Gayest film ever?

[Ace Rimmer]

Dead Poets Society.

[Atlas]

" Not another teen movie ".

Pretty funny though, very unpolitically correct.

[Billy Score]

Rasberry Reich.

[Rolfing up a Storm]

Dead Poets Society.
Are you kidding me? DPS is a great film.

[Ace Rimmer]

Are you kidding me? DPS is a great film.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v690/krilnik/gay.jpg

[angrywhiteboy]

dirty dancing

ballerina swayze sucks ass

[Vindex]

Save the last (nigger lover)dance.

[brigadier Biggles]

Save the last (nigger lover)dance.

i had the misfortune of having to watch that at school once.....it was like havingoil poured in my eyes and coke in my ears...hideous...

[Member 198]

Gay Niggers From Outer Space.

[Prince Harry]

Gayest film ever would probably be 'Shaving Ryan's Privates'. Especially when they all blow each other at the end.

[brigadier Biggles]

Gayest film ever would probably be 'Shaving Ryan's Privates'. Especially when they all blow each other at the end.

rofl......

[Revolution_of_the_Mind]

To Wong Foo Thanks for Everything, Julie Newmar

http://members.cscoms.com/~suwat/poster/To_wong_Foo.jpg

[Keystone]

Any of the Star Wars films.

Maybe not wholly gay, but gay in a geekish, unbearable way.

[OVERWATCH]

Any of the Star Wars films.

Maybe not wholly gay, but gay in a geekish, unbearable way.

FALSE. Star Wars films were good.

I haven't seen any of the other films on this thread. And thank God for that.

[albion]

The Wizard Of Oz

La Cage Au Folle

My Fair Lady

Auntie Mame

[OVERWATCH]

Anyone seen the new version of 'The Producers'?

[Ahknaton]

Red Dawn ("Wolverines!" - gay)

Top Gun (homoerotic beach volleyball)

Anything with Louis Gosset Jr in it

[OVERWATCH]

Red Dawn ("Wolverines!" - gay)


Aw, man, I liked that movie. :(

'Specially the tank battle.

Still got an old ass jewspaper clipping advertising the film.

[6(sic)6]

Dirty Dancing and Beverly Hills the series are pretty gay.
Also a movie with Prince (Purple Rain I think) is so gay.

[Keystone]

FALSE. Star Wars films were good.
No. They were bad. I saw them as they were released in the movie houses, waiting for them to get better. They didn't.

I didn't bother watching the 3 "precludes", because the original 3 sucked.

I haven't seen any of the other films on this thread. And thank God for that.
all the better.

[Ahknaton]

Ghost

Anyone else notice that Patrick Swayze has been in an awful lot of really gay movies?

[Crowley]

The gayest movie I've seen recently is Platoon. Of course anything with Willem Dafoe defaults to that position.

[Keystone]

The gayest movie I've seen recently is Platoon. Of course anything with Willem Dafoe defaults to that position.
Oh yeah. Charlie Sheen didn't help that one, either. Gay.

"Full Metal Jacket" only became gay when R. Lee Ermey's DI character got killed off.

[Crowley]

Oh yeah. Charlie Sheen didn't help that one, either. Gay.



Or Tom Berenger. :o

[albion]

http://img.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/050614/182848__bird_l.jpg http://img.timeinc.net/ew/img/review/980313/video_rev.jpg
Robin Williams (Armand, left), and Nathan Lane (Albert, right)

Armand, who runs a Miami drag club, and Albert, who stars in the revue there, are appalled when they learn that son Val wants to marry Barbara, a woman whose father is a conservative U.S. senator. To please Val (and avoid scaring off his future in-laws), they come up with a novel way of passing themselves off as suitable parents.

[Niko Bellic]

Gayest film ever has to be Brokeback Mountain.

Read my review here. (http://thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=70997&postcount=15)

[Janus]

"American History X", IMO.

[Berianidze]

Starsky and Hutch (the only movie I've seen in the theatre that I've actually fallen asleep).

