@ diabloblanco

[annoying bitch]

If you consider even "white Hamitic" (Egyptians? Ethiopians? LOL) ancestry to be part of the same spectrum as Indo-European, why aren't Ashkenazi Jews part of the Pan-Aryan rainbow? Yiddish, like Farsi, is an Indo-European language written in a Semitic alphabet. Culturally the Ashkenazim are Central and Eastern European. They have no "Khazar" cultural practices, and even if they did, the Khazars were Bulgar Turks mixed with Finnic/Ugric who converted to Judaism. If modern day Jewish descendants of Khazars are "non-Aryan" by account of their blood, so would Bulgarian people be. If the issue is not Khazar blood but the Jewish religion: Why is the conversion of 'Aryan' Bulgar Turks to Semitic Judaism considered some act of 'race treason' while conversion of Aryan Persians to Semitic Islam is not?

[shanemac]

This guy is white in Diabloblanco's universe...

http://madnews.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/nasnigger1.jpg

[dimitrije]

I have visited his shit hole called panf few days ago, they are having discussion on white Indinas over there.

[Ambrosio Spinola]

Please keep it highbrow

[diabloblanco]

If you consider even "white Hamitic" (Egyptians? Ethiopians? LOL) ancestry to be part of the same spectrum as Indo-European, why aren't Ashkenazi Jews part of the Pan-Aryan rainbow? Yiddish, like Farsi, is an Indo-European language written in a Semitic alphabet. Culturally the Ashkenazim are Central and Eastern European. They have no "Khazar" cultural practices, and even if they did, the Khazars were Bulgar Turks mixed with Finnic/Ugric who converted to Judaism. If modern day Jewish descendants of Khazars are "non-Aryan" by account of their blood, so would Bulgarian people be. If the issue is not Khazar blood but the Jewish religion: Why is the conversion of 'Aryan' Bulgar Turks to Semitic Judaism considered some act of 'race treason' while conversion of Aryan Persians to Semitic Islam is not?


Stop your usual "big lie" technique......the White Hamatic reference was to Amazigh, not Egyptians and surely not Ethopians. Admittedly it fits even White Berbers loosely at best as they have other influences such as Indo-European and are arguably Cro-Magnon survivors, but I included it just to be as precise as possible

why aren't Ashkenazi Jews part of the Pan-Aryan rainbow? Yiddish, like Farsi, is an Indo-European language written in a Semitic alphabet. Culturally the Ashkenazim are Central and Eastern European. They have no "Khazar" cultural practices, and even if they did, the Khazars were Bulgar Turks mixed with Finnic/Ugric who converted to Judaism. If modern day Jewish descendants of Khazars are "non-Aryan" by account of their blood, so would Bulgarian people be. If the issue is not Khazar blood but the Jewish religion: Why is the conversion of 'Aryan' Bulgar Turks to Semitic Judaism considered some act of 'race treason' while conversion of Aryan Persians to Semitic Islam is not?[/QUOTE]

You are either a Nordicist troll trying to back us into having the "Jewlover" albatross hung around our necks or just an anti that is trying to create trouble and drama, In either case we are not taking the bait
There is no concensus among PAS on the NS thing. Some hate it some love it, others just think its a largely irrelevant historical fascination. On the whole on Non-racial issues we are more likely to be conservative liberatrian or even National Anarchist, but we have trad conservative .NS even Third Position. Whiat we agree on though is race first

[diabloblanco]

This guy is white in Diabloblanco's universe...

http://madnews.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/nasnigger1.jpg
Another Big Lie, repeated over and over, half the times by antis that are not even WNs. None of you have the cujones to come and debate us though

[Ahknaton]

You are either a Nordicist troll trying to back us into having the "Jewlover" albatross hung around our necks
This really illustrates how insulated racialists are from mainstream thought. Being a "Jewlover" (i.e. not an anti-Semite) is only an albatross amongst a small % of the population.

[diabloblanco]

This really illustrates how insulated racialists are from mainstream thought. Being a "Jewlover" (i.e. not an anti-Semite) is only an albatross amongst a small % of the population.


