PDA

View Full Version : Where Are All The Workers? Companies worldwide scrambling to manage a labor crunch


Thinker
03-31-2007, 03:50 AM
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_15/b4029050.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_businessweek+exclusives

http://images.businessweek.com/common_images/bw_logo1.gif
APRIL 9, 2007
NEWS & INSIGHTS
Where Are All The Workers?
Companies worldwide are suddenly scrambling to manage a labor crunch

Employers in some unlikely places say they're having trouble filling jobs. Factory managers in Ho Chi Minh City report many of their $62-a-month workers went home for the Tet holiday in February and never came back. In Bulgaria, computer experts are in such demand they can't be bothered to answer the want ads of a Los Angeles movie studio. And in Peoria, Caterpillar Inc. is struggling to train enough service technicians. The problem in each case: not enough people who are both able and willing to do the work for the posted pay. "We've got a global problem...and it's only going to continue to get worse," says Stephen Hitch, a human resources manager at Caterpillar.

A global labor crunch, already being felt by some employers, appears to have intensified in recent months. That's in spite of widely publicized layoffs, including Citigroup's plans to shed as many as 15,000 staffers. In fact, U.S. unemployment remains low--just 4.5% in February--and even companies in countries with higher jobless rates are feeling pinched. "It's not just a U.S. phenomenon," says Jeffrey A. Joerres, CEO of Manpower Inc., the staffing agency. On Mar. 29, Manpower was to release the results of a survey of nearly 37,000 employers in 27 countries. The study found that 41% of them are having trouble hiring the people they need.

What's going on here? With global growth running at a strong 5% a year since 2004, the strategies that companies developed to hold down labor costs--including offshoring work to low-wage countries--are running out of gas far sooner than many expected. The seemingly inexhaustible pools of cheap labor from China, India, and elsewhere are drying up as demand outstrips the supply of people with the needed skills. "Companies were hoping they wouldn't have to worry about human resources at all," says Peter Cappelli, director of the Center for Human Resources at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. "Now they do."

Corporations are determined to keep labor costs under control, so they're reaching deeper into their bag of tricks. Some are doing more in-house training so they don't have to recruit pricey talent on the open market. Some are lowering their standards for new hires or moving operations to virgin territories other outsourcers haven't discovered, such as the Belarusian capital, Minsk, or smaller cities in Bulgaria and Romania.

WRITE YOUR OWN TICKET

For now, though, workers with skills that are in short supply are enjoying the ride. If you're a petroleum engineer in Colorado, where energy companies such as Shell, EnCana, and Halliburton are hiring like mad, you can write your own ticket. Even unskilled workers are being snapped up, says Sue Tuffin, director of the Mesa County Workforce Center in Grand Junction, Colo. "Parents are trying to convince kids to stay in school," she says, but the lure of the gas fields is strong: "You can go to work on a drill rig with no training and make $30 an hour." Pittsburgh-based Consol Energy Inc. is so desperate for coal miners that it's staging a media campaign that includes billboards, the Internet, and its first-ever television commercials. In agriculture, the crackdown on illegal immigration has dried up farm labor so much that crops were left rotting in the fields last year. Even Michigan, which has the nation's highest unemployment rate, is reaching out to migrant farmworkers from Texas and, soon, Florida. Its slogan is "Venga a Michigan"--Spanish for "Come to Michigan."

The job U.S. employers say is hardest to fill is sales representative. The trouble is, companies can't find people with the technical expertise and business savvy to explain complex products to customers, Manpower says. Right behind them on U.S. employers' wish lists are teachers, mechanics, and technicians. "There are certain professions where skills are in such demand that even average or below-average people can get hired," says Michael Alter, president of SurePayroll Inc., which keeps tabs on the labor market as it processes small-business payrolls.

Economists, of course, will tell you there's no such thing as a labor shortage. From a worker's viewpoint, many so-called shortages could quickly be solved if employers were to offer more money. And worldwide, millions of people still can't find jobs. The strongest evidence that there's no general shortage today is that overall worker pay has barely outpaced inflation. In the U.S., the share of national income going to corporate profit, rather than, say, labor, is hovering around a 50-year high. With so many people newly available for work in China, India, and the former Soviet Union, the only thing that could cause a real shortage would be "a global pandemic that kills millions of people," Harvard University economist Richard B. Freeman wrote in a research paper in September.

But try telling that to employers whose workforce strategies, developed for a period of surplus labor, don't fit the new realities. The challenge is finding people who can do the jobs on offer. Manufacturers in Japan are suffering a lack of skilled workers because of the country's aging population as well as downsizing during the 1990s. "Now they're paying the price for not developing human resources," says Hisashi Yamada, an economist at the Japanese Research Institute in Tokyo.

