PDA

View Full Version : America in 2050 : another country.


Atlas
11-18-2005, 04:22 AM
America in 2050: Another country


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com


In 1960, when JFK defeated Nixon, America was a nation of 160 million, 90 percent white and 10 percent black, with a few million Hispanics and Asians sprinkled among us.

We were one nation, one people. We worshipped the same God, spoke the same English language, studied American history and English literature, honored the same heroes, read the same books, watched the same TV shows, went to the same movies, and saw ourselves as defenders of Western Civilization against the godless communism of the Soviet Empire.

We were confident and proud of who we were. When Nikita Khrushchev demanded an apology for our having sent a U-2 spy plane over Russia, Ike blew up the Paris summit rather than accede to his demand. We cheered the old general's defiance.

That was yesterday. But due to the Immigration Act of 1965 and the cultural revolution of the '60s, that America is now gone forever. And as one studies the latest projections of the Census Bureau, the America of our grandchildren will be another country altogether, a nation unrecognizable to our parents, a giant Brazil of the North.

In 2050, there will be three times as many people living here as in 1960 – 420 million. White Americans will be a minority, 49 percent, and falling. Hispanics in the United States, over 100 million, will be equal to the entire population of Mexico today. Our Asian population will be almost as large as our African-American population today.

By countries of origin, America will be a Third World nation. Our cities will look like Los Angeles today. Los Angeles and the cities of Texas, Arizona and California will look like Mexico City.

When we all belong to "minorities," what will hold us together? With the rise of group rights and identity politics, we are already falling out and falling apart over racial preferences and ethnic entitlements.

In the 1990s, for the first time since the Spanish arrived, the white population of California fell. White flight has begun. The white majority, voting with its feet, is ceding the Golden State to Hispanic and Asian immigrants.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, author of "Who We Are," raises an alarm about the huge infusion of Hispanics into the Southwest, and for many reasons.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans. They are concentrating in states bordering Mexico, which is their country and a nation with a historic grievance against us. They are holding on to their language and culture, creating a Hispanic nation within our nation. By 2050, there will be scores of millions of people living here whose loyalty is to a foreign country.

Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.

As immigrant children grow up, who will teach them to love and cherish America? Will they not come to exhibit that same sullen hostility to our country we see erupting at soccer games with Mexico today? There, Mexican fans, whether in the Los Angeles Coliseum or in Guadalajara, curse our players, shout down our national anthem and chant "Osama! Osama!" when the Mexican team scores.

Is the Census Bureau future the future Americans wish? Are they willing to risk it for their grandchildren? No and no are the answers.

Why, then, does that future appear inevitable?

Answer: Though a majority of Americans wish to preserve the land they grew up in for their children, our elites – political, academic, cultural and corporate – are either unwilling to conserve that America, or are indifferent to its disappearance, or long for its death.

A majority of Americans want immigration cut back and all illegal aliens sent back. Why is the will of the majority, expressed in polls and referenda, not reflected in law or policy? Because we no longer live in a democratic republic. We are ruled by a managerial elite.

America's corporate elites want an endless supply of cheap labor. Our judges throw out popularly enacted laws to which they object. Our academic elites work to see "white, racist America" disappear. Our neo-Marxist cultural elites wish to be the gravediggers of the West and of Christian culture. And America's conservative party, the Republican Party, believes Hispanics hold the key to retention of presidential power, and is desperately anxious not to offend Vicente Fox.

If, by 2050, the America we grew up in has become a Tower of Babel of squabbling minorities that is falling apart, it will be because of the treason of the elites, and our lack of will to overthrow them.


Source : http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37720

Kodos
11-18-2005, 05:07 AM
Good article...

The Retard
11-18-2005, 05:28 AM
Luckily, I'll be dead by then, and this article is almost 2 years old.

Atlas
11-18-2005, 05:37 AM
and this article is almost 2 years old.

So what ? it isn't outdated.

Starr
11-18-2005, 05:59 AM
Almost anything by PJB is worth a read no matter how long ago it was written. He has good points as always,



but I don't like the shit about "holding us all together" and I also don't see the positive in assimilation. He bitches about non-white immigration endlessly, but then seems to think everything would be great if they would be taught to "love America" and "assimilate" Maybe then everything would be peace, love, and harmony. You are smarter than that, Pat.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans.

Aule
11-18-2005, 07:43 AM
Luckily, I'll be dead by then, and this article is almost 2 years old.

Don't you care about the kind of world you're descendents will have to live in?

