View Full Version : 50 babies a year are alive after abortion
Ambrosio Spinola
11-28-2005, 09:09 AM
Damn!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=369922&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=&ct=5
The debate over abortion was reignited last night after it emerged that 50 babies survive botched terminations in Britain every year.
The figures are the first to show the true scale of a problem thought to have been confined to just a handful of babies.
Now some of the country's leading doctors will investigate how so many survived to be born after just 22 weeks of pregnancy. Shockingly, some of the babies may have gone through more than one abortion.
The revelation triggered demands for the time limit for terminations to be cut. The procedure is currently offered 'on demand' up until the 24th week of pregnancy.
The latest figures emerged from the Confidential Enquiry into Child Health (Cemach), which monitors pregnancy deaths on behalf of Britain's six royal colleges of medicine. The study showed that, each year, up to 50 babies survive abortions carried out after 22 weeks.
Doctors in Norwich are treating a toddler born at 24 weeks after three botched terminations.
The boy, now aged two, has a range of medical problems. Cemach's report to the Department of Health could see Britain's abortion procedures being overhauled.
Currently, abortions at 22 weeks of pregnancy and above involve the fatal injection of a chemical into the baby's heart while it is still in the womb.
Any babies that survive the procedure, and are born alive, are entitled to medical care. However, anti-abortion campaigners claim that some are so unwanted that they are simply left to die.
Last night, one of Britain's leading obstetricians accused the doctors who carried out botched abortions of 'sub-standard' medicine.
Jimbo Gomez
11-28-2005, 10:20 AM
This is horrible. It only serves to strengthen my opinion about infanticide though.
Péter
12-02-2005, 02:21 AM
Hmm...so if one can't kill them, one must save them?
What a logical society we have!
Starr
12-02-2005, 03:56 AM
The study showed that, each year, up to 50 babies survive abortions carried out after 22 weeks.
What does up to 50 mean? 49, 48, 1 or 2? Even 50 does not seem like a big number compared to how many are succesfully performed. Is anyone even going to give a second thought to this besides the anti-abortionists?
Heavens to Betsy
12-02-2005, 09:09 PM
All this article make's me think is that those doctors really suck at their jobs.
Starr
12-03-2005, 03:02 AM
I am against abortion for the most part, but I think I would rather be aborted then to come into the world unwanted.
Starr
12-03-2005, 04:07 AM
But you are still entering the world with many strikes against you. And as for "the state" I wouldn't really want to be taken of by people who couldn't care less.
I am against abortion for the most part, but I think I would rather be aborted then to come into the world unwanted.
I wish I was unwanted, and it would be especially cool to be one of these abortion-surviving babies. I'd develop some sort of complex and spend my life trying to prove my worth to everyone. As it is, I'm too content with myself, and consequently very lazy.
So, parents, get abortions and tell any children who survive that you didn't want them and tried to kill them; we'll have a society of over-achievers!
riddlemethis
12-07-2005, 03:27 PM
i always disliked the foster houses in the past because some of them used to brainwash children by getting them to wear earphones to bed to listen to tapes that had subliminal messages in them.
Do you have documentation for this?
Helios Panoptes
12-08-2005, 04:46 PM
i always disliked the foster houses in the past because some of them used to brainwash children by getting them to wear earphones to bed to listen to tapes that had subliminal messages in them.
Why do you make things up?
daisy
12-08-2005, 05:31 PM
i didn't make that up and i do not believe the children made it up either. i am on the children's side. it was back in the 1980's so it doesn't matter much now.
don't play naive with me you can search google just as good as i can
abuse in foster care homes
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=abuse+in+foster+homes&btnG=Google+Search
mind control in foster homes
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mind+control+in+foster+homes&btnG=Google+Search
irs abuse
http://www.neo-tech.com/irs-class-action/
that's right i forgot where i was at. the internet belongs to the state and their organized spy ring. the state doesn't help white people. they are only there for the muds. the state is the one stealing our albino children and granddchildren to use them in albino breeding programs. well mr/mrs state you are helping turn all your true love muds into muded albinos. when your job is done we will see who will help you then.
Helios Panoptes
12-10-2005, 01:19 AM
don't play naive with me you can search google just as good as i can
Indeed, but the burden of proof is yours. If you make claims, you need to provide documentation, not expect others to hunt it down.
abuse in foster care homes
First, this is a link to an open search. You consider that verification? You are sorely mistaken. Second, the search is for "abuse in foster care homes," which is not the topic of discussion; it is mind control in foster homes.
mind control in foster homes
You're a lazy, incompetent poster who's unable to back up her bullshit. This is all that's been proven. Additionally, I looked at this search, did you? There aren't even links to the deranged theories of fellow addle-headed crackpots. None of the links are in anyway related to your nonsense. Try harder or begone.
daisy
12-10-2005, 01:26 PM
you're a lazy, incompetent poster who's unable to back up her bullshit. this is all that's been proven. additionally, i looked at this search, did you?no i didn't look at the search. i have already heard about the mind control headphones straight from children. since i believe the children i didn't look it up. i have also already heard on the tv news how many foster children were being sexualy abused and locked in basements. one foster care home locked two children in a shed and left them there to starve. they were lucky they were rescued by a neighbor. it shed some secrecy so the public could see gaps in the system. this is what finally forced the social services to make some changes to the state system.
in america i can see with my own eyes the gov is stealing albinos. the government is in the baby stealing business now. i am not the only one who can see this. i have seen other people posting this on websites too.
http://www.greatdreams.com/freeidaho.htm
there are some whites with gray hair that are not albinos and they don't have to worry about their babies getting stoled. they are stealing albino babies.
Starr
12-10-2005, 06:43 PM
i have also already heard on the tv news how many foster children were being sexualy abused and locked in basements. one foster care home locked two children in a shed and left them there to starve.
You hear about things like this all too often. Which goes back to my original point about it being better if some of these kids were aborted instead of living this type of life as a child and then passing on into their adult life with all kinds of issues. There are plenty of kids that are unwanted by their biological parents that find a home with good people, but there are plenty of others that do not and are either abused or just pass from foster home to foster home never finding a real home where they get what they need to be a psychologically healthy member of society. Sad, but all too true.
I don't know what was going on in the post above mine. I feel like I am in need of some strong meds after reading it.:confused:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.