PDA

View Full Version : Majority of Britons reject the orthodox Darwinian evolution theory


Petr
01-29-2006, 02:08 PM
Rather surprising statistics indeed - perhaps Britons haven't been completely brainwashed yet...


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4648598.stm

http://creationsafaris.com/crev200601.htm#20060126a


Darwin Dissed in His Own Homeland

01/26/2006


One would think Brits would cherish their guru Darwin, but he didn’t come out all that well in a poll, reports BBC News. More than half the population doesn’t believe in the theory of evolution, results showed, and 39% said either creation or intelligent design best explains their view on the origin and development of life (about 12% didn’t know).

Lord Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society was stunned. “It is surprising that many should still be sceptical of Darwinian evolution,” he said. “Darwin proposed his theory nearly 150 years ago, and it is now supported by an immense weight of evidence.”

The editor of the BBC Horizon program that initiated the poll called this the first introduction to the British public’s views on this issue. He also was surprised; “Most people would have expected the public to go for evolution theory, but it seems there are lots of people who appear to believe in an alternative theory for life’s origins,” he commented. People over 55 were more likely to reject Darwinism.


For a country steeped in Darwinian dogma for over a century, with only a small minority attending church where religion is nearly moribund, this is quite a surprising statistic. If Darwin gave the world the best idea anyone ever had, and is the figurehead of modern biology, why is his claim not so obvious to all the people? Lord Martin Rees was glad there is no movement to oppose evolution like in the US, but then why can’t Darwin’s disciples win more converts when they have complete control of the science curricula and a near monopoly on the definition of science and truth? Can’t the people see the weight of evidence? Maybe they see through it.

raven
01-29-2006, 02:23 PM
I have studied a fair deal in intelligent design. There is no chance in hell the world is only 5,000-6,000 years old. I am surprised that 38% of Americans want intelligent design to replace evolution theory in schools and that so many Americans and Britons refuse to accept evolutionary theory. That said I have respect for intelligent design advocates because many of them are educated but how the hell can these people deny the plethora of evidence suggesting that the world was around for a hell of a lot longer and that evolution did occur.

Petr
01-29-2006, 02:27 PM
I have studied a fair deal in intelligent design.
If you had really done that, and if you knew what it is all about...


There is no chance in hell the world is only 5,000-6,000 years old.
... then you should know that this "young-earth hypothesis" is definitely a hard-core Creationist one, and not propounded by the Intelligent Design.


Petr

raven
01-29-2006, 03:15 PM
If you had really done that, and if you knew what it is all about...



... then you should know that this "young-earth hypothesis" is definitely a hard-core Creationist one, and not propounded by the Intelligent Design.


Petr
It's not exclusive to hard-core creationists. I have seen "creation science"/intelligent design advocates claim that there was a flood 5000-6000 years ago that was responsible for the origins of life.

Kodos
01-29-2006, 03:57 PM
It's not exclusive to hard-core creationists. I have seen "creation science"/intelligent design advocates

"Creation scientists"( hardcore creationists with new marketing) probably, IDers( who are generally more neo Lamarckian in view) generally not.

Only a very very very small minority of the population believes in the "young earth" theory.

Petr
01-29-2006, 04:23 PM
Only a very very very small minority of the population believes in the "young earth" theory.

"Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."

(Matthew 7:14)


Petr

Lenny
01-29-2006, 10:05 PM
39% said either creation or intelligent design best explains their view on the origin and development of life (about 12% didn’t know).It's safe to say that a great majority of those who believe in creation believe in evolution too, the two dont necessarily contradict each other. The number who believe in creation alone and totally reject evolution is no where near 39%

I have seen "creation science"/intelligent design advocates claim that there was a flood 5000-6000 years ago that was responsible for the origins of life.The Bible wasn't meant to be a science manual, especially considering that when Genesis was written people couldn't possibly even conceive of what we know to be factual science today. For example how would you possibly explain to someone living in 1500 BC what the internet is?