[Julian Curtis Lee]

Someone here should explain how they are using the term "gay." I thought it referred to homosexuality, fornication, and male-on-male sodomy. I don't recall any of the men practicing sodomy or anal sex in "Saving Private Ryan."

Is it that men expressing emotion or having more than limited, inarticulate friendships are being termed "gay"? If so, that's pathetic, displaces power to women, and discounts the souls of men.

[Kodos]

Any of the Star Wars films.

Maybe not wholly gay, but gay in a geekish, unbearable way.

Keystone I like you but STFU.

[Ahknaton]

Someone here should explain how they are using the term "gay." I thought it referred to homosexuality, fornication, and male-on-male sodomy. I don't recall any of the men getting "blow jobs" in "Saving Private Ryan." Is it that men expressing emotion or having more than limited, inarticulate friendships are being termed "gay"? If so, that's pathetic, displaces power to women, and discounts the souls of men.
In this context "gayest" just means "crappiest" or "worst".

[Dan Dare]

Notting Hill and Love, Actually tie for first place.

[Sinclair]

http://img.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/050614/182848__bird_l.jpg http://img.timeinc.net/ew/img/review/980313/video_rev.jpg
Robin Williams (Armand, left), and Nathan Lane (Albert, right)

Armand, who runs a Miami drag club, and Albert, who stars in the revue there, are appalled when they learn that son Val wants to marry Barbara, a woman whose father is a conservative U.S. senator. To please Val (and avoid scaring off his future in-laws), they come up with a novel way of passing themselves off as suitable parents.

I think it is quite a funny movie. The French original is also good.

[O'Zebedee]

The winner is: Outrageous (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076513/), "A story about a female impersonator who rooms with a pregnant schizophrenic."

Very gay, and thus repulsive to many, I know, but a surprisingly damn fine film nonetheless.

[Billy Score]

Gayest film- anything with Jared Leto. Nothing can make that guy a man.

[il ragno]

Keystone, you need to post more.

STAR WARS (I refuse to call it "A NEW HOPE", and whoever does is a fucking fool) was ok in a Flash Gordon sorta way, but watching it become a near-religion for millions of people proves more definitively than anything else that tv and shopping malls and the cargo-cult of celebrity are no substitute for an inner life. No wonder these same purported adults routinely call comic books "graphic novels"!

[Professor John Frink]

Men in Black 2.

A friend of mine drove us to the wrong cinema and I sat through it. I haven't forgiven him yet.

[Count Eustace II]

Lord of the Rings I, II & III. The interaction between Frodo and Sam was so blatantly gay, to the point of ruining an otherwise great film series.

[Julian Curtis Lee]

Get a little discernment.

The close male friendship shown in "Lord Of The Rings" was one of the most powerful and beneficial things to come across the cinema in many years; and presented something very old, natural and pure. It was also one of the most subversive elements in terms of working against the agenda of world-controllers. And depictions of natural and pure male friendship are poison to the development of homosexual culture and acceptance.

In an oversexed and perverse culture, natural male friendship breaks down, and they become strangely discredited. Natural male friendship is what once held society together, and served the protection of women and families. I was very pleased about the "Lord Of The Rings" trilogy exactly because it did show a close, emotional relationship between men without perversion; the same kind of relationship that is easily accepted between women. It had no homosexual allusions whatever (except in your mind?), and was a very good sign.

Men should not have any fear about developing close bonds, as our fathers once had, fearing they'll be vilified as "gay." This weakens male friendships and society in general. It also gives all the power to women, for whom it remains permissible to have close bonds and sisterhood. And in a very strange way, it gives a misplaced power to gays.

I find that those who squirm when seeing close male friendships are those who are over-sexualized themselves. They are squirming about their own perversion potential, because they can't observe any close human bond without getting a sex buzz off it. Or it's women who are jealous of the intimacy, and resent the idea of men having emotional relationships not under the sway of her sexual coercion.

The real gays want to establish a trend in which society comes to believe that men are only really close in perverse sexual relationships. This is a deplorable trend, and the dissing of all close male bonds as "gay" serves their agenda perfectly. I celebrate all pure male friendships, and I celebrate the beautiful friendship shown in Lord Of The Rings. When men are reasonably chaste and moral, close male friendships do not give them the heebie jeebies any more. Any more than when they took a natural shine to a 3rd Grade pal, seeing him as cool and eminently attractive as a friend. Only the oversexualized can't stand seeing close male friendship.

