Pro white, "aryan guard" clashes with anti white racism protesters

[Starr]

CALGARY - Protesters from both sides of a white supremacists rally were hauled away in handcuffs after tempers and profanity flared on the steps of Calgary city hall.

A group of 15 neo-Nazis, most wearing balaclavas and carrying black flags bearing a "white pride" Celtic symbol, clashed with a crowd of over 60 counter-protesters Sunday afternoon.

On the eve of a civic election, the white supremacist group handed out leaflets protesting Canadian legislation allowing women to vote wearing face-covering burkas.


A female member of Calgary's Aryan Guard watched the crowd of anti-racism protestors as they squared off on the steps of City Hall Sunday afternoon.
Colleen De Neve/Calgary Herald

It wrapped up three hours later with the outnumbered white supremacists asking for police help to escort them to taxis while about 30 counter-protesters trailed behind.

"We got two cabs to meet them on the west side of the Cecil Hotel," said duty inspector Guy Slater.

Emotions were running high during the demonstration as the groups shouted and called each other names.

Many counter-protesters were also wearing balaclavas and bandanas to hide their faces. Both sides waved placards and chanted.

Police stepped in after a faceoff between opposing protesters turned physical, when a teenager yanked the kerchief off a white supremacist. The man retaliated by throwing a water bottle at the teen's head.

Both were marched away by police to be charged with assault.

Sunday's demonstration is the third incident to surface recently in Calgary with members of a group calling itself the Aryan Guard.

In August, neo-Nazi posters were slipped into issues of a weekly newspaper. Other posters were found around town.

"Canadians don't stand for any kind of racist or fascist violence,(a rally is violence? And, it was their side who started the physical confrontation) said counter-protester Peggy Askin of the Calgary and District Labour Council.

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=06380f9c-c830-4b5e-810f-517c758a6e09&k=68506

[Niccolo and Donkey]

A pox on both their houses.

[raven]

Not allowing Canadian women to vote is only going to steer their country towards a Stephen Harper majority government. The Neo-Cons and the Liberals are the same shit. You'd have a hell of a better chance of pushing for immigration reform rather than pushing to end women's suffrage. These protester folk are only making it that much harder for discussion about immigration control being accepted in public political discourse in Canada. It's still a big taboo in Canada. The Canadian RCMP is like a Gestapo when it comes to this kind of thing. In the US you can at least talk about it and even get some acceptance in the mainstream, even if you get called a racist by leftists.

[Count Sudoku]

Not allowing Canadian women to vote is only going to steer their country towards a Stephen Harper majority government. The Neo-Cons and the Liberals are the same shit. You'd have a hell of a better chance of pushing for immigration reform rather than pushing to end women's suffrage. These protester folk are only making it that much harder for discussion about immigration control being accepted in public political discourse in Canada. It's still a big taboo in Canada. The Canadian RCMP is like a Gestapo when it comes to this kind of thing. In the US you can at least talk about it and even get some acceptance in the mainstream, even if you get called a racist by leftists.

The protest was about letting muzzie women vote with their faces covered, not about letting women vote.

"On the eve of a civic election, the white supremacist group handed out leaflets protesting Canadian legislation allowing women to vote wearing face-covering burkas."

[Starr]

The protest was about letting muzzie women vote with their faces covered, not about letting women vote.

"On the eve of a civic election, the white supremacist group handed out leaflets protesting Canadian legislation allowing women to vote wearing face-covering burkas."


Yes, there was a female member of the Aryan Guard among them.

[O'Zebedee]

That's Exterminance's group - he's an MSF All-Star.

[harjit]

That's Exterminance's group - he's an MSF All-Star.
'Xterm posts at MSF as Abaddon. He's a fairly good-natured WN.

I heard he was arrested again recently (before this pre-election rally).

[Vindex]

The problem in my view is that they are protesting the thing in the wrong way.

Why not protest the fact that multicultism is a globalist agenda to mix and destory the natural diverisity of all races and cultural groups into a mass of wage slaves on a capitalist neo-feudal plantation. And that it is the duty of all righteous people to oppose such a evil system.

Not "bitches be in burkas."

And add to that the current system of demofartacy is flawed and does not represent the will of the people but is used to enforce the will of a plutocratic ruling elite who is pushing this destructive world order.

