Are Some Races Inherently More Aggressive?

[Northern_Paladin]

Are Some Races Inherently More Aggressive?

Does that explain why Blacks rank 2nd after Whites as the ones with the most Social Status? Where as Asians who out excell blacks by far when it comes to Academics are so far behind?

I remember reading a study once that said blacks were the most aggressive race followed by whites. However how does that explain the fact explain Ghenghis Khan or Japanese aggression during WWII?

Why has China been comparitively non-aggressive during its entire existence up to modern times when compared to other Asian empires?

[President Barbicane]

It certainly appears that some races are more aggressive than others, of course it matters how one defines 'aggressive'. Keep in mind that even though east Asian men are (in general) more docile than white or black men, virile and aggressive Asian men (like Genghis Khan) do exist, they are just less common.

[Ken]

It certainly appears that some races are more aggressive than others, of course it matters how one defines 'aggressive'. Keep in mind that even though east Asian men are (in general) more docile than white or black men, virile and aggressive Asian men (like Genghis Khan) do exist, they are just less common.


Don't forget that these guys originated in Asia as well.

http://internal.usn.org/scott/4th/aztcfiles/aztecpics/aztecs40.gif

[calvin]

Aggression in high IQ races can be channelled constructively, where it becomes drive, persistence and daring. White people have a higher degree of controlled aggression. That's why the greatest explorers are white.

[Dreadnought]

I remember reading a study once that said blacks were the most aggressive race followed by whites. However how does that explain the fact explain Ghenghis Khan or Japanese aggression during WWII? Blacks seem unable to organise for shit so they are more individually aggressive. Whereas, you know what middle class Germans or Japs are like, very polite and calm (when sober), but in a uniform…

[Starr]

Aggression in high IQ races can be channelled constructively, where it becomes drive, persistence and daring. White people have a higher degree of controlled aggression. That's why the greatest explorers are white.


This is correct. Whites are much more able to harness and control their aggression. To use it effectively when neccessary or when it is to their benefit and to control it when it is not. (why they can be extremely brutal at times in a war like setting while living peacefully and with low mayhem and crime rates in other settings) Asians are similar in this way. Blacks on the other hand have less control over it and feel a need to exert it at the drop of a hat.

[KerguelenExileDissident]

I think aggression relies more on certain ethnic groups, sub-races, and rationalizations. Most Sub-Saharan black Negroids are quite violent for this is well documented. But Pygmies, Capoids, Proto-negroids, negritos and others are not nearly as violent. Several pygmies have complained to end the violence against them by Negroids in Africa to the UN with no avail. The Negroid groups (also the same group that lives abroad in the Americas) basically have been terrorizing the continent since the colonial powers left. Other areas such as Ethiopian black Semites and West Africans also tend to be less violent and more civil. Meantime American blacks are unknowingly for the most part descended from highly violent Africans groups (they were also most productive in manual labor) as well.

Outside of the "black races" I think it depends on regionalization. Christopher Columbus states that the tribes living in the Caribbean had almost no reality of war and lived in relative peace amongst themselves. Their cousins on the mainland such as Aztecs were very brutal however.

[Saqqara]

Don't forget that these guys originated in Asia as well.

http://internal.usn.org/scott/4th/aztcfiles/aztecpics/aztecs40.gif

You only wish you could do that! :222:

[Saqqara]

This is correct. Whites are much more able to harness and control their aggression. To use it effectively when neccessary or when it is to their benefit and to control it when it is not. (why they can be extremely brutal at times in a war like setting while living peacefully and with low mayhem and crime rates in other settings) Asians are similar in this way. Blacks on the other hand have less control over it and feel a need to exert it at the drop of a hat.

This.

White people exert all kinds of much more controlled behaviour. The behaviour it is highly dependent on what the result of such behaviour is. I've always been very fond of this Germanic ability to be agressive when called for and peaceful when not called for, and the discretion to determine which is which. The ability to be both ruthless and loving, to be friendly and a loner, violent and peaceful, emotional and logical, happy and stoic despair. All at the right times.

[Crowley]

Blacks are more impulsive than aggressive. They don't tend to sign on for the Marines in the services but rather hang back in the REMF region where it is safe and they can more easily steal. Spics and Whites are far more aggressive than Nigs, by a long shot.

[Saqqara]

The feeling from black people is that there isn't a lot of foresight. They seem to have largely underdeveloped frontal lobes.