Its one thing to be insulated from BELIEF in mainstream thought. Its another to be insulated from its reality and how it will effect your ability to "sell" your ideaology to your target audience. Its another still yet to lack an understanding of everyday social skills and human ionteraction
That is one reason why racialist ideaologies are so marginalized. They spend much of their time trying to convince a large number of the small number of people who agree with them why they should not because they have the "wrong" religiion, langiage, subrace, nationality culture etc
Yet at the same time they claim to hold racial determinism central That is fundamentally incoherent and irrational. The fact that I am a WN does not blind me to these realities

[shanemac]

Stop your usual "big lie" technique......the White Hamatic reference was to Amazigh, not Egyptians and surely not Ethopians. Admittedly it fits even White Berbers loosely at best as they have other influences such as Indo-European and are arguably Cro-Magnon survivors, but I included it just to be as precise as possible

why aren't Ashkenazi Jews part of the Pan-Aryan rainbow? Yiddish, like Farsi, is an Indo-European language written in a Semitic alphabet. Culturally the Ashkenazim are Central and Eastern European. They have no "Khazar" cultural practices, and even if they did, the Khazars were Bulgar Turks mixed with Finnic/Ugric who converted to Judaism. If modern day Jewish descendants of Khazars are "non-Aryan" by account of their blood, so would Bulgarian people be. If the issue is not Khazar blood but the Jewish religion: Why is the conversion of 'Aryan' Bulgar Turks to Semitic Judaism considered some act of 'race treason' while conversion of Aryan Persians to Semitic Islam is not?

You are either a Nordicist troll trying to back us into having the "Jewlover" albatross hung around our necks or just an anti that is trying to create trouble and drama, In either case we are not taking the bait
There is no concensus among PAS on the NS thing. Some hate it some love it, others just think its a largely irrelevant historical fascination. On the whole on Non-racial issues we are more likely to be conservative liberatrian or even National Anarchist, but we have trad conservative .NS even Third Position. Whiat we agree on though is race first

You're even claiming juden-vermin as white now? LOL

The truth is you're probably somewhat correct with all this pan-Aryan stuff, but it's just too much fun to make fun of you, and that's why people do it.

You take it way too far though. I will never accept any Iranians or Afghans as white. Even if they have a lot of white genes, their culture has been subsumed in the evil culture of Islam and they will never fit into white society.

[Ahknaton]

Its one thing to be insulated from BELIEF in mainstream thought. Its another to be insulated from its reality and how it will effect your ability to "sell" your ideaology to your target audience. Its another still yet to lack an understanding of everyday social skills and human ionteraction
That is one reason why racialist ideaologies are so marginalized. They spend much of their time trying to convince a large number of the small number of people who agree with them why they should not because they have the "wrong" religiion, langiage, subrace, nationality culture etc
Yet at the same time they claim to hold racial determinism central That is fundamentally incoherent and irrational. The fact that I am a WN does not blind me to these realities
Very good. Now take these points and apply them to your previous comment. How is being cast as a "Jew-lover" going to alienate you from the mainstream?

[ironweed]

You are either a Nordicist troll trying to back us into having the "Jewlover" albatross hung around our necks or just an anti that is trying to create trouble and drama, In either case we are not taking the bait
There is no concensus among PAS on the NS thing.

Who exactly is the "we" here?

[Vasily Zaitsev]

You are either a Nordicist troll trying to back us into having the "Jewlover" albatross hung around our necks or just an anti that is trying to create trouble and drama, In either case we are not taking the bait
There is no concensus among PAS on the NS thing. Some hate it some love it, others just think its a largely irrelevant historical fascination. On the whole on Non-racial issues we are more likely to be conservative liberatrian or even National Anarchist, but we have trad conservative .NS even Third Position. Whiat we agree on though is race first

You didn't answer her question. Why don't adherents of pan-Aryanism consider Ashkenazic Jews Aryan?

[ironweed]

You didn't answer her question. Why don't adherents of pan-Aryanism consider Ashkenazic Jews Aryan?

Yeah, I was kind of wondering that, too. Never mind including Berbers and then tossing Ashkenazic Jews out. Seems like a rather strange set of boundaries to draw, personally.

[harjit]

If modern day Jewish descendants of Khazars are "non-Aryan" by account of their blood, so would Bulgarian people be.
I didn't know this.

It can serve as a good rebuttal to the regular (i.e. non-pan-Aryan) WNs who assert that whiteness corresponds one-to-one with European ancestry, and that Jews are not white.

(I'm talking purely of race, not cultural or religious factors).

[raskalnikov]

Another Big Lie, repeated over and over, half the times by antis that are not even WNs. None of you have the cujones to come and debate us though
It doesn't take cujones to ban anyone you disagree with does it,Diablo?