View Full Version : Mugabe Moves Against City Whites
Fade the Butcher
02-02-2006, 03:56 AM
Does anyone remember a few decades ago how anti-racists insisted that nigger democracy be substituted for white supremacy in Rhodesia?
Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/02/wzim02.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/02/ixworld.html)
President Robert Mugabe has begun confiscating and vandalising white-owned property in Zimbabwe's cities, after taking over most farms in the countryside.
His police last week evicted hundreds of people from their homes eight miles from the centre of Harare.
Ian Ross, 68, the owner of Gletwyn farm, incorporated into the capital in 1996, could hardly control himself as he recalled how police turfed his workers out into the rain.
"They arrived to evict the workers, which they did piece by piece, village by village compound by compound," said Mr Ross.
"The workers were dumped. They moved into sheds, into chicken runs. They were living like rabbits."
Mr Mugabe began violently evicting and dispossessing some 4,000 white farmers and hundreds of thousands of their workers in 2000. The whites were punished because the president said they supported and funded the opposition which almost beat him in the election that year. . . .
Yeah, Bob Marley performed this song in Zimbabwe in April 1980, to celebrate the transition to Black rule:
Bob Marley - Zimbabwe Lyrics
Every man gotta right to decide his own destiny,
And in this judgement there is no partiality.
So arm in arms, with arms, we'll fight this little struggle,
'cause that's the only way we can overcome our little trouble.
Brother, you're right, you're right,
You're right, you're right, you're so right!
We gon' fight (we gon' fight), we'll have to fight (we gon' fight),
We gonna fight (we gon' fight), fight for our rights!
Natty dread it in-a (zimbabwe);
Set it up in (zimbabwe);
Mash it up-a in-a zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Africans a-liberate (zimbabwe), yeah.
No more internal power struggle;
We come together to overcome the little trouble.
Soon we'll find out who is the real revolutionary,
'cause I don't want my people to be contrary.
And, brother, you're right, you're right,
You're right, you're right, you're so right!
We'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight), we gonna fight (we gon' fight)
We'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight), fighting for our rights!
Mash it up in-a (zimbabwe);
Natty trash it in-a (zimbabwe);
Africans a-liberate zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
I'n'i a-liberate zimbabwe.
(brother, you're right,) you're right,
You're right, you're right, you're so right!
We gon' fight (we gon' fight), we'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight),
We gonna fight (we gon' fight), fighting for our rights!
To divide and rule could only tear us apart;
In everyman chest, mm - there beats a heart.
So soon we'll find out who is the real revolutionaries;
And I don't want my people to be tricked by mercenaries.
Brother, you're right, you're right,
You're right, you're right, you're so right!
We'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight), we gonna fight (we gon' fight),
We'll 'ave to fight (we gon' fight), fighting for our rights!
Natty trash it in-a zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Mash it up in-a zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Set it up in-a zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Africans a-liberate zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Africans a-liberate zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Natty dub it in-a zimbabwe (zimbabwe).
Set it up in-a zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Africans a-liberate zimbabwe (zimbabwe);
Every man got a right to decide his own destiny.
Anarch
02-02-2006, 10:49 AM
I think now would be a good time for Rhodesia to be declared a failed state, and militarily occupied by Western troops.
Ahknaton
02-02-2006, 11:23 AM
I think now would be a good time for Rhodesia to be declared a failed state, and militarily occupied by Western troops.
How about declaring Africa a failed continent?
Jimbo Gomez
02-02-2006, 01:08 PM
I think now would be a good time for Rhodesia to be declared a failed state, and militarily occupied by Western troops.
Yeah, and let's send our wogs back and abolish our failed democracies too while we're at it.
Not gonna happen. :(
tricknologist
02-03-2006, 02:27 AM
I think now would be a good time for Rhodesia to be declared a failed state, and militarily occupied by Western troops.
False !
Let nature take its course.
infoterror
02-03-2006, 02:37 AM
I think now would be a good time for Rhodesia to be declared a failed state, and militarily occupied by Western troops.
...or maybe just abandoned. We chould ship our unwanted Africans there as well.
Fade the Butcher
02-03-2006, 02:55 AM
Why is Rhodesia a failed state? What led to its failure?
OVERWATCH
02-03-2006, 03:10 AM
Why is Rhodesia a failed state? What led to its failure?
Rhodesia doesn't exist. The ancient, glorious his-story of Zimbabwe, has been now resurrected to continue more than just the two hundred year flash in the pan "civilisation" that once existed there before. Into the morass it fell then, and out of the morass it rises now... behold! so great is it's glory, that any offers of assistance to that great cuntry should be forgotten, as they might be taken for..... condescension.
Let's not upset this ancient and great cultcha with insinuations of inferiority.
Anarch
02-03-2006, 03:19 AM
How about declaring Africa a failed continent?
Because it'd take quite some time to sterilise a population on such a large scale.
False !
Let nature take its course.
My uncle was born in Rhodesia. I'll settle for a temporary occupation with the objective of evacuating white Rhodesians to a more hospitable country. Say, Australia. I say we declare South Africa a failed state while we're at it. If any questions are asked, stirring up a civil war shouldn't be too hard.
