still believe he was imprisoned for his beliefs, legitimate activism, or whatnot. The truth is that Nelson Mandela was imprisoned in the 1960s for bombing a passenger train, in an attempt to kill as many White civilian men, women, & children as he possibly could. He's a murdering, blood-drenched terrorist. Its a disgrace the South African government didn't execute him 40 years ago.

Ahknaton
09-29-2006, 07:17 AM
Mandela continued to direct terrorist attacks even from behind bars:

Mandela and the Church Street bombings. (http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~springbk/enemy.html)

There's something particularly satisfying about bursting the bubble of righteousness that surrounds Mandela, given the way he is worshipped as "a shining example of the human spirit" by self-hating White liberals. How I love to shit on their idols. During high school we were taught about South African history from a ridiculously slanted viewpoint, and the history teacher went out of her way to tell us that the "Umkhonto we Siswe" never targeted people, but only infrastructure such as powerlines (obviously not true).

When you think about it, David Lane is a far better example of a political prisoner than Mandela, since he never actually killed anyone or ordered anyone killed, but merely expressed his approval of a killing carried out by someone else.

enpodynic
09-29-2006, 08:19 AM
Well, whether you like Nelson Mandela or not, whether you like post-Apartheid, surely you must admit that after years of oppression, I think it's understandable that there would be a pretty severe backlash after it ended. That doesn't mean it's an okay thing, the killing of others...in this case the boer farmers. What it just means is that, I sincerely believe, the phenomanon that is taking place does have honest historical, true-to-earth roots...that these people are not savages...these are victims of horrible times and their actions are but a product of those horrible times. Everything is historical. Understanding this can be the key to endeavouring to bring this bloody chapter occuring now to an end. Further demonizing black folks only stands to create a wider rift, more oppression, more genocide, more suffering - of blacks as well as the boers.

Jake Featherston
09-29-2006, 09:06 AM
these are victims of horrible times and their actions are but a product of those horrible times.

Bullshit. The Blacks of South Africa were much, much, MUCH better off under Apartheid. The horrible times in the Union of South Africa are the ones we've seen over the last 15 years, for Whites and Blacks alike. Johannesburg is now the murder & rape capitals of the planet Earth, and the overwhelming majority of those victims are Black. A small, corrupt elite, made up mainly of Communist Party officials, ANC operatives, and high-ranking members of Xhosa tribal nobility, have taken a lot of the assets that were once in White hands, and simply given them over to themselves and their croneys. Unemployment and poverty are both much higher, as are the crimes rates, than when South Africa was sternly ruled by the hand of the White man. The White National Party's Apartheid rule ensured a certain amount of public order and economic opportunity, for Blacks and Whites (while conditions were certainly better for the Whites, conditions for the Blacks then were also much better than for the "free" Blacks living under ANC tyranny today).

That comparitively benevolent social order has been replaced by a dysporic Hellhole of savage carnage, crushing poverty, rampant HIV infection, and the general breakdown of everything that used to work in South Africa. There was a reason that White-ruled, Apartheid South Africa was such a popular destination for Black migrants, after all. The rule of the National Party was far less heavy-handed, arbitrary, and tyrannical than Black rule by the ZANU Party in "Zimbabwe"/Rhodesia, the Bolshevist Reds of Angola and Mozambique, the glorious reign of Emperor Boukassa in the Central African Republic, or amongst the various other blood-drenched, kleptocratic nightmare states that make up virtually all (if not absolutely all) of the rest of sub-Saharan Africa.

Several years ago American Renaissance (http//www.AmRen.com) reviewed a book, written by an African-American journalist, in which he travelled to South Africa in the mid-to-late 1990s, and wrote extensively about how a great many Black South Africans now regret the demise of Apartheid.

Jimbo Gomez
09-29-2006, 09:54 AM
Many negroes tried to sneak into South Africa during Apartheid, the country had a huge illefal immigration problem. Reason is that the wages and labour legislation there for negroes were the most generous of the entire continent.

Cut the liberal crap.

Starr
09-29-2006, 10:12 AM
Besides all of that, the black south Africans are killing each other in record numbers as well. I believe as far as beating/killing women goes, this is another category that the south africans are topping nearly everyone else. baby rape(to "cure" AIDS,etc.) is also becoming quite prominent. Of course, I am sure our nice liberal friend will tell us this is just an unfortunate legacy of Apartheid and the nobel black man is just angry and oppressed.:nopity: :rolleyes:

Blacks are often violent, lawless and wild where ever it is they are living enpodynic. Black savagery is a global phenomenon.

Why is it that, where whitey is concerned, liberals always take an "its pay back time" attitude? Direct that attitude at anyone else and the same people will tell you "you can't judge them all" at best, and at worse will call you an evil hater. The hypocrisy about these things never end. Why is it always ok to collectively judge whites and no one else? Why are whites always supposed to feel collectively guilty(enlightenment and healing) but never feel any collective pride?(hate):sick:

Jake Featherston
09-29-2006, 10:13 AM
David Lane is a far better example of a political prisoner than Mandela, since he never actually killed anyone or ordered anyone killed, but merely expressed his approval of a killing carried out by someone else.

That made me curious, so I looked into it; according to Wikipedia, David Lane was convicted of violating Alan Berg's civil rights, in connection with Mr. Lane's having been the get-away driver in the killing. Interestingly, no one was ever actually convicted of murdering Alan Berg (ordinarily, a get-away driver in a murder conspiracy would be considered a murderer). Perhaps one reason (though not the only one; its peculiar, frankly) that no one was convicted of murder in the Berg case is because the actual shooter was Robert J. Matthews, and the FBI had already murdered him (I'm not certain if Matthews was the actual shooter).

streetfightergirl
09-29-2006, 04:19 PM
White South Africans should suicide bomb the niggers there. Make them afraid to go on a train or in a mall............

