PDA

View Full Version : Encyclopediadramatica on WNs


eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 08:17 PM
Because of constant playa-hatin by the jew media, White nationalism has become the politically-correct term for the new White supremacy. This movement is an attempt by whites to reclaim originally caucasian lands, such as North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Australia, and the Internets exclusively for the white race. It is the newest hangout for trolls and 16 year old girls.

Contents
1 Common White Nationalist Lingo
2 Who is White?
3 White Nationalist Facts
4 White Nationalist Struggle Against Anti-WNs
5 Summary of White Nationalist Holocaust Denial
6 Criticism of White Nationalism
7 See Also

Common White Nationalist Lingo

14 - Signifies the 14 points which state: 1. Whites rock, 2. Blacks suck, 3. So do other races, 4. But especially blacks.
88 - Can be used in place of 1988 or it can signify the eighth letter of the alphabet, twice. Heil Hitler!
Hispanic - A person of pure white-Spanish descent.
Holohoax - Holocaust + Hoax.
Mestizo - A person who contains any amount of any Central or South American Indian blood.
Mud - A mixture of water and dirt or a person who is stained with non-white semen.
Mongrel - A person who is not white.
Nigger - A person who is a negro.
Negress - The feminine form of nigger, recently deemed hilarious by the Pope.
Zionism - Relating to decisions, political power, and lobbying performed by Rob Schneider or Adam Sandler.


Who is White?
In the White Nationalist movement, whiteness is a situational judgement call. It consists of three levels.


If someone is of pure European anscestry as far back as it is possible to trace, white in appearance, and at least a little less Jewish than Hitler, then the person is indefinitely white.
If someone is of mixed ancestry with a non-white race and white in appearance, then there are several factors that must be taken into account. It is generally accepted that anyone who is 15/16 white (see #1) or higher is good enough. However, lower fractions can be accepted depending largely on how white in appearance and how racist against chocolate fun-time the person is.
If someone is of jewish ancestry, one must first disregard the fact that Jews are whites and apply #2. If the test passes, then the person must reject all of his Jewish ancestry and must display a hatred toward every Adam Sandler and Rob Schneider movie.


Exceptions

Jews are white when they are examples of white creativeness.
Jews are white when they are examples of high white intelligence.


White Nationalist Facts

Hitler was a God and Mein Kampf is a Bible.
Whites are in danger of disappearing, much like Israel, the United States, and the English language. They must be preserved at all costs.
Whites have little common ancestry with blacks. Whites are descendants of cro-magnons while blacks are descendants of Neanderthal, which was proven by Klingons at least 100 years ago.
Blacks and other mud-colored races are genetically less intelligent and more prone to crime than whites.
Using the same studies which suggest the above, White Nationalists have to admit that East Asians are much smarter and less prone to crime than whites. This problem is solved by creatively rewriting the entire history of humanity so that Asians are now simply a mutant breed of whites, probably descended from some Vikings who went a little too far east during a pillaging. Seriously, they could have just taken a wrong turn at Paris or something.


White Nationalist Struggle Against Anti-WNs

White Nationalists are not white supremacists, they are just fighting to preserve their race, which is not superior to others, which is why it must be preserved, which is why all other races must leave, which is why other races are mongrels.
Every race should go back to their land of origin and live happily. Stupid, ignorant antis will always fail to make the obvious distinction between "land of origin where people of your own race established a country and government by fighting and killing the native inhabitants in a hostile takeover" and "land of origin where your ancestors are from." It's like, duh...roflcopter!
Acknowledge that not all mongrels are bad, which is why they should go back to their race's land of origin (see above) and help out there.
It is extremely important to use the defense that you are not responsible for any of the atrocities of your race, such as slavery and genocide, but, at the same time, you are responsible for all the accomplishments of your race, especially classical music, which you've never even listened to.
When an anti probes you to prove the holocaust never happened, return fire with a fatal blow, "ORLY??? y dont u proof thta it DID happen gaywad faggot!" The antis will never see it coming.
Any news of a non-white committing a crime against a white person is living proof that non-whites contain no brains or lulz.