As capitalism end goal is return to feudalism with the merchant caste with a merchant system ruling in the place of the priest and warrior castes. And communism is the same only they rule by pretending to be for the peasents all the while locking the chains and yokes about their necks and limbs.

[harjit]

As capitalism end goal is return to feudalism with the merchant caste with a merchant system ruling in the place of the priest and warrior castes. And communism is the same only they rule by pretending to be for the peasents all the while locking the chains and yokes about their necks and limbs.
Vindex I'm just curious, if a world modeled on your beliefs came to materialize, would you belong to either the priest or warrior castes?

[Larrikin]

Vindex I'm just curious, if a world modeled on your beliefs came to materialize, would you belong to either the priest or warrior castes?
Fighter-Mage at level 20.

[Jake Featherston]

Fighter-Mage at level 20.

I wanna be a Bard, 'cause Bards can fight like Fighters, have Thieving skills, and can cast Druidic spells! And you get a play a lute, bitches!

[Count Sudoku]

The problem in my view is that they are protesting the thing in the wrong way.

Why not protest the fact that multicultism is a globalist agenda to mix and destory the natural diverisity of all races and cultural groups into a mass of wage slaves on a capitalist neo-feudal plantation. And that it is the duty of all righteous people to oppose such a evil system.

Not "bitches be in burkas."

And add to that the current system of demofartacy is flawed and does not represent the will of the people but is used to enforce the will of a plutocratic ruling elite who is pushing this destructive world order.

As capitalism end goal is return to feudalism with the merchant caste with a merchant system ruling in the place of the priest and warrior castes. And communism is the same only they rule by pretending to be for the peasents all the while locking the chains and yokes about their necks and limbs.

I totally agree. I'm not worked up even about bitches in burkas, let alone how they dress when voting. They should protest against mass immigration and white genocide.

[Vindex]

Neither as in such a world the need for castes would cease to be. I would just be me. I would probably spend most of my time doing gardening and relaxing under a tree.

Vindex I'm just curious, if a world modeled on your beliefs came to materialize, would you belong to either the priest or warrior castes?

[Jake Featherston]

Neither as in such a world the need for castes would cease to be. I would just be me. I would probably spend most of my time doing gardening and relaxing under a tree.

Who'd be doing the work in this vaunted society?

[Larrikin]

Who'd be doing the work in this vaunted society?
The NPCs...

[Jimbo Gomez]

Probably the niggerslaves.

[Vindex]

What type of work needs to be done?

Who'd be doing the work in this vaunted society?

[La Cosa Blanca]

What type of work needs to be done?

Organizing, Farming, Transportation, Delivery, Construction, Enforcement of law and keeping order(For a while), Art, Carpentry, Weaving, Healing, etc...

Could go on with the works and trades even a utopic/post-satya society or world would need...

[Hakluyt]

I'm genuinely surprised they had as many as 15 with them.

[Commander]

I talk to those guys sometimes over @ SF. They are well intentioned, but this event, I fail to see the logic behind it, & what they hoped to accomplish? It could be an age thing, on my part?

Maybe they just wanted an event of some sort, for a chance to go at it with the local B'Nai Brith street urchins? (also known as anti-racists)

[Warka]

These "neo-Nazis" should be supportive of, rather than protesting, voting rights for burqa-clad women.

After all, they're definitely not going to be voting Zionist.

[Jake Featherston]

What type of work needs to be done?

Agriculture would be one example, unless you plan to feed yourself exclusively from your garden. And unless you intend to eschew refrigeration and other benefits of electricity, power generation will be required. Various things, really.

[Commander]

These "neo-Nazis" should be supportive of, rather than protesting, voting rights for burqa-clad women.

After all, they're definitely not going to be voting Zionist.

I made a post saying basically the same thing, over @ SF. There are some very remedial people there, it takes patience to deal with them.

There is also a large contingent of NWO-Zionist supporters/provocateurs who have been "working the crowd" for quite some time @ that site. It causes much confusion in young semi-educated people's minds.

[Starr]

Yes, guys, they will be more likely to not cast any kind of pro war or pro Israel vote, but they also are going to be more likely as minority women to support just about everything else that is harmful to white canadians. These kind of women, surely are not going to be opposed to candidates who want to open up the door and let in more third worlders, enact even tougher hate crime laws,etc.etc. They may be in agreement with you about foreign policy, but as far as domestic policy goes, their views are probably much more in line with that of our enemies. That is probably what the "aryan Guard" can see which is also true of some of those stormfront members you believe to be Zionist agents, commander.:p

It sounds as if they are also protesting what they might see as special treatment here. There isn't going to be anyone else going into a voting booth who is going to be allowed to have their face covered.