China, although far more youthful than Japan, could soon feel the same pinch. Sure, its biggest problem at the moment continues to be creating jobs for the millions of workers pouring into cities, and wages are barely rising overall. But that may be starting to change as the government boosts incentives for people to stay in rural areas and most factories remain concentrated in a few coastal regions. In an article published in early March in the China Daily, Beijing economist Cai Fang said China is approaching a "Lewisian Turning Point." That's a reference to the late Nobel laureate Sir Arthur Lewis, who said a developing nation's industrial wages begin to rise quickly at the point when the supply of surplus labor from the countryside tapers off.

Cost-conscious employers around the world are fighting to hold the line on labor. In Japan, the core rate of inflation in January was precisely zero, in part because corporations are keeping wage increases to a minimum. Instead, Japanese businesses are going with other gambits, such as hiring temps full-time, increasing mechanization, offshoring work, and rehiring retirees. Toyota Motor Corp., for instance, is asking some workers over 60 to delay their retirement for a year or more. In Europe, Swiss staffing company Adecco is teaching Polish carpenters to speak Norwegian so they can fill construction jobs in Oslo.

Caterpillar, meanwhile, is redoubling training. A network of vocational schools in six countries teaches a Caterpillar-approved curriculum, and students enter it with a dealership already committed to hiring them. They will spend up to half their time in apprenticeships at Cat dealers, learning on the job.

The labor squeeze in India gets lots of attention. Oddly, though, Manpower's survey found that employers in India reported the least problems filling jobs: Just 9% said they had difficulty, vs. 41% in the U.S. and 82% in Mexico. The explanation? Manpower's staff thinks turnover is so rapid in India that employers figure if they really need to fill a job, they'll lure someone away from another company. But stealing scarce talent from rivals isn't a strategy for the long run. That's why employers are on an all-out campaign to increase training and raise education levels. While India produces 400,000 engineering graduates a year, few have the skills and language abilities to work in an advanced multinational corporation. Some 1.3 million people applied to tech-services giant Infosys Technologies Ltd. (INFY ) last year, for instance, but the company says only 2% of those were employable. For business, it seems, there's no shortage of work involved in easing worker shortages.

Thinker
03-31-2007, 03:56 AM
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/mar2007/gb20070329_538311.htm

Desperately Seeking Bulgarian Programmers
As big IT companies flood the region, skilled workers are getting harder to find
by Jack Ewing

Wanted: programmers. Chance to inhale a whiff of Hollywood, dream up special effects for films, and make decent money to boot. Sounds like a pretty good gig, especially in Sofia, the bleak capital of Bulgaria, the poorest country in the European Union. But Los Angeles-based Nu Image, which operates a low-cost production center in Sofia, isn't exactly facing a stampede of computer grads to help it digitally enhance films such as the latest Rambo sequel. In fact, Scott Coulter, visual effects producer for Nu Image, says his help-wanted ads sometimes get zero response. "I'm having a hell of a time," he says.

If you're a Bulgarian programmer, a Romanian network-systems engineer, or a Czech enterprise-software specialist, life is good. Salaries for information technology workers in Central Europe are rising by double digits annually as multinationals such as Hewlett-Packard, SAP, and Dell dive into the region, soaking up what was supposed to be a deep pool of math and science graduates willing to work for a third of what their Western European counterparts are paid.

As it turns out, the supply of qualified labor is proving surprisingly finite. And it's not just IT specialists, but also managers, accountants, engineers, and more. Call-center managers or IT directors in Poland can cost companies more than $100,000 a year including benefits, while even call center operators cost up to $23,000, staffing company Adecco says. So big companies are paying more and migrating to the hinterlands to find good, low-cost labor. Finnish mobile-phone maker Nokia, which already employs nearly 5,000 people in Hungary, announced on Mar. 26 it will build a new handset factory in Romania. And New Jersey-based EPAM Systems, which develops software for the likes of Microsoft and SAP, is scouting locations in Russia.

The problem is most acute for smaller companies that don't have the cachet and resources of the big multinationals. Many have already been priced out of the capitals. Hilscher, a fast-growing German maker of communications gear, chose to locate a new development center in Varna, a city on Bulgaria's Black Sea coast that is home to a technical school. "There's too much competition in Sofia," says Oleksandr Shcherbina, Hilscher's quality chief.

Local IT executives already know they need to compete on more than just price. "If you build your economic model only around low-cost labor, you have a three- or four-year window where you have an advantage," says Sasha Bezuhanova, head of Hewlett-Packard's operations in Bulgaria. HP, which plans to expand to more than 1,000 employees in Sofia by yearend, from 600 today, is subsidizing computer courses at local universities to ensure a steady flow of workers.

Employers in Central Europe not only compete with each other but with Western Europe. Romania's shortage of skilled labor has been aggravated by the estimated 2.5 million citizens--out of a population of 22.3 million--who have decamped for work abroad. But the globalizing labor market can help, too. Bulgarian Andrey Kalo spent nearly a dozen years at various jobs in San Francisco before HP lured him back to his native Sofia to help manage servers for big customers. The pay is a bit less, but the low cost of living means he can afford a better lifestyle. Says Kalo: "I'm quite happy to be back."