Summary of White Nationalist Holocaust Denial

Holocaust witnesses are liars.
Cremating 6 million jews would have cost Nazi Germany too much valuable energy. Around 3 million would be more reasonable, which is a perfectly reasonable number of civilian casualties, really.
The Nazis were only rich enough to engineer a small number of tiny, non-poisonous gas chambers. The large, poison-gas variety would take all of the internets to build.
The Allies planted fake evidence in order to demonize Germany. Zee Germans ver just doingk der jobs, they were actually a pretty friendly bunch.
The jew media makes researching the holocaust's claims illegal.
Present-day Nazi supporters harbor neither negative nor violent feelings toward other races, much like the Nazis of old.


Criticism of White Nationalism
Critics of white nationalism are either jealous mongrels or self-hating white multiculturalist race-traitors.

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/White_nationalism

///M power
01-13-2007, 08:27 PM
is Aryan imperium part of this group?:rofl:
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Image:Wnparty.jpg

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 08:29 PM
Critics of white nationalism are either jealous mongrels or self-hating white multiculturalist race-traitors.

You forgot to add jews such as yourself, egg.

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 08:36 PM
You forgot to add jews such as yourself, egg.

ah, but I didn't write this. Someone else did. That's why there's a link there.

Once again, the internut claims another victim.

http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g212/nickterry/tostupidleaveinternet5mqm6.gif

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 08:38 PM
Ah, but no one said you wrote it, jew. I simply pointed out that they left filth like you out of that section of the article. Understand? Of course you do.

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 08:40 PM
By the way Egg, isn't it bedtime in Israelie about now? What are you doing up so late?

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 08:50 PM
Ah, but no one said you wrote it, jew. I simply pointed out that they left filth like you out of that section of the article. Understand? Of course you do

No, I'm already covered in the 'critics' section, apparently.

By the way Egg, isn't it bedtime in Israelie about now? What are you doing up so late?

Because I don't live in Israel, genius.

///M power
01-13-2007, 08:52 PM
By the way Egg, isn't it bedtime in Israelie about now? What are you doing up so late?

no, its only 22:52

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 08:54 PM
no, its only 22:52

Only two hours behind me. Yes, DWW, that's not a false flag I'm flying, I really do live in Britain.

What I'd do for a remote-controlled cattle-prod sometimes....

ivory bill
01-13-2007, 08:57 PM
Only two hours behind me. Yes, DWW, that's not a false flag I'm flying, I really do live in Britain.

What I'd do for a remote-controlled cattle-prod sometimes....

Not being ready to make aliyah yet, Israel is more a state of mind for Milhouse.

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 09:01 PM
Only two hours behind me. Yes, DWW, that's not a false flag I'm flying, I really do live in Britain.

What I'd do for a remote-controlled cattle-prod sometimes....

You and me both homer, only I'd like something a little more messier than a simple cattle prod.

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 09:02 PM
Not being ready to make aliyah yet, Israel is more a state of mind for Milhouse.


You deserve a green one today, my friend!

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 09:04 PM
You and me both homer, only I'd like something a little more messier than a simple cattle prod.

I was always quite partial to the chainsaws in the 'Evil Dead' movie. :D

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 09:06 PM
I like silenced hi-cap .45's myself.

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 09:07 PM
Not being ready to make aliyah yet, Israel is more a state of mind for Milhouse.

^
the responses so far prove everything that everybody ever says about WNs.

1) they're not very bright
2) anybody who takes the piss out of them must be a j00
3) anybody who argues with them and dares contradict their heroes (MuadDid, Glenn Miller, Dolfy, Zuendel) is definitely a j00

I've almost come to the point where I'm HAPPY there are little ponds for WNs to splash around in on the internut. The internut is not real life. This grand political strategy of 'taking to the internet' looks like it's gonna be a rip-roaring success, guys. You may wish to reconsider.

