Polygamy Hit Piece by Anderson Cooper Tonight

[Julian Curtis Lee]

I just saw the Anderson Cooper show (CNN) go hunting for polygamists in Utah. They tried real hard to make them seem sinister. I don't know why these media types are so disinterested in the sexual exploitation of children on the internet, or in the blatant depravity of promiscuous homosexuality, or in decrying the divorce rate. I think it would help the White racial decline if Whites would embrace polygamy heartily.

I was impressed that the few 'anti-polygamy' females they interviewed seemed like unhappy women, even unhealthy. The polygamous women were radiantly contented and articulate. The 'Lost Boys' thing they brought up was a crock.

[Sulla the Dictator]

I just saw the Anderson Cooper show (CNN) go hunting for polygamists in Utah. They tried real hard to make them seem sinister. I don't know why these media types are so disinterested in the sexual exploitation of children on the internet, or in the blatant depravity of promiscuous homosexuality, or in decrying the divorce rate. I think it would help the White racial decline if Whites would embrace polygamy heartily.


I also urge white supremacists to adopt the banner of polygamy.

And Creationism.

[Julian Curtis Lee]

Nobody mentioned "supremacists," your sullied brilliance. Or even banners. But it's nice to see that you agree with me.

[Sulla the Dictator]

Nobody mentioned "supremacists," your sullied brilliance. Or even banners. But it's nice to see that you agree with me.

Certainly. I wouldn't mind every idea I oppose united under one front. :D

Add socialism and gay marriage to the package. :p

[Vindex]

Because the system wants the genocide of the White race.


I just saw the Anderson Cooper show (CNN) go hunting for polygamists in Utah. They tried real hard to make them seem sinister. I don't know why these media types are so disinterested in the sexual exploitation of children on the internet, or in the blatant depravity of promiscuous homosexuality, or in decrying the divorce rate. I think it would help the White racial decline if Whites would embrace polygamy heartily.

I was impressed that the few 'anti-polygamy' females they interviewed seemed like unhappy women, even unhealthy. The polygamous women were radiantly contented and articulate. The 'Lost Boys' thing they brought up was a crock.

[Thomas777]

Add socialism and gay marriage to the package. :p


Why don't you want to be married?

[Thomas777]

I just saw the Anderson Cooper show (CNN) go hunting for polygamists in Utah. They tried real hard to make them seem sinister. I don't know why these media types are so disinterested in the sexual exploitation of children on the internet, or in the blatant depravity of promiscuous homosexuality, or in decrying the divorce rate. I think it would help the White racial decline if Whites would embrace polygamy heartily.

I was impressed that the few 'anti-polygamy' females they interviewed seemed like unhappy women, even unhealthy. The polygamous women were radiantly contented and articulate. The 'Lost Boys' thing they brought up was a crock.

The trouble is Julian that polygamy produces pretty undesirable social and political dynamics. It tends to result in cronyist societies and dictatorial rule by wealthy patriarchs who literally "horde" fertile females...that is the traditional objection to it.

[ironweed]

I just saw the Anderson Cooper show (CNN) go hunting for polygamists in Utah. They tried real hard to make them seem sinister. I don't know why these media types are so disinterested in the sexual exploitation of children on the internet, or in the blatant depravity of promiscuous homosexuality, or in decrying the divorce rate.

I haven't seen the show, but they probably went looking for them because they're freaks. Freaks get ratings points.

I think it would help the White racial decline if Whites would embrace polygamy heartily.

Oh? You'd be willing to let your daughter marry someone as wife #3 or #4? Or, hell, why stop there? Why not wife # 11?

The 'Lost Boys' thing they brought up was a crock.

This issue is discussed in depressing detail in Under the Banner of Heaven by Jon Krakauer. It is anything but a "crock." Large numbers of teenage boys are cut loose from pro-polygamy cults. And unless polygamists have somehow figured out a way to bring at least twice as many girls as boys into the world I fail to see anyone with two brain cells to rub together could conclude that this wouldn't be a problem.

[Julian Curtis Lee]

I haven't seen the show, but they probably went looking for them because they're freaks. Freaks get ratings points.

