PDA

View Full Version : Housing discrimination hits the Web


tricknologist
01-04-2006, 02:06 AM
Housing discrimination hits the Web (http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-12/113627076252410.xml)

Post-Katrina ads cited in federal complaints

Tuesday, January 03, 2006
By Gwen Filosa
Staff writer

The Web sites seem friendly enough.

With names such as Katrinahousing.org, they offer hurricane victims help finding places to live.


But the listings aren't for everyone. Many of the Good Samaritans who post available accommodations want to provide housing only for certain folks.

"Not racist, but white only," says a Jasper, Ala., posting that offers two rooms in a mobile home.

"As a white couple, we would be looking for a white mother and baby," advises a posting from Casselbery, Fla.

"Will help white males ages 20-45," says a Baton Rouge offer.

"We would prefer a white Christian couple. Pastors are welcome," says someone from Douglasville, Ga.

"Applicants must be gay, white or light-skinned Hispanic males," reads an offer from Sharon, Pa., which identifies the host as part of the gay community. An Ellicott City, Md., listing says in bold print, "Gays and lesbians not welcome."

A Minnesota woman who says she is white and 47 prefers to help "a single black male."

The Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center found 68 such postings on five Web sites that offer housing to people displaced by Katrina. All of them violate federal law because, even though most of the offers are for free housing, they are posted on Web sites that generate revenue through advertising, said the nonprofit civil rights organization, which filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Just as newspapers cannot publish housing ads that bar applicants because of their race, color, religion, sex, family status, disability and national origin, the Web also is subject to the 1968 Federal Fair Housing Act, the advocates say.

"I was shocked. We usually don't get that many straightforward cases," said James Perry, executive director of the fair housing center, which appears to have cleaned up the sites within a week of its Dec. 23 complaint to HUD.

One site, katrinahome.com, shut down after four months. Those who put up katrinahousing.org said they didn't know of the discriminatory ads but will screen them out.

"I've already got our tech team on it," said Paul Wilson, a marketing consultant in Provo, Utah, who is behind katrinahousing.org, a nonprofit with more than 180,000 offers of housing on the Internet.

The discriminatory postings make up only a part of what's on the site, said Wilson, who found the complaint a hassle but agreed to comply. Wilson said he can understand someone asking for a "Christian" roommate.

"If you're opening up your home free of charge, it's probably one of the most intimate things you can do," Wilson said. "This is adding to our plate. It's one more thing we have to do. We're all volunteers."

Some of the postings asked specifically for black residents, but the majority of the discriminatory postings say white people only. Several are apologetic in tone. "We live in a redneck county here and blacks are frowned on," says a Dunnellon, Fla., resident. "Heck, we were also frowned on . . . but I don't want any of my neighbors having ruffled feathers."

Others say they're looking out only for the evacuee's best interest. "I just want whoever needs this space to be comfortable and accepted," says one rural Southern Illinois volunteer, who adds in capital letters, "I am not racist."

Many posts say no children or limit their number, something Perry says also violates the fair housing law.

The Web site case is a rarity for Perry's group, which was a five-person office before Katrina and now is down to just Perry and attorney Lucia Blacksher.

Housing discrimination is the group's target, but the office has been swamped with phone calls about evictions and other issues entangled in the city's post-Katrina housing crunch.

"If it's a straightforward eviction, we can't help you," Perry recently said from his New Orleans office. "It has to be discrimination. It's not feasible for us to investigate every single case. We don't have enough resources to help every single person."

Instead, his team tries to take cases that represent broader issues of housing discrimination.

One such case, a lawsuit filed against the city of Denham Springs over a group home for mentally ill people that relocated there after losing its building in New Orleans, is poised for trial in federal court.

Options Foundation Inc., a Baton Rouge nonprofit, manages the group home that bought property in Denham Springs after being forced from New Orleans. Options is suing Denham Springs, which ordered the group home out of town, saying the region is zoned residential and therefore can't accommodate the 22 or so disabled residents.

The four-acre lot off Louisiana 1032 was zoned residential in 2002, but it was home to a halfway house for drug addicts until May 31, 2005, according to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Baton Rouge. The group home, where residents share household chores and eat dinner together as a family, isn't marked with signs and its neighbors include a nursing home, a thrift shop and trailer parks.