:nopity:

Saas
01-13-2007, 09:16 PM
I've almost come to the point where I'm HAPPY there are little ponds for WNs to splash around in on the internut. The internut is not real life. This grand political strategy of 'taking to the internet' looks like it's gonna be a rip-roaring success, guys. You may wish to reconsider.The Internet actually is part of real life; nothing magical about it, just a network of networks used by real people. Sure, there's plenty of bullshitting and outright lying on the Internet, but the same is true in any medium, or even face to face.

Like television, the Internet can indeed be politically useful, provided that there is solid leadership for the movement in question (especially good resource management, including of human resources: knowing how to keep the troops focused on goals rather than squabbling with each other like retards on crack). Money will amplify its usefulness. Of course, money and good leadership are the two things most lacking in the WN scene.

Disclaimer: I'm not a WN myself.

Sulla the Dictator
01-13-2007, 09:18 PM
The Internet actually is part of real life; nothing magical about it, just a network of networks used by real people. Sure, there's plenty of bullshitting and outright lying on the Internet, but the same is true in any medium, or even face to face.


True, but the Internet has a lot more of the negatives. There's a lot of stuff you can't get away with lying about in real life that you can online.

BTW, excellent post Egghead. :D

Saas
01-13-2007, 09:20 PM
True, but the Internet has a lot more of the negatives. There's a lot of stuff you can't get away with lying about in real life that you can online.There's also often a lot of truth communicated online that can't so easily be spoken at work, at the dinner table, etc. It works both ways.

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 09:22 PM
The word would be "jew" Egg, and there is a subtle difference between being "bright" and a clever liar, the latter of which your star outshines all others.

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 09:25 PM
True, but the Internet has a lot more of the negatives. There's a lot of stuff you can't get away with lying about in real life that you can online.

BTW, excellent post Egghead. :D

This is true and there has never been a more glaring example such as yourself. Indeed, there are a lot of things you can say online that you would never dream of saying in person to someone's face. Isn't that right, Dickktater?

| I, CWAS
01-13-2007, 09:25 PM
I think the argument that the internet is not representative of real life has perhaps aged and is no longer applicable. 10 years ago, when fewer people had an internet connection, that could be said. Now with 1.1 billion people using the internet times have changed.

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 09:35 PM
I think the argument that the internet is not representative of real life has perhaps aged and is no longer applicable. 10 years ago, when fewer people had an internet connection, that could be said. Now with 1.1 billion people using the internet times have changed.

The question is not whether the internet is representative of real life, but whether in fact the internet distracts from the real world. If you have 10,000 people all posting on Stormfront 24-7, you actually don't have 10,000 people organising themselves politically. Internet activism is too often taken as a substitute for real activism.

The other thing is the internet is awash with crap. The fact that some ideologies are 'big on the internet', such as white nationalism or Holocaust denial, means they have become tarred with the same brush as porn, myspace teen antics and 9/11 conspiracy theories. They circulate almost exclusively within the internet, and not outside it.

Dances with Wolves
01-13-2007, 09:44 PM
Here we have Egg taking the interesting postion that certain ideologies are "crap" and on the same level as myspace teen antics yet he spends 24/7 on the abstract internet trying to refute them.

I don't know if you have a myspace account Egg, but I doubt you spend much time there. On the other hand, maybe you do. I understand there are a lot of pervs with accounts on that popular site.

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 09:46 PM
Here we have Egg taking the interesting postion that certain ideologies are "crap" and on the same level as myspace teen antics yet he spends 24/7 on the abstract internet trying to refute them.

But such entertainment I have watching you chimps trip over yourselves.

I don't know if you have a myspace account Egg, but I doubt you spend much time there. On the other hand, maybe you do. I understand there are a lot of pervs with accounts on that popular site.

No myspace account, sorry DWW.

