PDA

View Full Version : Why don't Aussie girls date Asian men?


000
10-25-2006, 07:15 AM
some comment

I'm an asian guy and I think white girls can be much prettier and better built than asian girls. I have done okay with aussie girls. Had some pretty girlfriends but got turned down a fair share too. I traveled throughout europe for almost two years. European girls are unbeatable. Anyway, it's obvious that many factors contribute to why aussie girls are reluctant to date asian guys. I must admit that asian guys are at a bit of a disadvantage because we tend to be shorter and less muscular. But I think the main factors are historical, cultural, and social. I'm only average height and build but white girls like me because I'm outgoing with them. I think I've become good at flirtation and can make girls feel pretty and desired. I know I'm different than many of my asian mates who are shy around white girls. The legacy of colonialism is not so easy to shake. For a long time people accepted that white men could help themselves to women of color anytime while men of color had to keep their hands off white women. Change is slow but it's happening.
Posted by: vietBloke at October 24, 2006 11:14 PM
vietBloke - "european girls are unbeatable"

hey vietBloke, i'm an east asian guy myself, and i'd love to know more about how euro girls treated you, when you spent about two years there. do most euro girls like east asian guys? do east asian guys have a lot luck with euro girls, in the dating dept.? etc.
thanks, for your reply.

Posted by: Pho 88 at October 25, 2006 04:06 PM
I have an Australian boyfriend of chinese decent and I myself am a "white Aussie" female.

I think the majority of the post on this blog are generalised and racist.

'Aussie' girls do date 'Asian' men.

Posted by: rockin at October 24, 2006 03:12 PM
Wow. As an american, and an asian man reading this, I have to wonder just how backwards a society australia is. Here in the states, we have blacks and latinos who are united with asians, fighting for a common front against oppression from, yes, el Cracker himself, the white guy, (The head of civil rights NAACP, a predominantly black organization here is chinese), so I can only imagine just how backwards it is in Australia. I'd like to put some stats up.

In the USA, asian male outmarriage rates, especially amongs 2nd and 3rd generation kids is: 31%. Hell, half of my class of asian guys in high school married white, black, and latin women. Asian female outmarriage is on the order of 43%. Now we're not counting cohabitation yet. A difference of 12% ain't much, at all.

But I'd like to show something else, about just how REALLY backwards australian and anglo derived societies are in general when it comes to race relations. Latin America is about a half billion people. There's a ton of asians down there, and the asian male outmarriage rate is in the order of 80%- 85% Even Peru, can count about 20% of it's population as having chinese blood, and that's from a chinese or japanese Dad. From the borders of Mexico all the way to Tierra Del Fuego, in general, for the most part, most people don't give a $%^& about your race or color. Especially if you're asian.

So what is it? What's the real problem? It can't be size if they get non asian wives so quick. It can't be that passive B.S., because asian latinos are like any other latino. They know how to hit it.

Is it because Australia society, which was white only immigration only 25 years ago, has a LOOOONNNNGGGG way to go? Is it because anglo derived societies, which have this incessant need to divide, stereotype, and categorize? Cause let me tell you, the moment you leave the airport, the moment youleave the border, that B.S. stereotype crap stops there. Heck, even Quebec is more open to it. Vietnamese men outmarry like no body's business there. And nobody gives a crap. Want to know why? Because a man is a man, and a woman is a woman, and these societies acknowledge it.

I have a theory on this, and the theory is this. Latin america, and the carribean, has always been a small white minority. They always had to marry someone else, of a different color. Cut 500 years later, it's normal, and no one gives a damn.

But anglo derived societies? Well, they've got at least 500 years to go to catch up with learning how to accept other humans. Australia has 475 more to go.

And the last part? In latin society, men are expected to be men. They are the ones who hit on women, not vice versa, so to the whining asian guys, you better look at yourself in the mirror and pledge to hit on at least 10 women a week. If not, you have no place whining.

Peace.


Posted by: Dave at October 22, 2006 02:18 PM


http://blogs.smh.com.au/lifestyle/allmenareliars/archives/2006/10/whats_wrong_wit.html#comments

Asian man like black man, want to race mixing with white women.

Ahknaton
10-25-2006, 07:48 AM
I think "vietBloke" does have a point when he says that historically it has been culturally more acceptable for White men to date non-White women than vice versa. I know a couple of White guys in my social in WM/AF relationships, but I also know an AM/WF couple (she's a pretty good looking woman too).
Here in the states, we have blacks and latinos who are united with asians, fighting for a common front against oppression from, yes, el Cracker himself, the white guy, (The head of civil rights NAACP, a predominantly black organization here is chinese), so I can only imagine just how backwards it is in Australia.
Surprisingly honest comment (although I would guess that this was posted on a message board devoid of "el Cracker"). It frustrates me how willing Asians are to team up with Blacks against White people, especially when in non-political spheres they have more in common with Whites (higher-IQ, low crime etc). Personally I think that Asians exaggerate the amount of "oppression" and prejudice they get from White people. Most Asians seem to do exceedingly well in White-dominated societies, so it's not like oppression from Whites is materially affecting them in any way. The same is true of other minorities like Indians. In and of themselves they are no problem, but politically they team up against Whites and create the circumstances (e.g. open immigration) where other groups that are a problem (e.g. Muslims) can enter and negatively impact their host societies. Of course Jews are example numero uno of this phenomenon. They also exacerbate existing social problems by stirring shit between existent groups to further their interests.

It just annoys the hell out of me that we welcome these people into our countries, bend over backwards to accomodate them, whittle away our own freedoms with "hate speech" and "anti-vilification laws, and it's still no enough for them. I mean, looking around our hyper-liberal society, if this isn't enough, what the hell is it going to take? White people publically parading around the town square each morning and flaggelating themselves over their White guilt? Non-White dating quotas for White people to meet? Mandatory interracial relationships? They'll never be appeased until we completely wipe out our identity and abolish all trace of our cultural differences (which is in the process of happening).

I'll pass over without comment the stereotypical liberal BS about "social progress" being measured by lack of racial identity in these comments.