Lawrence Auster's Blog

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

Good Lawrence Auster quotes:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/005166.html
The problem is that the Dukes of the world take that ball and run with it over a cliff, putting too much blame on Jews for things whites Gentiles were indispensible in doing to our race, and blaming Jews for things they were not responble for at all.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/005153.html
culminating in a three-minute harangue by him from the floor during the question period on the last day, in which, according to someone at the conference, he expatiated on the only subject that is of interest to him, the supposedly alien and illegitimate presence of the Jews in America. Of course, as far as Duke is concerned, Jews are an alien and illegitimate presence in Israel as well;

[Felix the Cat]

I used to browse his site, but the obsession with Jews and Israel became annoying after a while

He seems to have toned it down since then

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

That seems odd to me.

You know he is of jewish decent and converted to Christianity, right? It would surprise me if ever hated jews. Unless he converted for that reason. He seemed to be against Duke's anti-semetism.

[Felix the Cat]

He is VERY pro Jewish

There was a point (around a year ago) when it seemed every other post on his blog was about Jews, antisemitism or Israel

[Count Sudoku]

His site is useful for WN in that it is more politically incorrect than any MSM entity yet not so politically incorrect to scare away potential recruits. Sort of like Steve Sailor.

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

His site is useful for WN
I wonder if he would take issue with you using that term to describe him...as even a jewish convert to christianity is still jewish in the eyes of nazism, and wn, is no doubt, a movement which is closely linked to nazism.

I don't use the term wn to describe myself.

[Count Sudoku]

I wonder if he would take issue with you using that term to describe him...as even a jewish convert to christianity is still jewish in the eyes of nazism, and wn, is no doubt, a movement which is closely linked to nazism.

I don't use the term wn to describe myself.

Anything that gets white people to raise their racial awareness is useful unless it's used to guilt them into bending over even more for minorities. Perhaps I am using the term WN too loosely.

[Mike]

You got the gist CC. Lawrence Auster is a perfect example of how Jews diligently forward Jewish interests by infiltrating every niche. Like 99% of Jews who at first glance appear to be "with us" on conservative concerns and national identity issues, his basic goal is to make Jews look good, and nothing else. Mind you, the Jews who seem at least somewhat "with us" are relatively rare to start with. The ones who actually support the White country they were born in over the Jewish particularism they get with their mothers' milk are vanishingly rare, for practical purposes nonexistent in fact.

Jews can possibly be bargained with, but they can never be trusted or treated as fellow Whites. As Joseph Sobran rightfully pointed out, you can agree with a Jewish "conservative" on nine out of ten issues, but if the tenth issue involves Israel, then the other nine count for nothing. He will hate you and fight you with every means at his disposal. If you doubt it, just give Auster a try. You'll see.

He is VERY pro Jewish

There was a point (around a year ago) when it seemed every other post on his blog was about Jews, antisemitism or Israel

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006916.html

In fact, the fondest desire of the anti-Semites, short of their desire to see Jews disappear from the earth, is their desire to get themselves included in relatively mainstream discussion so they will have a chance to get someone other than themselves to listen to their obsessive explanation of the universe. The anti-Semites’ constant undying complaint is that they are being unfairly excluded, because other people can’t handle their great and irrefutable arguments. In fact they are excluded because they are actually are what they accuse Jews of being—a poisonous form of sub-humanity, from which normal humans are instinctively repelled. That is why the anti-Semites’ greatest desire is to be accepted, because acceptance would appear to wipe out the actual reality of what they are.

A few years ago, we had a thread (http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001646.html) at VFR concerning a pro-Nazi website, the prominently posted slogan of which was “No Jews. Just right.” Several of the supporters of the website including the editor showed up at VFR, said their usual things, and then were outraged that I cut them off. Finally I said to them, You don’t want to have anything to do with Jews, so why are you so eager to post at this website which is run by a person of Jewish ancestry? That shut them up, and I never heard from them again.

No Jew-haters. Just right.

Nazis try to force themselves on mainstream organizations with tenacity, and this is harmful to those organizations. These organizations must fight back!

[Winston]

Auster's philosemitism, while making his work palatable to a wider audience, must be viewed with the same suspicion as any philosemitism coming from anyone. He does hit the mark sometimes, though.
Quote:


The exchange confirms my long held view that Jeff Jacoby is a thoughtless person whose mind is impermeable to any ideas about immigration other than open-borders clichés. That he calls himself a “staunch conservative” is a bad joke. His basis for calling himself a conservative is that he advocates “full-bore assimilation and Americanization.” At the same time he says that we should be as open to the importation of immigrants as we are to the importation of goods—in other words, he supports virtually open borders. But how can there be “full-bore assimilation” if we have virtually open borders? Only a mindless person could believe such a thing.

And what are Jacoby's pro-immigration arguments? That the percentage of immigrants now is no greater than it was 100 years ago. Yes, but that was at the height of immigration. Should that be the standard? In any case, it doesn’t tell us anything about the actual effect of the present immigration on America. He doesn’t know and doesn’t pretend to know anything about how immigration is changing America. He just sings the Jewish open borders song, making the immigration of a hundred years ago that brought his own ancestors here the argument for open immigration today.

As I’ve said before, if America had known, when it admitted all those Jews in the late 19th and early 20th century (including my ancestors), that their descendants would insist that the immigration into America of their ancestors meant that America must leave its borders open forever, would America have let those Jews in?

