PDA

View Full Version : The bishops' revolt


Felix the Cat
01-13-2008, 08:57 AM
http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10499119

IT MUST have turned the bosses of Spain's main political parties green with envy. Less than three months before a general election, more than 150,000 people packed into Madrid for what may turn out to have been the biggest rally held during the campaign, in what looks like an increasingly close electoral race.

Those calling the people onto the streets on December 30th, billed as “Christian Family Day”, were not professional politicians, but Spain's Catholic bishops. The demonstration added up to an impressive display of strength. As the bishops were quick to point out, the church is Spain's biggest social movement. But they did not limit themselves to spiritual matters. Their words were full of raw politics, and their target was clear. The Socialist prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, they averred, was leading the country towards moral and democratic ruin.


“We are heading towards the end of democracy,” said one bishop. Spain was “going backwards” on human rights, claimed another. The family was under “serious attack”, said a third. Lay speakers piled on the anti-government rhetoric. “Don't leave the hearts and minds of your children in the hands of anyone, and especially not of the state,” said one. But the Socialists have hit back. Some bishops are “archaic andultra-conservative”, said the party's president, Manuel Chaves. Mr Zapatero said they were trying to sell a false apocalypse.

Conservative Catholics have disliked Mr Zapatero from the moment he won election on March 14th 2004, just three days after Islamist bombers killed 191 people on Madrid trains. The church has noisily opposed laws to make divorce easier, allow gay marriage and take religion out of the obligatory school curriculum. Not that there is there anything new about Spain's left clashing with the Catholic church. Their battles long predate the civil war of the 1930s, when radicals killed more than 6,000 priests, nuns and monks. The church hierarchy at the time backed the nationalist rebel general, Francisco Franco. Some bishops even publicly raised stiff arms in fascist salutes.

This historical confrontation was meant to have ended with the rediscovery of democracy in the 1970s. But church conservatives now seem inspired by America's powerful religious right and by Italy's Roman Catholic bishops, who have never been scared of politics. In Spain, where three-quarters of people define themselves as Roman Catholic but fewer than one-fifth regularly attend church, some bishops clearly believe it is time to convert faith into political clout.

Yet Christian Family Day may have done little to dent Mr Zapatero's chances of winning re-election on March 9th. Indeed, it could help them. Even observant Spaniards are relatively relaxed about their Catholicism. They are not as conservative as Poles or Italians. Some bishops were upset by the tone of the rally. Those willing to endure long coach trips to Madrid for the rally were never likely to vote Socialist. Their natural home is the opposition People's Party (PP), which trails the Socialists by 2.5-4.5 points in most polls.

The Socialists' main electoral problem is to get their supporters into the polling booths. One of the best ways to solve it is to scare them. That is what the 2004 train bombings, with their messy political aftermath and claims by the PP of involvement by the Basque terrorist group, ETA, did. Mr Zapatero won a surprise victory. Some Socialist strategists believe that the sight of a loud political church, bringing with it bad memories of Francoism, may have a similar effect. “They have lent us a hand,” claims one Socialist campaign organiser, Antonio Hernando.

The PP, tellingly, has not jumped on the church bandwagon this time. It prefers to focus on an increasingly fragile economy. Spain's bishops may have discovered their political muscle, but that does not mean they know how, or when, to use it.

Boleslaw
01-13-2008, 07:20 PM
Even observant Spaniards are relatively relaxed about their Catholicism. They are not as conservative as Poles or Italians.

Hilaire Belloc noted that the Spainish were really devout to begin with. They just touted Catholicism out of a simple hatred for anything foreign.

Petr
01-13-2008, 07:36 PM
Hilaire Belloc noted that the Spainish were really devout to begin with.
Do you mean "were not really devout"? Where did Belloc write that?

Anyways, here's a related thread:


Spain's split personality

"While it is true that more than a million Spaniards turned out to hear the Pope celebrate mass in Valencia, only 20 per cent of Spaniards attend church anymore. Zapatero himself, whose grandfather, a republican army officer, was shot dead during the civil war, declined to attend the Pope's mass."

