PDA

View Full Version : Spring Bear Hunt


sugartits
03-04-2006, 07:57 PM
Manitoba's Spring Bear Hunt and the Orphaning of Cubs:
There is a growing concern about the ethics of the Manitoba spring bear hunt because of the accidental killings of mother and bears and the orphaning of their cubs.

Bears are the only big game species that can be hunted in the spring (It is illegal to shoot moose or deer in the spring). Therefore, we must offer the same protection for bears that we provide for all other big game species.

Cubs orphaned in the spring have no chance of surviving in the wild on their own as they are still nursing and have not learned how to forage on their own yet. When a mother is killed, her cubs begin a slow and certain death. At first, they wait quietly for her in the safety of a tree. Then, as the pain of hunger grows in their bellies, they begin to squall for her. Eventually they are killed by a predator or die slowly of starvation - taking from 11 to 30 days. It is estimated that 100 to 150 cubs were orphaned and died in Manitoba's 1998 spring bear hunt.

About 30 percent of the bears killed in the spring hunt are females. In addition, about one third of those females have dependent cubs. There is not evidence that hunters kill nursing mothers intentionally. However, it is nearly impossible for most to tell a male from a female in spring, and mistakes are inevitable. The bear's fur is very long in spring when they have just come out of hibernation so it is very difficult to see nipples. Most bears are hunted at a bait site where the hunter is stationed in a stand up above the bait so they are looking down at the bear. This increases the difficulty of distinguishing nipples, as they cannot get a view of the bear's belly. Many mothers with cubs born that year do not bring them to the bait site as they can smell the presence of other bears and want to protect their cubs from predating male bears. Therefore, they leave them some distance away where the hunter would not be able to see them. Bears come to bait most frequently at dusk, which decreases the visibility.

Manitoba laws prohibit the killing of mother bears with cubs but they are simply not enforced. There has never been a single charge laid for killing a mother bear, much less a conviction. The law clearly does not protect cubs from being orphaned and therefore the law is meaningless. It is clear that there is either no will to enforce this law or it is too difficult to obtain a conviction.

Non-resident hunters - primarily Americans, kill the majority of the bears. A regulation for non-resident hunters for tracking the demographics of bears killed during the spring hunt required them to submit the reproductive tract and a tooth from each bear killed. However, there was only about 60% compliance with that regulation and no consequences for hunter who did not comply. Since then the regulation was replaced with a non-specific regulation stating that a person shall without delay surrender a wild animal or part of a wild animal or provide information pertaining thereto when requested by an officer, biologist, resource tech., etc. That was then replaced by a regulation, which continues to only require hunters and lodge operators to provide information, which can include the sex of the animal. This regulation makes it difficult to obtain accurate statistics on orphaned cubs.

In the U.S., all but six states have banned spring bear hunting. Recently Ontario did the same. Now it's time for Manitoba and the rest of Canada to follow suit.

We have a responsibility to ensure that we protect bears from pain and suffering.

WHAT CAN YOU DO? [WRITE TO YOUR PREMIER. This is not just a MB issue]

Write or email Premier Doer (PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca) and the Honourable Oscar Lathlin (MINCON@leg.mb.ca ), the Minister of Conservation at the Legislative Building, 450 Broadway Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0V8 asking them to ban the spring bear hunt in Manitoba.


http://www.winnipeghumanesociety.ca/animal_Issues_And_News/spring_Bear_Hunt.php

sugartits
03-04-2006, 07:59 PM
CALGARY -- Environmentalists have scored a major victory in Alberta, where the government announced a three-year moratorium yesterday on the province's controversial grizzly bear hunt.

"This is an emotional issue and I've heard from my colleagues in neighbouring jurisdictions that there are always strongly held views on all sides of this issue," Sustainable Resource Development Minister Dave Coutts said.

"Years ago, there was a fall hunt and that was suspended in favour of a spring hunt, and now we're suspending that for the next three years until we get more DNA evidence as to the number of grizzly bears that there are provincewide."

The announcement stunned those who have for years been fighting the hunt.

"I don't know what to do. I'm not used to good news," said Nigel Douglas, a conservation specialist with the Alberta Wilderness Association.

Scientists will take the next three years to try to get a handle on the grizzly bear population, which has been the subject of much debate among conservationists, hunters and the province.

Historical estimates place the population at between 6,000 and 9,000. Recent estimates vary widely.

Some figure that fewer than 1,000 bears are on provincial land and maybe a few hundred are in national parks.

One provincial government committee pegged the number of grizzles at about 700.

But Mr. Coutts threw all projections out the window yesterday, and said it will be up to researchers to conduct a more thorough count, to help guide the government about whether the hunt should be renewed or if grizzlies should be listed as a threatened species.

Jim Pissot, executive director of Defenders of Wildlife Canada, has flooded the government and reporters with letters in the past few weeks urging a halt to the hunt.

Mounting evidence that the bear population is in decline and an outcry from Albertans have finally pushed the government to act, he said. "I'm very impressed with how the minister has integrated those, taken them to heart and made what we think is the absolutely right decision," he said from Banff, where he was attending a grizzly bear management seminar.

In a province where conservationists are only half joking when they refer to environmental issues as part of the government's Industry portfolio, the decision to halt the hunt isn't enough alone to protect grizzlies, but it does represent a seismic shift in culture.

"This is the first tiny little baby step," Mr. Douglas said, "but it's a sign that we are now finally willing to start looking at measures that we need to adopt to restore grizzly bears. That in itself is a sign that there's finally some will to do something about it."

Mr. Pissot said the first call he made yesterday after hearing the news was to the minister's office to offer congratulations.

Over the years, the province has cut the number of hunting tags available (last year it was 73), closed the hunt in certain areas, reduced the number of female bears permitted as part of the hunt and increased poaching fines.

Mr. Pissot said more funding is needed for more conservation officers to help deter poachers.

"I've had one CO tell me that he doesn't even want me to talk about how thin they're staffed because that only increases poaching."

Martin Sharren, executive vice-president of the Alberta Fish & Game Association, said the province bent to political pressure despite an absence of evidence that the hunt is actually hurting the bear population.

"We're kind of painted as the bad hunter guys who just want to kill things," he said.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060304.GRIZZLY04/TPStory/National