Incitatus
09-29-2006, 04:24 PM
So this is the guy white children world wide are being taught to admire because of his great policy or racial justice in the post-Apartheid era? We shouldn't just read this and forget about it after a few days, but spread this movie as much as possible. Mandela might have done a lot for his people, but no one'll ever tell you about his racism. Sure, whites did a lot of bad things against the blacks in South Africa... but how can the multiculturalists with their ideals of "diversity" and "tolerance" honour a man who was openly ultra-racist? I don't see any of them justifying Hitler's stance towards Poles, for example, because of the things they did to the German minority in their country.

And to think that this ex-terrorist racist has even received the nobel prize of peace back in 1993... it's incredible. This shows how countering racism only means countering white racism. Anti-white racism is always "justified because of the terrible things whites have done in the past". I wonder how the multiculturalists would react if Spaniards openly declared their hatred of muslims because of what they did to them in the past, and sang songs about it in mass demonstrations. Probably by saying that "the evils of fascism and xenophobia are arising again", supported by the voice of the left-liberal establishment demonizing everything which opposes multiculturalism. O double standard!

enpodynic
09-30-2006, 06:10 AM
Mandela sings about killing whites



See the video clip here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcOXqFQw2hc
This is nonsense. It's probably not even an accurate translation.

Besides, these anti-'white' lyrics are just words - mere words. And as the saying goes, actions speak louder than words. And if the ANC was indeed a Black racist organization, then why did the PAC split from them? Why were 'WHITES' recruited as equals and even given leadership status, if the ANC just wanted to kill all "whites"?

I repeat: actions speak louder than words. And the actions of the ANC are ones of racial equality, not anti-'white' racism.

Bullshit. The Blacks of South Africa were much, much, MUCH better off under Apartheid. The horrible times in the Union of South Africa are the ones we've seen over the last 15 years, for Whites and Blacks alike. Johannesburg is now the murder & rape capitals of the planet Earth, and the overwhelming majority of those victims are Black. A small, corrupt elite, made up mainly of Communist Party officials, ANC operatives, and high-ranking members of Xhosa tribal nobility, have taken a lot of the assets that were once in White hands, and simply given them over to themselves and their croneys. Unemployment and poverty are both much higher, as are the crimes rates, than when South Africa was sternly ruled by the hand of the White man. The White National Party's Apartheid rule ensured a certain amount of public order and economic opportunity, for Blacks and Whites (while conditions were certainly better for the Whites, conditions for the Blacks then were also much better than for the "free" Blacks living under ANC tyranny today).

That comparitively benevolent social order has been replaced by a dysporic Hellhole of savage carnage, crushing poverty, rampant HIV infection, and the general breakdown of everything that used to work in South Africa. There was a reason that White-ruled, Apartheid South Africa was such a popular destination for Black migrants, after all. The rule of the National Party was far less heavy-handed, arbitrary, and tyrannical than Black rule by the ZANU Party in "Zimbabwe"/Rhodesia, the Bolshevist Reds of Angola and Mozambique, the glorious reign of Emperor Boukassa in the Central African Republic, or amongst the various other blood-drenched, kleptocratic nightmare states that make up virtually all (if not absolutely all) of the rest of sub-Saharan Africa.

Several years ago American Renaissance reviewed a book, written by an African-American journalist, in which he travelled to South Africa in the mid-to-late 1990s, and wrote extensively about how a great many Black South Africans now regret the demise of Apartheid.Complete and utter BS, and the funny thing is, you know it. You just want to score some ideological points for white supremacism.

The only "nation" Mandela has destroyed was the old, rotten apartheid regime. Well, OK he didn't destroy it. His party the ANC did.

Starr
09-30-2006, 06:13 AM
Besides, these anti-'white' lyrics are just words - mere words. And as the saying goes, actions speak louder than words.

Honest question, would you take the same attitude if a white political figure and statesmen was singing songs about killing blacks? And even more important than your opinion what would the reaction to that be? In Europe or Canada, he would be thrown in prison for inciting racial hatred and in the U.S his career would be flushed down the toilet, in the very least. The same kind of people who agree with those laws, look at Mandela as some kind of hero.what is wrong with that picture?:slap:

Farkas
09-30-2006, 04:45 PM
Besides, these anti-'white' lyrics are just words - mere words. And as the saying goes, actions speak louder than words. And if the ANC was indeed a Black racist organization, then why did the PAC split from them? Why were 'WHITES' recruited as equals and even given leadership status, if the ANC just wanted to kill all "whites"?

I repeat: actions speak louder than words. And the actions of the ANC are ones of racial equality, not anti-'white' racism.

The PAC was more radical, they stood for an all-black South Africa. The ANC claims to promote "equalism", but they don't.

There are practically no White people in the ANC, so what are you talking about? All the liberal Whites vote for the DA; they just used to support the ANC in the old days. The ANC also cheat during the elections by sending blacks from one place to the other so they can get votes in the places where there are more Whites (which is quite hard to find).

They make use of BEE and affirmative action so that the kaffirs can have nice positions everywhere, while they screw up the country.

The ANC is behind those farm murders. Farmers are being killed so that kaffirs can replace them or factories can be build on top of the land. Mbeki also want to introduce land reforms. White farmers only get six months to sell their land or they are going to get kicked out (read murdered). So what the hell are you talking about racial equality in that country?

I am not pro-Apartheid either. That was the thing that led South-Africa to it's downfall. It still allowed blacks to live in that country and in the White areas (as maid, gardener, etc...).