San Francisco’s schools resegregate after integration is no longer required

[Petr]

Note how frustrated this (Jewish?) bureaucrat Biegel is about this development - men's natural tendency to segregate is overrunning their dysgenic creation of the New Socialist Man!


http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2006/01/04/news/20060104_ne07_seg.txt


Report: Segregation increasing

By Bonnie Eslinger
Staff Writer
Published: Tuesday, January 3, 2006 11:13 PM PST


Although a federal court order to integrate San Francisco’s public schools ended this week, the number of schools with students of predominantly one race is on the rise, according to an independent evaluator’s report.

UCLA education professor Stuart Biegel, assigned to monitor desegregation efforts, said the data in his final report proves that unless race — or even a student’s geographical location — is reintroduced into the district’s student assignment system, San Francisco’s public schools will continue to resegregate.

In a November ruling that ended the court’s role in overseeing the 22-year-old desegregation effort, a federal judge said the original court order to diversify schools had been rendered ineffective in subsequent years due to a 1999 settlement that removed race from the equation when the district assigned students to schools. That settlement had been reached with parents of Chinese-American students who had filed a lawsuit charging that the district’s race-based caps lessened the chance that their children could attend the district’s well-regarded schools.

According to Biegel’s report, filed last week, more than one-quarter of the district’s schools, approximately 50, are severely resegregated at one or more grade levels — the worst it has been since the 1999 settlement.

In addition to diversifying schools, the federal order — called a consent decree — was also created to ensure the district worked to increase the academic achievement for the district’s minority students. While the San Francisco Unified School District has higher percentages of students succeeding on state standardized tests than other urban school districts in California, Biegel’s report noted that San Francisco’s African-American students score the lowest compared to their peers in other cities.

San Francisco’s school board has been consulting in closed session with district counsel in recent months to determine what, if anything, it will do to reverse these trends. While veteran board member Dan Kelly has authored a resolution that would bring race back into consideration when assigning students — which would likely face a legal challenge — the board is also waiting on recommendations by hired consultants before making any decisions on a new student-placement system.

Last year, in Louisville, Ky., a federal judge upheld the limited use of race in making student assignments to achieve racial integration in the public schools.

But lawyers for the plaintiffs in the 1999 lawsuit said the Kentucky ruling wouldn’t apply in California, since voters passed Proposition 209 in 1996, which eliminates the use of racial preferences for public education and other state agencies and programs.

Biegel said that as long as race was not the only factor used in assigning schools, he believed its use could survive a court challenge.



Petr

[Starr]

So when people are given more of a choice, they will always choose to be around their own kind. And all of the diversity loving propaganda bullshit does not, in reality work all that great. I am shocked.:p

School segregation is a positive thing for everyone concerned, even blacks. They can learn at their own level and since they are always bitching about all of the racism they face, from whitey, they wouldn't have to worry about that quite as much if they are around their own people.

UCLA education professor Stuart Biegel, assigned to monitor desegregation efforts, said the data in his final report proves that unless race — or even a student’s geographical location — is reintroduced into the district’s student assignment system, San Francisco’s public schools will continue to resegregate.

And we, of course can not allow that to happen. If I had to guess I would say he is most likely a Jew. I would like to hear the kike explain and try to convince us of just why self(chosen) segregation is a negative thing. He would not be able to do it, without the words racism and bigotry coming up. That is all they really have, our "guilt" So they have to milk that for all it is worth.:rolleyes:

[Blaphbee]

Related to the above:

Rules for Discussion about Nazis, sensu ADL:
1) All Nazis are retarded stupid, but also mastermind complex schemes to take over the world, and if we don't fight them, they will win.

2) Everything Nazis say is insane, but we have to protect people from hearing it, as they might think it is sane, and select it the same way they might vote for one of our candidates.

3) Nazis are socially retarded, they've failed in life, and they hate themselves, which is why they have picked an ideology which doesn't focus exclusively on the self like every other ideology now.

4) No one likes Nazis, everyone hates Nazis, everyone knows Nazis are bad, but in weak open-minded moments, people might start thinking like Nazis unless told explicitly and constantly not to.

5) Even though Nazis are weak, they're morons, they're socially defective, etc. they are a major threat today.

6) Democracy will defeat Nazism, because most people if told that Nazis are insane will vote against them, but we have to protect Democracy by fighting Nazis, otherwise people might pick the Nazis, and then become insane.

7) Jews are never to be criticized, or critiqued, because that makes you a Nazi and you will have to be stripped of your job, thrown in jail, or otherwise persecuted to avoid other people being influenced by Nazi thought and made insane. But we have Freedom.