[Warka]

I made a post saying basically the same thing, over @ SF. There are some very remedial people there, it takes patience to deal with them.

There is also a large contingent of NWO-Zionist supporters/provocateurs who have been "working the crowd" for quite some time @ that site. It causes much confusion in young semi-educated people's minds.

You have much more patience than I, friend, to hang out over there.

[Francis]

These "neo-Nazis" should be supportive of, rather than protesting, voting rights for burqa-clad women.

Why?

On the whole they usually vote for pro-immigration, and pro anti-racism candidates, further increasing the chances of these "neo-Nazis" being thrown in jail.

Furthermore they tend to be far more involved in electoral fraud, and one of the methods they use to get away with such fraud is through the use of the burqa.

Therefore by protesting this they are protesting against voting fraud, immigration, and racism laws all in one neat little package.

Cut off the burqa, and you cut down on voting fraud, cut down on voting fraud, and you cut down on the votes going to the pro-immigration, and anti-racism brigade, and considering that that can be a lot of votes at an election (I have no clue how many, but I know in most western countries it runs into the thousands) it seems like a good goal to go for, especially when so many members of the public (including many who might other wise not be supportive) find the burqa offensive.

Seems to make sense to me as a strategy.

[Francis]

Yes, guys, they will be more likely to not cast any kind of pro war or pro Israel vote.

Considering that Canada opted out of the "Coalition of the willing" the war isn't the same issue there as it is in America, or England, therefore their priorities are immigration, and race, so their votes do end up on the Zionist table.

[Warka]

Why?

On the whole they usually vote for pro-immigration, and pro anti-racism candidates, further increasing the chances of these "neo-Nazis" being thrown in jail.

Furthermore they tend to be far more involved in electoral fraud, and one of the methods they use to get away with such fraud is through the use of the burqa.

Therefore by protesting this they are protesting against voting fraud, immigration, and racism laws all in one neat little package.

Cut off the burqa, and you cut down on voting fraud, cut down on voting fraud, and you cut down on the votes going to the pro-immigration, and anti-racism brigade, and considering that that can be a lot of votes at an election (I have no clue how many, but I know in most western countries it runs into the thousands) it seems like a good goal to go for, especially when so many members of the public (including many who might other wise not be supportive) find the burqa offensive.

Seems to make sense to me as a strategy.

Understand that you're addressing this to someone who views the whole thing- voting- as a big fraud.

As if there are really separate teams who oppose each other and have different views, with one or some preferable to others: http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=458105&postcount=2 :rolleyes:

[Francis]

Understand that you're addressing this to someone who views the whole thing- voting- as a big fraud.

Don't worry, I do too.

I'm just trying to explain their motives.

[Commander]

Considering that Canada opted out of the "Coalition of the willing" the war isn't the same issue there as it is in America, or England, therefore their priorities are immigration, and race, so their votes do end up on the Zionist table.

That was while that nasty old Frenchman was in charge, have you seen who is in charge now?

The race traitor, Jew worshiping, 100% servant of Israel (and only Israel) PM Harper, would have sent them to Iraq in a heartbeat.

[raven]

Stephen Harper is slime. For whatever reason SF Canada overwhelmingly voted Conservative but at this point the Harper government is probably even worse than the Liberal government. When both groups advocate increases in immigration but the Liberals want to pull out of Afghanistan while Harper would love nothing more than to join the Coalition of the Willing, the *gasp* Liberals are by default the lesser of the two evils. The Harper Conservatives are really economically right-of-center liberals that want to wage wars in the Middle-East and scream out loud "SUPPORT ISRAEL! THE AXIS OF LIBERTY!" God am I sick of those type of Neo-Con nutjobs at the Freedominion site. :D They mindlessly continue to vote Conservatives like drones because OMFG The Liberal Majorities!!! OH NOES!!! At this point, is there really any redeeming value in the Conservative Party? The Tory party of old is dead and real conservatives need to realize that.

[Starr]

Don't worry, I do too.

I'm just trying to explain their motives.


this is also just mostly a case of them trying to draw attention to certain things that many might already be somewhat disturbed by. Surely none of them think for a second that their tiny protest is going to result in these women actually not being allowed to vote. If they can recognize this then the reasons for their protest run a bit deeper than the concern over Muslim women voting.