Options Foundation and Perry's group say the city is violating federal fair housing laws by trying to kick out the group home. The City Council denied an October request by Options to allow the home, citing zoning laws.

But Judge Ralph Tyson issued a restraining order, saying Options' case has merit.

Gwen Filosa can be reached at gfilosa@timespicayune.com or (504) 826-3304.

Felix the Cat
01-04-2006, 02:14 AM
I don't understand this, surely people are allowed to choose who they invite into their homes?

tricknologist
01-04-2006, 02:36 AM
I don't understand this, surely people are allowed to choose who they invite into their homes?

Not under the Fair Housing Act.

Starr
01-04-2006, 03:14 AM
So these people decide out of kindness(or at least how special it would make them feel to do a "good deed":p ) that they want to help people out when they do not have to do a thing and they get bitched at for their efforts. I wonder how many of these people will just say fuck it?

And no matter how much they don't want it to be so, many people are going to choose to help out and bring someone into their home who they feel they have more in common with. It is only common sense to do so, since it is going to lesson the possibility of conflicts.

I don't know what the hell that woman in Minnesota is thinking. She is not looking to help anyone out, just a nigger lover looking for "a man" it seems. It is pretty pathetic when you are so desperate you have to go about that in this way.:rolleyes:

raven
01-04-2006, 03:26 AM
A Minnesota woman who says she is white and 47 prefers to help "a single black male."
Yeah I agree with you Starr. This line right here is pretty disgusting. Watch her get raped... then again isn't that what these whores want? For these black men to "ravage" them as put by that bitch who wrote that nigger-loving article? :rolleyes: I have no faith in humanity.

Starr
01-04-2006, 03:32 AM
then again isn't that what these whores want?

yeah, you certainly can't rape the willing. She should have just said she is looking for a young, strong, agressive black buck who would like to provide her with sexual favors in exchange for room and board.:rolleyes:

infoterror
01-04-2006, 04:41 AM
Let's repeal the Fair Housing Act, using that idea: I want to be able to decide who lives on my property.

Felix the Cat
01-04-2006, 04:45 AM
Civil Rights Act of 1968 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1968)

The Civil Right Act of 1968 prohibited the following forms of discrimination:


Refusal to sell or rent a dwelling to any person because of his race, color, religion or national origin

Discrimination against a person in the terms, conditions or privilege of the sale or rental of a dwelling.

Advertising the sale or rental of a dwelling indicating preference of discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin.


I don't see how that relates to this:

All of them violate federal law because, even though most of the offers are for free housing, they are posted on Web sites that generate revenue through advertising

The offers don't constitute "sale or rental" since the money earned by the website is not going to the homeowners. Am I wrong?

Starr
01-04-2006, 04:52 AM
Refusal to sell or rent a dwelling to any person because of his race, color, religion or national origin

Discrimination against a person in the terms, conditions or privilege of the sale or rental of a dwelling.

And how are either of these two proven? Oh yeah, a precious minority can just cry and bitch enough about how "dat racist cracka refused to rent or sell to me because I be black"

infoterror
01-04-2006, 05:03 AM
And how are either of these two proven?

Well, if you advertise "for whites only" it's assumed one is excluding Negroes except Slavs.

That's sort of "dithcrimination," unfortunately.

Starr
01-04-2006, 05:08 AM
Well, if you advertise "for whites only" it's assumed one is excluding Negroes except Slavs.

That's sort of "dithcrimination," unfortunately.


You don't need to advertise for whites only, but you sure can select only whites to live in your house. How can "discrimination" be proven in this way?

Kodos
01-06-2006, 03:20 AM
Not under the Fair Housing Act.

Actually as it refers to race specifically there is an 1866 law that predates the fair housing act on this( and this is what people are sued under because the damages are unlimited) prior to 1968( there was some court case) it just wasn't enforced.

Lord_Lugdreg
01-06-2006, 09:09 AM
I applaud these European-Americans on their return to Racial Reality.

It is sad they will probably be crushed by ZOG though.