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=14087&highlight=petrou


Petr

Boleslaw
01-13-2008, 08:43 PM
Do you mean "were not really devout"?

Yes, sorry, another one of my infamous typos.


Where did Belloc write that?

In Europe and the Faith (http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext05/rpnft10.txt):

"Prussia indeed, the protagonist, was atheist. But her subject provinces supported her exultantly, Catholic Cologne and the Rhine and tamely Catholic Bavaria. Her main support--without which she could not have challenged Europe--was that very power whose sole reason for being was Catholicism: the House of Hapsburg-Lorraine which, from Vienna, controlled and consolidated the Catholic against the Orthodox Slav: the House of Hapsburg-Lorraine was the champion of Catholic organization in Eastern Europe.

The Catholic Irish largely stood apart.

Spain, not devout at all, but hating things not Catholic because those things are foreign, was more than apart. Britain had long forgotten the unity of Europe. France, a protagonist, was notoriously divided within herself over the religious principle of that unity. No modern religious analysis such as men draw up who think of religion as Opinion will make anything of all this. Then why was there a fight? People who talk of "Democracy" as the issue of the Great War may be neglected: Democracy--one noble, ideal, but rare and perilous, form of human government--was not at stake. No historian can talk thus. The essentially aristocratic policy of England now turned to a plutocracy, the despotism of Russia and Prussia, the immense complex of all other great modern states gives such nonsense the lie...."

When I have time, I'll post his observations about Spain in general during his travels there. They're honestly quite hilarious, especially the part where he remarks how the nature of Spanish society is comparable to what you find among Negroes - of course that reference is edited out of most recent biographies of him(like Pearce's).

Boleslaw
01-13-2008, 09:05 PM
When I have time, I'll post his observations about Spain in general during his travels there. They're honestly quite hilarious, especially the part where he remarks how the nature of Spanish society is comparable to what you find among Negroes - of course that reference is edited out of most recent biographies of him(like Pearce's).

Here were are, the one regarding Spanish Catholicism in general, and how its relation to the Spanish character in general, written in 1905:

"The government and all public affairs of Spain are about what you might expect from negroes. They are really inexcusable for laziness and utter lack of discipline. It would astonish you to see this place. It is a pity Napoleon did not get there earlier and stay longer; he might have re-invigorated it as he did the valley of the Rhine...

...Catholicism (or mysticism in excess) has been made to blame for it and might have certainly have such effects, but as a fact it has nothing to do with it. The people are good deal less Catholic than France, but the Church has more power, or rather it less attacked politically, but the number of men who go to Mass is less than in France. I think a good deal more Catholicism would wake them up a little."
--cited in the Life of Hilaire Belloc pg.198

There's another one written in 1907, concerning his journey to Madrid. This makes me laugh out hard everytime I read it. :D:

"Yes, at last! Madrid! But at what a cost! All the way burning deserts from the Pyrenees onwards and my Christ! What cooking! Never again! Next time on a mule, or in a Litter, or even in a train. But never again on foot across those brown Sahara plains and those formless, treeless hills. I have added to my knowledge and I am a fuller man. I know now what is meant by 'Dura Iberiae Tellus' as slso by the 'Reconquista'. Great God what a march. I am off home. It is not to be endured.

I had meant to run to earth the great-granddaughter of Carmen in Seville, but it was not for me. The country has defeated Napoleon and sundry others. What an ugly country, a curious place, more like the moon than the earth...

...I have had enough of Spain. I have crossed the Pyrenees by a difficult col that makes me sick to think of even now, so steep it was and so precipitous for one on foot and all alone. I have marched to Huesca, to Saragossa, to the hills of Teruel, to the hills of Cuenca and here."
--cited in Life of Hilaire Belloc pg. 222-23

ROTFL!

Draugen
01-13-2008, 11:06 PM
Well, he should know better than to defy the sierras during the heat. Serves him well. :)

The topography of the Peninsula is very different from that of Continental Europe. Various mountain ranges separate it into two North and South blocks, also harsh and montainous in their own right.
The scarce latitudinal passages which unite the two regions actually formed the backbone of the main political powers from the Middle Ages onwards: Portugal, Leon, Castille and Aragon.