PDA

View Full Version : Racial acceptance?


MrAngry
02-16-2007, 09:31 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?

Given that this may be the case would it be better to improve society in a pragmatic and peaceful manner?

Micaelis
02-16-2007, 09:44 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?

Given that this may be the case would it be better to improve society in a pragmatic and peaceful manner?

The economic success of the West and its first-world position is what attracts diverse racial elements. In Rome, for instance, after the fall of the empire and the migration of its wealth to the east, the inhabitants were reduced to mostly Italian herders with their barbaric overlords.

If capital in the West is to remain relatively abundant, then I agree that a peaceful multiracialism should be cultivated, though the native inhabitants should be prioritised and miscegenation should not be favoured or enforced between groups.

kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman
02-16-2007, 10:34 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?

Given that this may be the case would it be better to improve society in a pragmatic and peaceful manner?
I think multicuturalists will always exists and racists always will exist. We will always battle each other.

Hopefully our side will be able to get the upper hand at some point.

shanemac
02-16-2007, 10:50 PM
Multiracialism is here to stay. That's pretty much unavoidable given the voting system in the west that allows the unthinking, uneducated masses to decide the future of our nations.

So the only questions left are:
1. How much multiracialism do we want?
2. What will be the composition of racial minorites?

1. In my opinion, we should aim to minimise multiracialism. That may be done by severely restricting non-white immigration.

2. If we are going to have non-white immigration, we should ensure that no one single ethnic group builds up numbers enough to challenge white hegemony in our nations. As well as this, we should try to minimise the numbers of violent and low-iq racial groups (niggers, sand-niggers) and sway the balance in favour of higher-iq non-violent types (Orientals (rice niggers), Indians (curry-niggers, prairie-niggers).

Keystone
02-16-2007, 11:00 PM
2. If we are going to have non-white immigration, we should ensure that no one single ethnic group builds up numbers enough to challenge white hegemony in our nations.
White folks have to start having more babies too, Jewzu.
As well as this, we should try to minimise the numbers of violent and low-iq racial groups (niggers, sand-niggers) and sway the balance in favour of higher-iq non-violent types (Orientals (rice niggers), Indians (curry-niggers, prairie-niggers).
American niggers are only about 12% of the population (or so I've heard for ages). They keep their own numbers down by killing each other.

The Mexican injuns are the worst threat, as I see it.

Starr
02-16-2007, 11:02 PM
Too much "diversity" and multiculturalism and all of the laws that are enacted to force people to get along are possibly going to be the straw that break's the camel's back. People can be a bit more accepting of smaller numbers of people of other races and cultures living around them, and when their numbers are small, these people are not going to have much of a real choice but to try to adapt to your way of life as best as they can. but since everyone needs their own place where their culture is the dominant one, when you get larger amounts of different people together and the whole fabric of your society beings to change(and they, with the strength of their numbers, begin to want to force their culture and way of life on your society) this is going to result in a possible massive conflict at some point.

Nothing can truly be called "here to stay." I would bet that people living in any given time, who grew up experiencing no other kind of society, might believe their type of society and the ideas of their day were "here to stay" also(since they are so far removed from and cannot properly relate to anything else) and we can see how incorrect that usually is.

The Mexican injuns are the worst threat, as I see it.

Agreed.

kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman
02-16-2007, 11:05 PM
Too much multiculturalism and all of the laws that are enacted to force people to get along are possibly going to be the straw the break's the camel's back. People can be a bit more accepting of smaller numbers of people of other races and cultures living around them, and when their numbers are small, these people are not going to have much of a real choice but to try to adapt to your way of life as best as they can. but since everyone needs their own place where their culture is the dominant one, when you get larger amounts of different people together and the whole fabric of your society beings to change, this is going to result in a possible massive conflict at some point.
As Taylor says, people are forced to assimilate when they are here in small numbers. But as the numbers of the minority grows, a stronger cleavage between the two populations starts to occur.

He says this as when he was in Japan, he was forced to assimilate. But he imagined that if there had been more whites, that may had not been the case.

Mackie
02-17-2007, 05:59 PM
Meh. Its just a fad, it'll fade.
I hardly think its going to stay, to be honest.

Fenris
02-17-2007, 06:48 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?
How many multiculturalists think that the West is here to stay?

Starr
02-17-2007, 06:54 PM
How many multiculturalists think that the West is here to stay?


How many multiculturalists think the pro-diversity mindset or multiculturalism is here to stay? Any percieved threat against it or any act or indication that says we can't all just get along gets quite an insane reaction from them. The enforcement of the particular insanity known as "policial correctness" shows how unstable they believe the whole foundation is.

Francis
02-17-2007, 06:59 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?

I find this a strange question as, in it's current form, multiracialism is not only destined to perish, but the decline has already clearly begun. Any observer of modern opinions and politics can tell you that.

It's always been a fact, in most western nations, that the majority of people are opposed to multiracialism of the degree that would alter their nations in an irreversible manner, eroding what they see as it's culture, heritage, and history.