Thinker
04-02-2007, 02:24 AM
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/309760_biotechshortage31.html

Last updated March 30, 2007 8:45 p.m. PT
Shortage of scientists threatens biotech boom
By LUKE TIMMERMAN
BLOOMBERG NEWS

Biotechnology companies, including Genentech Inc. and Gilead Sciences Inc., can't find enough scientists to hire, threatening to slow one of the industries bolstering U.S. job growth.

Genentech's work force doubled in the past four years to 10,500 and may rise 11 percent this year -- if managers can locate biomedical scientists.

Gilead bought two companies last year, partly to get 200 skilled employees.

The biotech business, which generated $51 billion in U.S. sales in 2005, is one of the fastest-growing U.S. industries, creating 40,000 jobs from 2001 to 2004, according to Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio.

Genentech says the lack of qualified applicants means the company is "scrambling" to grow. A drop over the past decade in the percentage of U.S. college graduates pursuing science is making the task harder.

"The big failing is in education, not only postgrad but also undergraduate, and even K-12," Robert Reich, the former U.S. labor secretary who is a professor at the University of California-Berkeley, said in an e-mail. "We do a lousy job of training our kids to be scientists."

About 1.2 million people held biotech jobs in the U.S. in 2004, in agriculture, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and medical laboratories, Battelle says. Biotechnology involves the manipulation of proteins that form the building blocks of living organisms to develop drugs and vaccines. About 25 percent of U.S. biotech jobs are in California, according to the California Healthcare Institute.

Gilead, based in Foster City, Calif., says it must expand its work force by about 10 percent this year from 2,515 to deliver on investor expectations that revenue grow by about a third. Analysts estimated that Gilead's sales, which more than tripled in the past four years, will rise 30 percent in 2007, based on the average of 28 estimates in a Bloomberg survey.

Genentech, in South San Francisco, Calif., needs to recruit more than 1,000 people annually to keep up the momentum of the past three years, when revenue tripled to $9.28 billion, company officials said. Sales will rise 26 percent this year, based on the average estimate of 30 analysts.

"We're hiring as many good people as we can out there, but there's not an infinite number of terrific people," Art Levinson, chief executive officer of Genentech, said at an investor conference.

Biotech companies, which have produced some of the world's best-selling drugs to treat cancer, arthritis and AIDS, have long complained of a shortage of available scientists. Companies such as Genentech and Amgen Inc., the world's biggest biotech company, have given millions of dollars to schools for science education.

Last August, Genentech made 25 grants totaling $1.2 million for science programs near its California headquarters.

Amgen pledged $25 million in October for an eight-year program pairing science undergraduates with researchers at schools including Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif., and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass.

Biotech companies that can't hire in the U.S. will recruit foreign workers or open research centers overseas, Reich said. U.S. workers stand to miss out because the average biotech job pays $65,775 a year, compared with $39,003 in the overall private sector, according to the April 2006 study by Battelle.

Gilead and Genentech declined to say how many jobs they are filling with foreign-born or foreign-educated workers. About a third of Gilead's work force is outside the U.S., and the company is expanding in Europe, spokeswoman Erin Edgley said.

"It's hard to find enough people to grow the way we want," said John Milligan, chief operating officer of Gilead, the world's second-biggest seller of HIV drugs behind London-based GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Instead of just hiring one at a time, Gilead has also acquired groups of workers elsewhere. In August, Gilead bought Corus Pharma in Seattle, primarily for its cystic fibrosis drug in the final stage of development, and also to get 90 scientists specializing in lung diseases.

Three months later, Gilead took over Myogen Inc., based in Westminster, Colo. It got two drugs in late-stage development and 160 new employees with expertise in cardiovascular disorders.

The number of qualified people looking for biotech jobs hasn't kept up with demand, according to the National Science Foundation. About 12 percent of U.S. college graduates in 2003 took science and engineering jobs, little changed from 11 percent a decade earlier, according to a December 2005 foundation study.

SlagMaster
04-02-2007, 06:26 AM
Why the hell would anyone want to be and Engineer or Scientist,
when you can go to Law School and be a parasitic Lawyer and
make ten times the money and never have to ever give a shit about
anything, with the the exception of, I need someone else next to
financially screw.

Kim Jong Tha Illest
04-02-2007, 06:41 AM
oddly enough, there are a few humans still out there who would rather do something useful than make a pile of money. Not many, but they are out there.

Kriger
04-02-2007, 09:20 AM
The cost of higher education is outrageous. Many of our more intelligent youth who are capable of comprehending the intricasies and complex realities of technology cannot afford the necessary schooling required to be skilled in these areas. And average intelligence is just not going to be interested.

I really do not understand why the emphasis is placed on corporate hiring from overseas when we have many qualified young people all ready here. They can easily canvass high schools throughout the nation for those of the required intellect and interest and subsidize their education in these areas.

It would also be good if they would forget all the irrelevant courses that comprise mainstream higher education and let the ones suitable for these areas of skilled work devote themselves to courses directly related to the field of their choice.

None of this will occur until education is re-established as a tool to learning instead of a profitable business.