Königin Luise von Preußen
08-02-2009, 11:40 AM
there is a proposal now for a formal debate, because it might be interesting and informative..
1) The topic of the debate:
"North Germans" and "The Celts"
2) The participants of the debate, and what positions they will argue:
Aryan Imperium and Kriger, AI is reborn in Aryanism, Kriger represents the Old Norse traditions.
3) The scope of the debate:
Philology, etymology (historical linguistic: scripture, language), definitions of culture and its background, historical regionalism
4) The length of the debate, in number of rounds:
minimum 5 and at maximum 10 to make it more interesting
5) Whether statements will be made concurrently or in turns, and if the latter, who goes first:
the 3.rd formal participant should be a moderator, who has also knowledge about the subjects matter and scope. would be nice.
6) The maximum length of each statement:
?
7) The time limit between statements:
?
8) The extent to which quotes and references from outside sources will be allowed:
as extensive as possible, of course representative ones
9) The starting date of the debate:
as soon as Kriger agrees to and a moderator is ready.
10) Any additional rules or a debate format that debate participants must observe:
I suggest to don't call each other insulting names in a sarcastic or meant manner. other suggestions are needed from both participants.
This is just a suggestion and based on this post (http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=740496&postcount=78). I ask Kriger and Aryan Imperium to round this suggested form up, i.e. to decide about and to say whether you are agreeing with the topic description or at least with the point 3 - the scope of the debate, I suggested, please!
1) The topic of the debate:
"North Germans" and "The Celts"
2) The participants of the debate, and what positions they will argue:
Aryan Imperium and Kriger, AI is reborn in Aryanism, Kriger represents the Old Norse traditions.
3) The scope of the debate:
Philology, etymology (historical linguistic: scripture, language), definitions of culture and its background, historical regionalism
4) The length of the debate, in number of rounds:
minimum 5 and at maximum 10 to make it more interesting
5) Whether statements will be made concurrently or in turns, and if the latter, who goes first:
the 3.rd formal participant should be a moderator, who has also knowledge about the subjects matter and scope. would be nice.
6) The maximum length of each statement:
?
7) The time limit between statements:
?
8) The extent to which quotes and references from outside sources will be allowed:
as extensive as possible, of course representative ones
9) The starting date of the debate:
as soon as Kriger agrees to and a moderator is ready.
10) Any additional rules or a debate format that debate participants must observe:
I suggest to don't call each other insulting names in a sarcastic or meant manner. other suggestions are needed from both participants.
This is just a suggestion and based on this post (http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=740496&postcount=78). I ask Kriger and Aryan Imperium to round this suggested form up, i.e. to decide about and to say whether you are agreeing with the topic description or at least with the point 3 - the scope of the debate, I suggested, please!