Saas
01-13-2007, 10:30 PM
The question is not whether the internet is representative of real life, but whether in fact the internet distracts from the real world.
As I've pointed out before, it's part of the real world and as with many toolsets, its degree of usefulness depends on the user. If you have 10,000 people all posting on Stormfront 24-7, you actually don't have 10,000 people organising themselves politically. Internet activism is too often taken as a substitute for real activism.You're missing the point that Internet activism can be real activism. Fundraising is an example that ought to be obvious. i.e. Free Republic raises a respectable amount of money, much of which likely ends up flowing into GOP coffers. There's also no requirement that Internet activism has to be done "24/7," or otherwise to the exclusion of other forms of activism. If utilized by a real organization, the Internet is going to be supplemental rather than exclusive. Real organizations don't exist only in cyberspace; when you see a supposed political party that exists only as a website, that's not a problem inherent to the 'net; that's a problem with the "party." Likewise, before the WWW there were "parties" and "movements" that existed only in college papers, idle daydreams, and so forth. You're blaming human failings on a technology that can be useful, but like other tools isn't always used effectively.

So if you have 10,000 people merely chit-chatting about trivia on a website, sure, they're not organizing themselves politically. But if you have an actual organization with effective leadership you can train those 10,000 people to use the Internet in accomplishing real political objectives (i.e., raising x amount of money by date y, for an activist's legal defense fund). The other thing is the internet is awash with crap.What medium isn't? The fact that some ideologies are 'big on the internet', such as white nationalism or Holocaust denial, means they have become tarred with the same brush as porn, myspace teen antics and 9/11 conspiracy theories.Really? I doubt most people think about 'myspace teen antics' when they hear 'white nationalism' or 'Holocaust denial'! I'll grant an association with the 9/11 conspiracy theories, but that's largely because some of the same people promote those theories. Even if the Internet didn't exist, they'd do the same anyway. Oh, and Linder's strongly associated with interracial porn but that's because, well, he posted it on his website (but putting it in the Aryan Alternative toilet paper/tabloid would have had the same effect). :) They circulate almost exclusively within the internet, and not outside it.Which, again, is a problem with the organizations and not inherently with the Internet.

Sulla the Dictator
01-13-2007, 10:32 PM
This is true and there has never been a more glaring example such as yourself.


Really? What would be the consequences of me exploring your mild retardation in person, DWW? Would you hurt me or just cry, and make me look bad to your case worker?

Sulla the Dictator
01-13-2007, 10:34 PM
I think the argument that the internet is not representative of real life has perhaps aged and is no longer applicable. 10 years ago, when fewer people had an internet connection, that could be said. Now with 1.1 billion people using the internet times have changed.

This is fairly true, but that just requires us to focus rather than be so general. MOST people use the internet for rather mundane things; e-mail, bill paying, shopping, pornography.

The post by Milhouse fits more along the lines of BBs, which are much more like the Internet of old.

eggheadbanga
01-13-2007, 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milhouse Van Houten
The question is not whether the internet is representative of real life, but whether in fact the internet distracts from the real world.

As I've pointed out before, it's part of the real world and as with many toolsets, its degree of usefulness depends on the user.

Agreed, the internet is fantastic for research, but it should be patently obvious that much of what passes for WN ideology is in antipathy to the idea of there being such a thing as 'facts', since by ideological definition these 'facts' are controlled by the 'jewmedia' and other mythical unicorns and windmills.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milhouse Van Houten
If you have 10,000 people all posting on Stormfront 24-7, you actually don't have 10,000 people organising themselves politically. Internet activism is too often taken as a substitute for real activism.

You're missing the point that Internet activism can be real activism. Fundraising is an example that ought to be obvious. i.e. Free Republic raises a respectable amount of money, much of which likely ends up flowing into GOP coffers. There's also no requirement that Internet activism has to be done "24/7," or otherwise to the exclusion of other forms of activism. If utilized by a real organization, the Internet is going to be supplemental rather than exclusive. Real organizations don't exist only in cyberspace; when you see a supposed political party that exists only as a website, that's not a problem inherent to the 'net; that's a problem with the "party." Likewise, before the WWW there were "parties" and "movements" that existed only in college papers, idle daydreams, and so forth. You're blaming human failings on a technology that can be useful, but like other tools isn't always used effectively.