That is not an opinion, that is the result of research, surveys and polls over the history of multiracialism.

There has never been a time where the majority of people have publicly supported wholesale immigration, or multiracialism, that would change things in the way that things have begun to change.

The difference now is that things are reaching what people percieve to be a critical mass, where they move their position from that of a disgruntled voice, to one of active opposition.

You fly the British flag, didn't you observe the last general election in Britain?

Labour, pledged to reduce immigration.

Conservatives, pledged to dramatically reduce immigration, and curb political correctness.

UKIP, pledged to withdraw Britain from europe, reduce immigration, and curb political correctness.

Veritas, pledged to withdraw Britain from europe, reduce immigration, and curb political correctness.

BNP, pledged to withdraw Britain from europe, reduce immigration, and curb political correctness.

NF, pledged to withdraw Britain from europe, reduce immigration, and curb political correctness.

EFP, pledged to withdraw Britain from europe, reduce immigration, and curb political correctness.

That's about 80% or more of the public voting against immigration, political correctness, and modern multiracialism.

It maybe not be a vote for White Nationalism, or racialism, but it's certainly a vote against open borders, and a completely multiracialist society.

I don't recall who, or what parties, stood on a pro-multiracialism ticket, but I do know that the vast majority of people did not vote for them.

The same results are repeated all over Europe, very, very, very few people are actually in favor of, or support, open borders, and a completely multiracial society.

That opposition has grown, as multiracialism has taken hold, and will continue to grow, if multiracialism continues to grow, or is maintained in it's present form.

This is basic knowledge, quantified by research, and acknowledged by every competent person in politics, regardless of political color or affiliation, which is why even the mainstream parties are talking tough on these issues now.

As has been said by others, multiracialism is a fad, and it's a fad that has had it's day, so much so that even most anti-racists now acknowledge that things have to change.

The debate is not will multiracialism perish, in it's present form, but where on the political spectrum we move to next, to racial separatism, of one form or another, to something fairly similar to where we were a year or two ago, or somewhere else on the spectrum between those two points.

I know what position I favor, but sadly no one has appointed me King yet, so I don't get to pick, only to try and influence.

Vindex
02-17-2007, 07:07 PM
What is ment by racial acceptance is that Whites accept their slow genocide by non-White alien flooding of their lands. Just as a rapist would want rapist acceptance as his victims are easy to destory and victimize.

What is already happening is that the massive alien flood and anti-White laws are creating a backlash that will put Nationalist parties into power which will put the boot to the asses of the aliens.

harjit
02-17-2007, 08:51 PM
As well as this, we should try to minimise the numbers of violent and low-iq racial groups (niggers, sand-niggers) and sway the balance in favour of higher-iq non-violent types (Orientals (rice niggers), Indians (curry-niggers, prairie-niggers).
:rofl:
Can I get to be a chicken tikka masala nigger instead?

Winston
02-17-2007, 08:58 PM
:rofl:
Can I get to be a chicken tikka masala nigger instead?

How about a naan nigger?

harjit
02-17-2007, 09:07 PM
How about a naan nigger?
That could work, yes.

But enough about me, what kind of nigger is Jenna Fischer?

Francis
02-17-2007, 10:08 PM
:rofl:
Can I get to be a chicken tikka masala nigger instead?

You think this is going to be some kind of democracy?

You can wear the title of Rogan Josh nigger, and like it!

Mackie
02-18-2007, 08:13 AM
:rofl:
Can I get to be a chicken tikka masala nigger instead?
Ahhah xD
Very few things make me actually laugh out loud, a good one harjit... :D


But seriously though, heres a thread i posted a while ago about finland and attitude towards things related to this thread
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=19519

Basil Fawlty
02-18-2007, 12:10 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?

Given that this may be the case would it be better to improve society in a pragmatic and peaceful manner?Multiracialism/multiculturalism is entirely bound up with capitalism. There is good reason to believ that the international capitalist system is approaching its shelf-life thanks to the limitations imposed by mother nature. Once it goes, so too will liberalism-multiculturalism.

Dr. Gutberlet
02-18-2007, 11:44 PM
How many racist Phorans accept that multiracialism is here to stay in the West even thought they may not like it?

Given that this may be the case would it be better to improve society in a pragmatic and peaceful manner?

If I wanted to live in Brasil, I'd move there. I do not wish my country to be a haven for the kaffe coloured. This sickening trend will end once all of the secular humanist liberal vermin are only found in a history book.

Kriger
02-19-2007, 09:40 AM
EXCERPT:
Given that this may be the case would it be better to improve society in a pragmatic and peaceful manner?

You need to explain to certain race groups what is meant by pragmatic and peaceful. Many of them do not seem to be getting the basic drift. I, for one, am not interested in adopting another culture as my own in the name of either pragmatism or peace. I really do not care if they want their own cultures. It is really best for them if they did. But expecting us to adopt their language and their culture is going a bit far. American White is the dominant culture here, whether they like it or not.

What culture have you adopted?

By the way, I liked your bear avatar better.