PDA

View Full Version : Fukayama: After Neoconservatism


Fade the Butcher
02-19-2006, 10:47 AM
The rats are jumping ship. Enjoy. Oh shit. Buchanan was right after all.

NY Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/19/magazine/neo.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1140341918-QAd6dViPFvSbarY6mpZw8g&oref=slogin)

As we approach the third anniversary of the onset of the Iraq war, it seems very unlikely that history will judge either the intervention itself or the ideas animating it kindly. By invading Iraq, the Bush administration created a self-fulfilling prophecy: Iraq has now replaced Afghanistan as a magnet, a training ground and an operational base for jihadist terrorists, with plenty of American targets to shoot at. The United States still has a chance of creating a Shiite-dominated democratic Iraq, but the new government will be very weak for years to come; the resulting power vacuum will invite outside influence from all of Iraq's neighbors, including Iran. There are clear benefits to the Iraqi people from the removal of Saddam Hussein's dictatorship, and perhaps some positive spillover effects in Lebanon and Syria. But it is very hard to see how these developments in themselves justify the blood and treasure that the United States has spent on the project to this point. . .

Ahknaton
02-19-2006, 10:50 AM
Did he ever publically retract his "end of history" nonsense? He still seems to believe in it, because he's waffling on in that article about how his end-of-history thesis has been "misinterpreted".

Donny the Punk
02-19-2006, 11:00 AM
Did he ever publically retract his "end of history" nonsense? He still seems to believe in it, because he's waffling on in that article about how his end-of-history thesis has been "misinterpreted".
My thoughts exactly.

Fade the Butcher
02-19-2006, 11:27 AM
Fukayama goes on and on in the above article asking why and how the neoconservatives could have been misled into the notion that it was a great idea to attack Iraq to bring democracy to that country and to save the world from Saddam's nonexistent WMDs. His conclusion: this has been a great tragedy and neoconservatism has been permanently discredited by it so the neocons need to reinvent themselves under a new label. The essay published in the NYT was apparently taken from a new book he is about to publish. I wonder if Fukayama will mention in the book, as was pointed out by one poster over at KosherRepublic, that he was a big cheerleader for overthrowing Saddam himself and even went so far as to sign a letter addressed to Clinton advocating regime change in Iraq.