I've no doubt that politics will change because of the internet. What I question is whether the kinds of dreamer crackpot ideas - whether Trotskyism on one side, or white nationalism/neo-Nazism on the other - can hope to use this medium to gain any success outside of the internet.

A case in point: 9/11 conspiracy theories. These are arguably the first primarily internet-driven conspiracy theories of any degree of elaboration. Sure, there are the odd few books arguing along these lines, but the overwhelming majority of the action is online.

While you can point to this or that poll showing that x% of Americans are gullible enough to believe the theories, the fact is that the internet eventually ends up eating all such theories because of its transparency. The answer to a 'question' raised by a 9/11 Truther is invariably little more than a couple of clicks away.

Thus, the internet acts to accelerate the spread of specific ideas (memes, conspiracy theories) but eventually also contains them. This is most clearly seen in the case of 9/11 conspiracies, which have emerged, risen and fallen within the space of five years. The attempt has 'failed'. The majority of the population will never be convinced by these theories.

So if you have 10,000 people merely chit-chatting about trivia on a website, sure, they're not organizing themselves politically. But if you have an actual organization with effective leadership you can train those 10,000 people to use the Internet in accomplishing real political objectives (i.e., raising x amount of money by date y, for an activist's legal defense fund).

Sure, but I think you'll find that when 'marginal' parties like the NPD or BNP have had any apparent advances, it's because they've used old-fashioned campaigning methods.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milhouse Van Houten
The other thing is the internet is awash with crap.

What medium isn't?

The internet more than most, by all agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milhouse Van Houten
The fact that some ideologies are 'big on the internet', such as white nationalism or Holocaust denial, means they have become tarred with the same brush as porn, myspace teen antics and 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Really? I doubt most people think about 'myspace teen antics' when they hear 'white nationalism' or 'Holocaust denial'! I'll grant an association with the 9/11 conspiracy theories, but that's largely because some of the same people promote those theories. Even if the Internet didn't exist, they'd do the same anyway. Oh, and Linder's strongly associated with interracial porn but that's because, well, he posted it on his website (but putting it in the Aryan Alternative toilet paper/tabloid would have had the same effect).

OK, maybe 'myspace teen antics' was a bad example, and I did not mean to imply that white nationalism is equated with porn, rather, to imply that as with porn, white nationalism is associated with something that can be found on the internet, not something that can be found as a serious real-world movement.

One additional thing: it is striking how internet-based conspiracies and advocacies practically give away, even spam, their wares. This devalues them and renders them ultimately worthless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milhouse Van Houten
They circulate almost exclusively within the internet, and not outside it.

Which, again, is a problem with the organizations and not inherently with the Internet.

It is when the internet is mistaken for an 'organisation'.


Originally Posted by Sulla the Dictator

This is fairly true, but that just requires us to focus rather than be so general. MOST people use the internet for rather mundane things; e-mail, bill paying, shopping, pornography.

Precisely.

The post by Milhouse fits more along the lines of BBs, which are must more like the Internet of old.

That is a fair comparison. WNs and Holocaust deniers have been using the internet since the early 1990s. It has granted them digital immortality but little more.

Globus
01-14-2007, 01:17 AM
Not being ready to make aliyah yet, Israel is more a state of mind for Milhouse.

And a lifetime fixation for you, poor IB!

Globus
01-14-2007, 01:18 AM
You and me both homer, only I'd like something a little more messier than a simple cattle prod.

More messier, eh!

God, you fit the very stereotype.

Globus
01-14-2007, 01:20 AM
The word would be "jew" Egg, and there is a subtle difference between being "bright" and a clever liar, the latter of which your star outshines all others.

No one ever accused you of subtlety, DWW.