PDA

View Full Version : Sex lessons planned for five year old children


Felix the Cat
12-04-2005, 03:50 AM
Sex lessons planned for all children (http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1657308,00.html)

Compulsory sex lessons for primary school children as young as five are to be backed by the government's official advisers on sexual behaviour in an unpublished report obtained by The Observer. If accepted, the proposals would be the biggest shake-up in sex education in schools in England and Wales.

The document says the current system for sex lessons, which are mostly optional, is unfair, confused, damaging to pupils' health and development and partly responsible for Britain having the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in western Europe. At present all pupils get basic biological information, but those at some schools are also given details about subjects such as contraception and sexually transmitted infections.

A joint report from the Government's independent advisors on sexual health and teenage pregnancy recommends that detailed knowledge about sex should become a routine part of all pupils' education and points out that adopting such an approach makes young people better able to handle sexual issues. The 42 advisors include senior doctors, experts in sexual behaviour, specialists in bringing up children, nurses, and leading academics in the field.

They want ministers to make Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) a statutory subject in all primary and secondary schools in England and Wales. Certain schools provide PSHE to help prepare their students to understand the adult world of sex, alcohol, drugs and bullying.

The Sex and Relationship Education (SRE) element of PSHE includes much more in-depth discussion about sexual activity than the factual reproductive biology all pupils cover in science lessons as well as tuition on how to deal with pressure from friends or partners to have sex, where to get contraception and how infections such as chlamydia and genital warts are passed on.

The report, 'Personal, Social and Health Education in schools: Time for Action', has been compiled by the Independent Advisory Groups on Sexual Health and Teenage Pregnancy, which advise the Department of Health and the Department for Education and Skills.

Labour peer Joyce Gould, who chaired the inquiry, said last night that the government should make PSHE a statutory part of the national curriculum in order to tackle the high number of teenage girls becoming pregnant, the rising levels of sexually transmitted infections and widespread ignorance among young people about sex.

Gould denied the group's proposals would encourage promiscuity. 'Some people will say that if you don't tell them about it, they won't do it. But real life shows that's not the case. More and more young people are having sex at a younger age.'

If implemented, primary school children would be taught mainly about emotional issues such as relationships and friendships, with older ones starting to learn about puberty. Only secondary students would discuss sexual activity and its potential pitfalls.

Gill Frances, the acting chairwoman of the teenage pregnancy advisors, said SRE was vital to help pupils understand complicated sexual issues. 'Young people are growing up in an increasingly sexualised society, where there are mixed messages about sex. The result is that they end up confused because they don't understand what sex is all about.'

Frances said that mandatory PSHE would make many young people more likely to postpone their first sexual experience, and more confident at engaging with the opposite sex. The report shows that teenage pregnancy in Liverpool, Bradford and Hackney, in east London, fell after local schools introduced PSHE and SRE.

Members of the two advisory groups believe that junior ministers at the DFES and DoH, such as Beverley Hughes, the minister for children, young people and families, and public health minister Caroline Flint, are sympathetic to their plea. But education secretary Ruth Kelly, a devout Catholic, is thought likely to oppose such a dramatic extension of pupils' knowledge about sex. The growing number of faith schools could also make implementing PSHE difficult. Parents can currently remove a child from SRE if they are unhappy with the content.

Vindex
12-04-2005, 04:12 AM
After reading this it seems like they are just going to tell them about the basic facts of life and how they got here. Not pull out a copy of the kama sutra.

Felix the Cat
12-04-2005, 04:34 AM
Thin end of the wedge, Dr. A

Felix the Cat
12-05-2005, 06:03 AM
(I'm glad to see Blair is now backpedalling vigorously)

Government rejects advisors' call for primary sex lessons (http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=VLWRLTLF3G5UHQFIQMGSFF4AVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2005/12/05/nsexed05.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/12/05/ixnewstop.html)

The Government distanced itself yesterday from a report by its own advisors recommending that sex education in primary schools should be made compulsory.

Under the proposals, due for publication next month but leaked this weekend, 10- and 11-year-olds would be taught about puberty, followed in secondary school by wider instruction in relationships, sexual activity and associated risks such as teenage pregnancy and disease.

In addition, children as young as five would be instructed in friendships, relationships and bullying.

The measures are intended to cut both the rate of teenage pregnancy in Britain, the highest in Western Europe, and the number of cases of sexually transmitted disease.

When asked if parents would be allowed to veto such instruction, a spokesman for the authors, the two government-appointed independent advisory groups on sexual health and teenage pregnancy, replied: "I don't believe they would."

The bodies believe that the current system, which imposes a statutory responsibility on secondary schools to offer sex education while allowing parents to opt out of most of it if they wish, is confusing and unfair to children. They want it to be a compulsory ingredient of the national curriculum.

A spokesman for the Department for Education said: "We don't comment on leaked reports but there are no plans to change our current policy."

Observers will be left wondering why the Government deemed it necessary to set up two advisory bodies only to reject their findings before publication. It has been suggested that such reports allow ministers to gauge the reaction to such changes before deciding policy.

The report, Personal, Social and Health Education in Schools: Time for Action, is the latest attempt by the advisory bodies, made up of doctors, nurses and other experts, to push through compulsory teaching.

A spokesman for the bodies said the proposals were intended to form part of a course in "life skills" covering a child's entire school career.

In addition to sex education, pupils would also learn about drug abuse, binge drinking and how to manage their finances.

The spokesman added: "If this thing went ahead it would represent a huge sea change which one hopes would have a huge impact on teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease, allowing young people to make informed decisions before they become sexually active."

Baroness Gould, the chairman of the independent advisory group on sexual health, said: "Some people will say that if you don't tell them about it, they won't do it. But real life shows that's not the case. More and more young people are having sex at a younger age."

However, the Tory MP Ann Widdecombe said: "There is too much sex education already. It is a silly idea which will lead only to a rise in teenage pregnancies. We didn't have it in my day and we were better off for it."