Jimbo Gomez
11-18-2005, 12:38 PM
Well starr, in the hypothesis where oyu believed kicking them out is no longer possible and they'll stay for good, wouldn't you prefer to see them assimilated over them being uncivilized?

Crowley
11-18-2005, 04:59 PM
Well starr, in the hypothesis where oyu believed kicking them out is no longer possible and they'll stay for good, wouldn't you prefer to see them assimilated over them being uncivilized?

Biological assimilation is the disappearance of a people. Bad thing.

Barbarossa
11-18-2005, 08:24 PM
Biological assimilation is the disappearance of a people. Bad thing.

sterilization is always an option.

Jimbo Gomez
11-18-2005, 10:03 PM
Biological assimilation is the disappearance of a people. Bad thing.


I know that bardamu. That does not answer my question.

Fade the Butcher
11-18-2005, 10:38 PM
I lost all respect for Buchanan when he endorsed Dubya before the 2004 election.

Jimbo Gomez
11-18-2005, 10:48 PM
I lost all respect for Buchanan when he endorsed Dubya before the 2004 election.

That was an alltime low yes, even I noticed it from across the ocean. Still, his older work is good, solid stuff.

Crowley
11-18-2005, 10:49 PM
I lost all respect for Buchanan when he endorsed Dubya before the 2004 election.

Maybe Buchanan had his eye on the Supreme Court prize. Hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knew the depths of Jorge's corruption, including Jorge, and he still doesn't, one of the advantages to being callow and stupid.

The Retard
11-18-2005, 11:50 PM
Don't you care about the kind of world you're descendents will have to live in?

No, I'm not having kids.

Pat Buchanan is an old fart, and children of today don't hold his values. White guys don't think twice before dating a latina or an asian girl. What do you want me to say? We just don't hold the values of people from 100 years ago.

Sinclair
11-19-2005, 12:05 AM
The "2050 and race" articles miss something: There is no promise that things will continue as they do now.

For example, within the next 10 years, it is extremely likely that world oil will "peak", basically removing the basis of the world economy, that is, cheap gasoline. Ditto other fossil fuels. The ways this will affect the world are meaningless.

Now, the US will probably be majority non-white in 2050. But that will probably be relatively small beans compared to the coming global depression, from which there will most likely be no escape as there was from the Depression of the 30s. As gasoline becomes more expensive and harder to get the world economy will revert to as it was before the automobile, before boats run on cheap gasoline, before airplanes, etc. And remember that coal will probably also be rarer, and harder to mine, since digging equipment uses internal-combustion engines.

And of course add to this environmental degredation including global warming.

On the other hand, the argument could be made that these (Problems relating to race, ethnicity, and culture; unsustainability of the world economy; environmental harm) are all related somehow... Remember that the latter two are basically related to the way money is made, and so is the first (Why were slaves brought from Africa to the US? Cheaper than employing free workers to do that sort of work. Why is so little being done about problems with immigration today? Because business wants cheap workers who can be used and then thrown away, to trouble somebody else, not the businessmen in their gated enclaves).

Felix the Cat
11-19-2005, 12:29 AM
Regarding the "peak oil" thing, folks are forgetting that free markets are a product of plenty, security and stability

If the price of a particular commodity becomes too expensive, "free trade" in it will end, and the strongest powers will seize control of its sources

The world will then see a return to the exclusive economic zones that prevailed before WWII and Bretton Woods

Starr
11-19-2005, 02:39 AM
Well starr, in the hypothesis where oyu believed kicking them out is no longer possible and they'll stay for good, wouldn't you prefer to see them assimilated over them being uncivilized?


They are going to be uncivilized anyway. Attempting to adapt to the type of dying culture that PB refers to is not going to change them a real lot.(I was thinking that was something he would know) Besides the more uncivilized they continue to act the more people are not going to want them around. They(like we) are better off living among their own, anyway.

Biological assimilation is the disappearance of a people. Bad thing.

Correct.

I lost all respect for Buchanan when he endorsed Dubya before the 2004 election.

He went with what he saw as the lesser of two evils I am sure. He doesn't seem to like or support him much now.

OVERWATCH
11-19-2005, 03:00 AM
I lost all respect for Buchanan when he endorsed Dubya before the 2004 election.

I didn't like it either, but all in all I'd say that the alternative (Kerry/Edwards) was worse. It's his pragmatic side showing.

And if nothing else, the Texa$ moron,his poisonous gnome of a sidekick, and his comical entourage are far more entertaining than the drab demicans that were offered forth in 2005.