OVERWATCH
02-03-2006, 03:26 AM
Because it'd take quite some time to sterilise a population on such a large scale.
My uncle was born in Rhodesia. I'll settle for a temporary occupation with the objective of evacuating white Rhodesians to a more hospitable country. Say, Australia. I say we declare South Africa a failed state while we're at it. If any questions are asked, stirring up a civil war shouldn't be too hard.
They should just be given a free pass out of the cuntry and be able to emigrate to the west, where they could serve as the new Cheap Working Immigrant mkV .
Occupying the cuntry would not be cost-effective, because each worker would co$t more than readily available third whirrld immigrants.
Just let those good negroids of Zimbabwe have their fun, we can even videotape it via Global Hawk and broacast on prime-time.
infoterror
02-03-2006, 03:28 AM
I think it's time for the white man to leave Africa. Conversely...
Felix the Cat
02-03-2006, 04:47 AM
My uncle was born in Rhodesia. I'll settle for a temporary occupation with the objective of evacuating white Rhodesians to a more hospitable country. Say, Australia. I say we declare South Africa a failed state while we're at it. If any questions are asked, stirring up a civil war shouldn't be too hard.
Wasn't there a ruckus in Australia a few years back over the immigration of "racist" South Africans?
Starr
02-03-2006, 05:26 AM
Another story of a glorious free African nation that i am sure will be all over the news. lol.
I was just flipping through the channels and saw Oprah on some show whining about starving and AIDS-ridden African children and how if we all were to do our part, Which we are failing to do, the face of Africa(as she put it) could be changed very soon. And of course, the fools in the audience were all clapping for her and her "wise words":rolleyes: Now I know most people will see her and her words will go in one ear and out the other, but I can't help but think about the morons(usually always whites) that will be "moved" by such crap and feel they must do something. The same type of people who do not know or worse would not or do not care how whites are being treated by these savages(after all, they are just striking back because of all the years of "oppression" as someone like Humanist might say)
I would agree that whites just need to get out and let them destroy themselves.
Ambrosio Spinola
02-03-2006, 06:03 AM
I would agree that whites just need to get out and let them destroy themselves.
For which we would get blamed too.
Billy Score
02-03-2006, 05:20 PM
I support Mugabe's actions on the grounds of black nationalism. It is his country, not white man's country. Infact, if white leaders were more like Mugabe towards their own troublesome minorities, the world would be a far better place.
One cannot possibly be against mugabe while at the same time against blacks/arabs in europe or the US, since Europeans have no claim to Africa and nothing in common with the people there. It is neither our job nor our right to interfere with african affairs. if they want to nuke the shit out of each other, good for them. it only becomes a european issue when the africans decide to export their problems. At that point, we drop the ball and give them a nuclear rimjob.
Jimbo Gomez
02-03-2006, 05:23 PM
I give them a rimjob.
Funny what you find in mazdak's statements if you leave out some random words.
Starr
02-03-2006, 05:52 PM
One cannot possibly be against mugabe while at the same time against blacks/arabs in europe or the US, since Europeans have no claim to Africa and nothing in common with the people there. It is neither our job nor our right to interfere with african affairs.
I would agree. But they also need to quit putting their hand out to whitey and the west and begging for everyone to take care of them making it appear as though they are incapable of doing much of anything on their own.
raven
02-03-2006, 06:14 PM
If you want my opinion I believe that it is in the best interests for the Euros in Africa (the now named Zimbabwe, South Africa, etc.) to re-settle in Europe, the United States or in the British Commonwealth. Personally I was always opposed to whites being in then-called Rhodesia and South Africa to be honest. These are african nations and should be for africans just as european nations should be for Europeans. Get what I mean? That also means I don't like the many Africans in Europe, US and the Commonwealth either.
OVERWATCH
02-03-2006, 06:29 PM
Infact, if white leaders were more like Mugabe towards their own troublesome minorities, the world would be a far better place.
The difference is, Zimbabwe's whites were vital to the economy. Not "vital" in some token way like inventing some obscure gas mask, traffic light, or producing some music of dubious value; but they provided ~90% of agricultural output as well as most technical jobs. Mugabe is an idiot, he's liquidated and dispossessed the very best of his c[o]untry, in order to appease the masses of his ignorant black c[o]untrymen/hottentot savages, and as such the whole of it has descended into being one of the most bass-ackward, turd whirrld areas known to man.
Blacks in the western world, in contrast, are a troublesome minority which takes far more than they give. The other minorities, who are actually net productive segments to society, are far more assimilable and worthy of keeping.
cerberus
02-03-2006, 07:31 PM
Mugabe is an animal , period.
He does not care anything for his own people , in a land which had been made a beggar , he and his henchmen are the only ones wearing suits.
Felix the Cat
02-03-2006, 07:47 PM
As in South Africa, the biggest victims of the disorder in Rhodesia are other black Africans (particlarly the Matabele, many of whom would like to see White rule restored)
This is not a simple black/white issue
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.