[Francis]

That was while that nasty old Frenchman was in charge, have you seen who is in charge now?

I have

The race traitor, Jew worshiping, 100% servant of Israel (and only Israel) PM Harper, would have sent them to Iraq in a heartbeat.

Would have, if he could have, but he can't now, he missed the boat, so it's a moot point.

Actually I've always felt like Canada has often played the role of unacceptable opposition in North America, and I think the Zionists have always backed certain politicians on that basis.

America says "war!", Canada says "no war, more immigration!", or "no war, more 'civil rights'!"

Therefore the anti-war lobby goes to the pro-immigration/political correctness house.

I think we're seeing the old switcheroo again now, I think that whilst Canada is now in possession of a leader who would have joined the "coalition of the willing" we're about to see, in the next year, America elect a president who ain't interested in a "coalition of the willing".

It's the usual cycle.

Push to much on the foreign front and you lose the public, so you only push for a while, then switch to domestic reforms, then, when the public is getting sick of politically correct reforms, at home, you go get in another war...

All the time maintaining public opposition, that supports the other regime (be it domestic against foreign, or foreign against domestic) and providing an illusion of democracy.

"I'm against the war, but I don't have to harm my reputation by supporting White Nationalists, because that Democrat guy is against the war"

"I'm against immigration, and political correctness, but I don't have to harm my reputation supporting White Nationalists, because that Republican guy is against immigration"

And so it goes on, round and round it goes, where it stops, nobody knows...

[Jake Featherston]

we're about to see, in the next year, America elect a president who ain't interested in a "coalition of the willing".

Wow, you're quite the optimist!

[Francis]

Wow, you're quite the optimist!

or incredibly wise...

or simply forgot my medication today...

[Jake Featherston]

or incredibly wise...

or simply forgot my medication today...

With the exception of Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, or Mike Gravel, I'm not aware of any candidates who fit the description you gave. Hillarious Rotten Klinton, Barack Hussein Obama, and John "1-800-AMBULANCE" Edwards all said they couldn't promise they'd have U.S. troops out of Iraq by 1/20/13!

[Commander]

I think Hillary is going to win. I also think she is primarily interesting in destroying what is left of the U.S., & not really interested in Iraq.

I think she'll wind down Iraq, & get out eventually. Too much money is spent there. She needs that $$ to hire more government employees that are useless except for political purposes.

She'll likely go "beaner crazy" & start doing stuff for them, after she legalizes them all.

In essence, I agree with Francis' theory, I guess you could say.

[Warka]

I think Hillary is going to win. I also think she is primarily interesting in destroying what is left of the U.S., & not really interested in Iraq.

I think she'll wind down Iraq, & get out eventually. Too much money is spent there. She needs that $$ to hire more government employees that are useless except for political purposes.

She'll likely go "beaner crazy" & start doing stuff for them, after she legalizes them all.

In essence, I agree with Francis' theory, I guess you could say.

The Big Money military industrial complex and Wall Street (one and the same, really) are backing Clinton: http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=30642

[Commander]

Those people in your link just want to keep contracts going, the Iraq war isn't necessary for that.

The JTF guys are convinced Hillary is going to be a real dove.

this is the right one sorry...............

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfvtqLH4sHQ

jsullivan (http://www.youtube.com/user/jsullivan777)

[Count Sudoku]

Stephen Harper is slime. For whatever reason SF Canada overwhelmingly voted Conservative

There weren't any real alternatives.

but at this point the Harper government is probably even worse than the Liberal government.

It's like the Rats and the Republicans. The Republicans are supposedly the white party but they do a shit job for whites.

When both groups advocate increases in immigration but the Liberals

Generally speaking, the Liebranos are more in favor of increasing immigration. No party including the fucking Green party talks about cutting immigration in Canada.

want to pull out of Afghanistan while Harper would love nothing more than to join the Coalition of the Willing, the *gasp* Liberals are by default the lesser of the two evils.

No sane WN would ever consider voting liberal. Better to vote for no one.

Edit: Some people think it might be better to throw gasoline on the fire that is consuming the West rather than let it destroy us slowly. Sort of like voting for Hillary or the Obamination. Plus in the latter caset there is the angle that white men would be doubly pissed off if it was one of those two pulling the exact same shit as Jorge Bush has for the last 7 years.