Poofters, sado-masochists, and fetishists are freaks. A man who practices serial-polygamy and has had dozens of illicit sexual relationships, he's a freak. People who mutilate their bodies, pierce themselves all over, and get their teeth, tongues and faces ruined to look like a lizard -- these are freaks. (I noticed a lot of these types at the last 'Gay Pride' rally in my town. One guy had these weird permanent horn-like things implanted in his forehead and was wearing these bizarre contacts and staring at everybody.) And I can think of worse who Cooper et al will never touch.

Committed, stable families having more than one wife are not truly freaks. They have roots that go way back in positive human culture. But I note that the first three groups are left untouched by shows like Cooper's. I have not seen any mainstream shows gawking at the bizarre promiscuity of homos, for example. Or the fetishists who seem to thrive among them.

Serial Polygamy is the only truly pathological form of polygamy, the only one with no traditional sanctions, and the form of polygamy widespread among the modernes who put on these stupid shows. The newscaster chick who kept shaking her head at the clips -- clips that showed homely but smart women long and happily married -- has probably been divorced three times already. She'll be on Zoloft in just a matter of time. These smarmy newscasters, and the pathological culture they lead, are the freaks.

[Jofreidr_1488]

I also urge white supremacists to adopt the banner of polygamy.

That is good since some of the nations top legal scholars believe that there is a very real chance that Polygamy may be legalized soon. (as a non-practicing polygamist I monitor this issue very closely)

Floodgates Open - USA Today Promotes Polygamy

Readers of Monday's edition of USA Today must have been shocked to read Jonathan Turley's article promoting the legalization of polygamy. Then again, it is becoming harder and harder to shock the American people. In any event, the article serves to prove the point that acceptance of homosexual marriage will open the floodgates to the normalization of any and all sexual relationships.

Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington Law School, is a well-known legal scholar. Indeed, he is one of America's foremost constitutional specialists, whose face became familiar to most Americans through media coverage of the Clinton sex scandals and the former president's impeachment trial. Turley offers a voice of professorial reason, and he has not been closely identified with social activism. Nevertheless, in his article published in USA Today, he presents a forceful case for the legalization of polygamy.

In the background is a case out of Utah which may lead the U.S. Supreme Court to review the right of states to criminalize polygamy. The plaintiff in that case, Tom Green, is a Utah polygamist who has been convicted in Utah, but has now appealed to the Supreme Court, citing the Court's 2003 decision Lawrence v. Texas which struck down laws criminalizing sodomy. As Turley comments, "If the court agrees to take the case, it would be forced to confront a 126-year-old decision allowing states to criminalize polygamy that few would find credible today, even as they reject the practice. And it could be forced to address glaring contradictions created in recent decisions of constitutional law."

As Turley sees it, laws against polygamy run counter to the logic of the constitution and lack credibility in today's context of sexual revolution. "Individuals have a recognized constitutional right to engage in any form of consensual sexual relationship with any number of partners," Turley argues. "Thus, a person can live with multiple partners and even sire children from different partners so long as they do not marry. However, when that same person accepts a legal commitment for those partners 'as a spouse,' we jail them."

The professor's logic makes sense--if we accept his premise that citizens have "a recognized constitutional right" to engage in any form of consensual sex with any number of partners, without respect to gender. As he sees it, criminalizing polygamy is nothing more than a form of national hypocrisy. Since no existing laws criminalize the sexual behavior, the criminalization is directed only at those who would solemnize their sexual relationships by claiming the institution of marriage. As Turley and polygamists see it, "it is simply a matter of unequal treatment under the law."

Beyond all this, Turley sees religious liberty as an underlying issue. "The difference between a polygamist and a follower of an 'alternative lifestyle' is often religion," he explains.

Link (http://www.rense.com/general58/poly.htm)

"it is simply a matter of unequal treatment under the law."

Sulla you aren't advocating some form of, uh oh... discrimination are you??

Anyhow Anderson Cooper has these segments every now and then, but the jew who has the most is Donny Deutch (douche) who probably does an hour attacking this White Sexual Orientation every week in his jewish supremacist zeal to suppress the White Populations numbers.

[Sulla the Dictator]

Sulla you aren't advocating some form of, uh oh... discrimination are you??


Sure am. Your lifestyle isn't equal to mine. You and the gay marriage crowd can go to Canada. :p

[Jofreidr_1488]

Alright, just as long as you admit you are a hate filled polygaphobe.