Men have long had close friendships with no perversion whatever, and this is the baseline of life. It needs to come back in force. Those who quickly disparge close male friendship as gay, set up an atmosphere in which only queers are 'allowed' to be close. And the women set up an atmosphere in which there will be no male cohesion or coordination in situations where that is required for their survival.

Frodo and Sam: The Power Of Male Friendship
http://celibacy.info/indexMaleFriends3.html

[Count Eustace II]

In an oversexed and perverse culture, natural male friendship breaks down, and they become strangely discredited. Natural male friendship is what once held society together, and served the protection of women and families. I was very pleased about the "Lord Of The Rings" trilogy exactly because it did show a close, emotional relationship between men without perversion; the same kind of relationship that is easily accepted between women. It had no homosexual allusions whatever (except in your mind), and was a very good sign.

Men should not have any fear about developing close bonds, as our fathers once had, fearing they'll be vilified as "gay." This weakens male friendships and society in general. It also gives all the power to women, for whom it remains permissible to have close bonds and sisterhood.

I find that those who squirm when seeing close male friendships are those who are over-sexualized themselves. They are squirming about their own perversion potential, because they can't observe any close human bond without getting a sex buzz off it.

The real gays want to establish a trend in which society comes to believe that men are only really close in perverse sexual relationships. This is a deplorable trend. I celebrate all pure male friendships, and I celebrate the beautiful friendship shown in Lord Of The Rings. When men are reasonably chaste and moral, close male friendships do not give them the heebie jeebies any more. Any more than when they took a natural shine to a 3rd Grade pal, seeing him as cool and eminently attractive as a friend. Only the oversexualized can't stand seeing close male friendship.

Calling all presentations of close male friendship "gay" is itself perverse and barren. Men used to have close friendships with no perversion whatever. That needs to come back.

I agree with you. However, the Frodo-Sam thing was overly dramatized to the point of sappiness. My close relationships with all my buddy's have never, and would never, get that sappy however much I enjoy hanging out with them. And if I saw two men interacting in real life in such a way as those two Hobbits did on film, I'd think they were definitely fudgepackers.

[Dan Dare]

The gayest aspect of the Hobbits’ depiction in the film version of LOTR was the appalling accents affected by the majority of them. Only one of the four had an authentic regional accent, although that was more North-country than than the rural Herefordshire burr that Tolkien surely imagined the Hobbits would use in the Shire.

The actor playing Merry sounded more like a native of the Bogside, while Sean Astin (Sam) inexplicably took on a cod-West Country accent reminiscent of Worzel Gummidge or Acker Bilk. Elijah Wood’s strange attempt at over-enunciated plummy BBC received pronunciation sounded very like he was trying to emulate Meryl Streep’s farcical efforts at sounding refined in The French Lieutenant’s Woman.

At least the Orcs sounded authentic.

[Julian Curtis Lee]

I agree with you. However, the Frodo-Sam thing was overly dramatized to the point of sappiness...
I'll accept the criticism of sappiness for it. That's about the worst that it was. But not "gay." Let's reserve 'gay' for gay, lest the word lose it's rightly acquired stink. (It took a long time for homosexuals to stink up the word 'gay.')

With Sam and Frodo we saw something unaccustomed in movies, but surely it was not merely sappy. I found it refreshing, subversive (to the paradigm that needs the decline in male friendship), and moving. You just have to get past sex ideas to see that.

Notice how women celebrate themselves today? And their friendships? And their mothers, and their daughters, and their 'sisterhood," and their "goddesshood" blah blah blah.