The Harper Conservatives are really economically right-of-center liberals that want to wage wars in the Middle-East and scream out loud "SUPPORT ISRAEL! THE AXIS OF LIBERTY!"

True.

God am I sick of those type of Neo-Con nutjobs at the Freedominion site. :D They mindlessly continue to vote Conservatives like drones because OMFG The Liberal Majorities!!! OH NOES!!!

Free Dominion is considered a right wing extremist website by Canadian standards. There are plenty of Pro-Israel neo-cohen nutjobs on that site though. Basically like Free Republic.

At this point, is there really any redeeming value in the Conservative Party? The Tory party of old is dead and real conservatives need to realize that.

The only value is that it is sort of less unpleasant being anally raped by a good looking white guy than an ugly nigger.

[Jake Featherston]

The only value is that it is sort of less unpleasant being anally raped by a good looking white guy than an ugly nigger.

Yes. Yes, it is.

Welcome to the brotherhood.

[Count Sudoku]

Yes. Yes, it is.

Welcome to the brotherhood.

Where's my fucking rep? That line was worthy of Shakespeare. :)

[Francis]

In essence, I agree with Francis' theory, I guess you could say.

In that case vote for me in 2008!

Playfair in 2008! (http://www.myspace.com/playfair_2008)

and before anyone asks, or takes it the wrong way, it was a private 'joke', between about 4 or 5 friends.

Unfortunately a few sites found the page, didn't spot it was a joke, and published me as a potential candidate, at which point nearly 20,000 "supporters" turned up (which says a lot about the electorate out there...)

However, if you want, you can still write me in, several hundred, quite possibly certifiable, people are doing so.

It won't make any difference to your future, but think what it will do to my ego?

[Count Sudoku]

These "neo-Nazis" should be supportive of, rather than protesting, voting rights for burqa-clad women.

After all, they're definitely not going to be voting Zionist.

Actually, muzzies vote about 95% liberal. An amusing anecdote. A friend asked a muzzie man why he voted liberal. The muzzie responded, "I hate everything the liberal party stands for but they will let in more muzzies into the country than anyone else."

[Francis]

I think Hillary is going to win. I also think she is primarily interesting in destroying what is left of the U.S., & not really interested in Iraq.

I think she'll wind down Iraq, & get out eventually. Too much money is spent there. She needs that $$ to hire more government employees that are useless except for political purposes.

She'll likely go "beaner crazy" & start doing stuff for them, after she legalizes them all.

That's pretty much the angle I was coming from, I think the chances are high that the next president will look to wind down Iraq, either immediately, or as a slow wind down, over the next few years.

Iraq really isn't an issue anymore, the time of Iraq as an issue was from around 1999, thru to 2002, and yet a lot of people will be voting on it now, years after the event.

The electorate tends to be reactive, and slow to react at that, but then it's hardly surprising, when you think about it.

Something happens in the world, someone sees it, they think about it, it gets reported, we read/hear about it, we think about it, often discuss, or debate it, and then finally, after all that, we react.

The electorate is usually years behind on a lot of issues, arguing for, or against, issues that are on the wind down, rather than things that could become issues in the future.

They often react to what happened sometime in the past, rather than plan for what's going to happen in the future.

[Warka]

Actually, muzzies vote about 95% liberal. An amusing anecdote. A friend asked a muzzie man why he voted liberal. The muzzie responded, "I hate everything the liberal party stands for but they will let in more muzzies into the country than anyone else."

"Liberal", "conservative", it's all the same thing anymore in reality.

[Hakluyt]

Well, as it relates to Zionism (because that's all that matters in Canadian politics, right? :rolleyes:), the Liberals have moved away from their traditional Jewish constituency over the past 5 years and have begun aligning themselves more toward Islamic groups. During the 2006 Lebanon summer escapades, Liberal cabinet ministers & backbenchers were quite vocal against Israel and were not rebuked by their leadership - a first. The Conservatives, naturally, were silent or supportive of Israel. This could be explained by the fact that the Canada's Muslim population surpassed its Jewish population c. 2004. My guess would be this gambit will pay off for the Liberals in terms of total votes gained, because most Jews will probably just become apathetic rather than support the Conservatives. Jewish groups and elites have, however, slowly begun aligning themselves toward the Conservatives (see for example Heather Reisman and Garry Schwartz (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1678135/posts))