The basic problem is that many American Jews—and Jacoby habitually puts his own Jewishness front and foremost in his columns—do not look at immigration in terms of how it affects America; they look at immigration as a symbol affirming their own worth as Jews in America.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/007509.html

You see, a fundamental incompatibility with our racialist views runs right through the Jewish psyche. Sure, you can name a bunch of Jews who buck the trend, (some of them post here and I am fond of them) but an individual so motivated could create a list of fairly dazzling negro intellects, too.

It is the unique Jewish perspective, together with their intelligence and talent for making their own causes the causes to which everyone scurries about to support, which make Jews dangerous, and on the whole quite incompatible with any racialist idea of how the west should be run. I will sit tight in my own position; it is they who must change, not me. Their whiteness is a red herring that only the very dull-minded focus on.

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

Sam Francis is right that Catholics and Libertarians, and not Jews, are most responsible for open borders if you had to pick a group of people, not that I agree in constantly pointing fingers as such isn't conducive to the construction of a movement.

BTW Mike you are on ignore, cuz I couldn't give a f*ck about you. Knowing your persistant and annoying personality, you are probably doing this :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked:

[Leonard Smalls]

Jews can possibly be bargained with, but they can never be trusted or treated as fellow Whites. As Joseph Sobran rightfully pointed out, you can agree with a Jewish "conservative" on nine out of ten issues, but if the tenth issue involves Israel, then the other nine count for nothing. He will hate you and fight you with every means at his disposal. If you doubt it, just give Auster a try. You'll see.

Sobran is a vehement antisemite thus anything he states regarding Jews should not be trusted.

[Mike]

Actually, I believe you can create a list of "fairly dazzling negro intellects" as lot easier than you could create a list of genuine Jewish partisans of the White West. Take Lawrence Auster's blog as an example. All the guy yaps about is Jewish concerns: the automatic badness of antisemitism and the inherent goodness of Israel are his most passionate themes. Oh yeah, he yaps about the threat of Muslim immigration too. But given the context of his overarching Zionist love of Israel, can anyone doubt that he cares not so much for the demographic fate of the West, but rather the necessity of maintaining support for Israel? If Lawrence Auster is the best example of a "good Jew" that the philosemites can trot out, then there are no good Jews. How can any rational philosemite present LA as a "good jew" with a straight face?

By the way, I happen to know that you can find those very rare Jews who care about the White West and place that care over their Jewish origin. I have met exactly one of these Jews in rl, so I know they exist. They are generally called "self-hating Jews". I feel sorry for these rare creatures. But LA is not one of them.Sure, you can name a bunch of Jews who buck the trend, (some of them post here and I am fond of them) but an individual so motivated could create a list of fairly dazzling negro intellects, too.

[Mike]

BTW Mike you are on ignore, cuz I couldn't give a f*ck about you. Knowing your persistant and annoying personality, you are probably doing this :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked: :hijacked:
Then you are weak, because no one on this forum has me on ignore other than you (to the best of my knowledge). I do not hijack threads, and I did not hijack this thread; each of my posts is directly on the topic of Lawrence Auster, and thus germaine.

[Winston]

Actually, I believe you can create a list of "fairly dazzling negro intellects" as lot easier than you could create a list of genuine Jewish partisans of the White West. Take Lawrence Auster's blog as an example. All the guy yaps about is Jewish concerns: the automatic badness of antisemitism and the inherent goodness of Israel are his most passionate themes. Oh yeah, he yaps about the threat of Muslim immigration too. But given the context of his overarching Zionist love of Israel, can anyone doubt that he cares not so much for the demographic fate of the West, but rather the necessity of maintaining support for Israel? If Lawrence Auster is the best example of a "good Jew" that the philosemites can trot out, then there are no good Jews. How can any rational philosemite present LA as a "good jew" with a straight face?

By the way, I happen to know that you can find those very rare Jews who care about the White West and place that care over their Jewish origin. I have met exactly one of these Jews in rl, so I know they exist. They are generally called "self-hating Jews". I feel sorry for these rare creatures. But LA is not one of them.

Yes, I agree with you. IMO Thaumiel on here is an example of one of those Jews, at least if you believe he is sincere, as I do. For the most part though, Jews are a thorn in the side of white identity politics, no matter how many books Michael Levin might write.

Then you are weak, because no one on this forum has me on ignore other than you. I do not hijack threads, and I did not hijack this thread; each of my posts is directly on the topic of Lawrence Auster, and thus germaine.

Yes. This is a thread about LA's blog in general, rather than any specific column he has written. Discussion of the man and his motives is bang on topic.

[Mike]

Sobran is a reasonable and moderate person. "Antisemite" is a childish smear that should generally be ignored.

Sobran is a vehement antisemite thus anything he states regarding Jews should not be trusted.

[kane123123/Eagle Eye/stumbler/iceman]

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/#008096
Buchanan says thanks
Last year Patrick Buchanan sent me a copy of his book State of Emergency with this inscription:


To Lawrence Auster,
Whose brave book, The Path to National Suicide, helped to frame my own views fifteen years ago. Thanks for your courageous writing on the issue of American identity. Pat Buchanan, Aug. 27, 2006.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at 10:08 AM

Yesterday I said people with high goals who really want to go somewhere should try to influence people like Buchanan and Coulter and essentially VNN and Stormfront aren't necessary, they are quite useless. It appears Auster has.

So all these hypocritcal Jew bashes who support Bucahnan don't realize that Jews have influenced Buchanan.

[il ragno]

Yesterday I said people with high goals who really want to go somewhere should try to influence people like Buchanan and Coulter and essentially VNN and Stormfront aren't necessary, they are quite useless. It appears Auster has.

Help us, Obiwan - you're our only hope!