I am straight and have four children. But I also remember having fond and delicate feelings for other boys in the magical boy years. I would have been dead not to. Why should this aspect of male life be blotted out and extinct in our stories and entertainment? The world was built on real male friendship. The fact that they had Sam love a Hobbit girl and father children with her -- this should have pacified any "gay queasies" in men with their libidos strung out like Silly String twitching with every breeze. Men are capable of all the emotions, including those of sensitive regard for other men, without being perverted or less manly. And men only have social influence when they are capable of being close, networked, and loyal. Sam's expressions of loyalty to Frodo was very moving to me throughout, and 100 percent manly in an ancient, natural way. I recommend that you watch it a few more times, and soon you'll see it for what it is.

Don't let them turn "manhood" into a dimensionless cardboard cutout. We are not that moribund "macho" clown so often portrayed. The emotional discrediting of men weakens salutory male influence in society. Feminists hate seeing deep male bonds because her female intuition recognizes it as the death knell for feminist scamming, and the end of her exclusive emotional domination of men. Ever notice how females like to speak mockingly whenever they use the term "male bonding"? Natural, close male friendship represents the end of his unnatural emotional slavery to her via sex. In her ignorance, she believes this is the only way she can have him. It dismays her to see men having close bonds absent sex. It means she'll have to become useful to him in more ways that just sexual/emotional domination; she might even have to serve him again in a wide variety of female roles -- more than just giving him an erection. At present the female idea of "male service" has been reduced to giving him erections and deadly blowjobs. That's why our culture's "ideal woman" now is Paris Hilton. She has no skill or virtue whatever and gives no service. All she has is "sexiness" (lust-inducement). Female hopes now are pinned on the idea that this is the one "indispensable" that makes him need her, her 'ace-in-the-hole' for an emotional handle on him. "Frodo and Sam" upset her assumptions about what a full relationship with a man actually requires.

A return of "Frodo and Sam" (strong male friendship) would mean that women will have to become more to men again, and as loyal and devoted as Sam was to Frodo for starters. Can you imagine a movie now where a female -- say a wife -- plays the same part as Sam? Where a woman is shown as that loyal? That serviceful to a man? No, it would almost shock us. (If it were straightforwardly presented.) Yet it's natural and old as the hills. There's a new media taboo against showing women loyal and serviceful to their men -- even wives! If Sam's devoted lines had come from a woman's mouth, feminists might have gone on a rampage, burning down theaters. :D The director would probably be dragged into the World Court at the Hague. :) They would have instructed the director to remake the movie with the female acting in the correct way: "rebelling," mocking the man, "claiming her rights and independence" -- not serving, not loyal, never devoted. The Feminist Court would probably add on an extra penalty for showing a woman cooking potatoes for Frodo. :rolleyes: (I am exaggerating to make a point.)

In reality, men are meant to model loyal behaviour to women. Men in fact are the only ones who can teach women how to be wives in a spiritual sense. This is the pisser, for women, about 'Sam and Frodo' and real male friendships. Women will never be more loyal to men than men are to each other, and men in friendship set the bar for her.

And I can't abide seeing "gays" become the only men who are "close" in the public mind. That is a trend that needs to be pre-empted pronto. Don't you know that natural, pure, and close friendships among men create distress and dismay for gays, because it casts their relationships back into their true light? Women are inspired and attracted by men in close friendship. Now perverts are taking on that mantle. Now some straight women gather 'round them for dissonant inspiration, like blind women trying to get water from a stump. Men need to take back their tradition of close friendship at all costs.

The sex-free depiction of Sam and Frodo's friendship was no less than a bomb planted at the foundation of the homosexual agenda, and I applaud it. When we see pure and close male friendships celebrated -- as much as they celebrate female and 'gay' relationships -- we will know that we can win any battle, and a needed clarification will occur in our culture.

Frodo and Sam: The Power Of Male Friendship
http://celibacy.info/indexMaleFriends3.html

[Keystone]

The LOTR film absolutely murdered the Ents. They were represented as literal walking trees in the movie, which wasn't the case in the novels.

Also, Bombadil was left out. That could have been a great character if the right actor were chosen.

[Ravenheart]

Also, Bombadil was left out. That could have been a great character if the right actor were chosen.

I never liked Bombadil in the books. He seemed so oddly out of place to me.

[Eisenhans]

Brokefuck Mountain

"May I push your stool in?"