Of Mudsharks and Negroes

[Albertus Magnus]

... [C]ollege-educated females and males are more likely to exclude blacks than those with only high school degrees. ...

Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large.

http://paa2008.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=80046

Finally, modern research which states that only uneducated, lower class and/or morbidly obese white women find negroes physically attractive.

The mudshark truly is a worthless piece of subhuman filth.

[Ernest]

A lot of people seem not to get that you can be physically attractive, and a :tard:. It's common especially in females. You missed that category.

Then again some women are sexually into women, animals, children etc. Presumably it's possible to be attracted to apemen in a similar way. A proportion of people are just mentally defective in one way or another.

[Sudaev]

[C]ollege-educated females and males are more likely to exclude blacks than those with only high school degrees

Females with a university degree would likely seek men with a degree. This automatically excludes most negros.

[Count Sudoku]

Females with a university degree would likely seek men with a degree. This automatically excludes most negros.

I guess university degrees are good for something after all.

[Albertus Magnus]

A lot of people seem not to get that you can be physically attractive, and a :tard:. It's common especially in females. You missed that category.

That's a good point as well. In most cases, physical attractiveness and intelligence are negatively correlated with each other.

[harjit]

http://www.funnyforumpics.com//forums/this-thread-sucks/1/Care-Coleman.jpg

[Albertus Magnus]

Maybe some of us don't like mudsharks, the poisoners of our race, the servants of world jewry and the harbingers of degeneracy...

[Starr]

This can't possibly be. The media always tells me that it is ignorant and educated people who do not worship at the altar of multiculturalism.

[Morpheus]

While political views also have no effect on racial exclusion by
white men, white women who describe themselves as liberal or very liberal are less likely to exclude black men as dates than women who are not political, middle of the road, or conservative.

This is consistent with my experiences and observations.

I wouldn't take a study on internet dating as reflective of the majority of the population however.

[Argentlum]

A white woman who doesn't want black babies will avoid black men regardless of their standing.

[Albertus Magnus]

This is consistent with my experiences and observations.

I wouldn't take a study on internet dating as reflective of the majority of the population however.

Nevertheless, the evidence indicates that it is only white women of low intelligence and/or low educational attainment who consider intermarriage or interracial dating with negroes. Most of the time, the negro who intermarries is forced to settle with a white woman even more degraded in intellect and of much lower socioeconomic status than himself.

[Morpheus]

0HJ2EUExDxk&


Here's a "mudshark" seeking questions about "White culture?"

[Albertus Magnus]

I already consider that mudshark to be a full-fledged member of the negro race, no thanks to jewish brainwashing.

[mladikov]

I already consider that mudshark to be a full-fledged member of the negro race, no thanks to jewish brainwashing.
Cool anime avatar, fag.

[Sluggo892]

Here's a "mudshark" seeking questions about "White culture?"

She is obviously mentally unstable, but of course you wouldn't understand. All you see is a vagina.

[Albertus Magnus]

White women who date negroes tend to be extremely mentally sick.

[Thomas777]

0HJ2EUExDxk&


Here's a "mudshark" seeking questions about "White culture?"


She's probably some goofy immigrant or some low IQ silly woman who thinks ''culture'' has to do with purchasing habits.

Something odd about America is that its full of Blacks and immigrants who speak our language, worship in our churches, demand access to our institutions, and claim our history is theirs while knowing nothing of their own.

''You Whites have no culture'' said the monolingual English speaking Black who attends a Baptist church and fetishizes technological cargo to the White man who speaks the language of his ancestors and inherited their religious faith.

[Vindex]

She looks like a crackhead.

She is obviously mentally unstable, but of course you wouldn't understand. All you see is a vagina.

[harjit]

She is obviously mentally unstable, but of course you wouldn't understand. All you see is a vagina.
The majority of broads posting video logs expounding their opinions come across as unstable, or at least give off a bit of that vibe.

[harjit]

''You Whites have no culture'' said the monolingual English speaking Black who attends a Baptist church and fetishizes technological cargo to the White man who speaks the language of his ancestors and inherited their religious faith.
It can be argued that American blacks have done a halfway respectable job of creating some semblance of a culture, not without its problems but also with a prodigious output, out of a big total nothing.

Unless assimilated wogs like myself, or a great many whites for that matter, they can't be blamed for lacking a connection to their ancestral culture.

[limn]

0HJ2EUExDxk&


Here's a "mudshark" seeking questions about "White culture?"

When her offspring winds up spending the majority of his life behind bars she may begin to understand what is this 'White Culture' she inquires about.

[Albertus Magnus]

When her offspring winds up spending the majority of his life behind bars she may begin to understand what is this 'White Culture' she inquires about.

Normally it happens a lot earlier than that, presumably when she is being physically and mentally abused by her negro stud.

[Albertus Magnus]

As a general rule, when a white female commits bestiality with a negro, the white female is generally uneducated and of low IQ, being both intellectually and biologically inferior to the negro she is enamored of:

Most married couples have similar levels of education, which typically indicates that they are also somewhat similar in social position, background, and values. Most interracial couples also have relatively equal educational attainments. However, when interracial couples do differ in their education, a hierarchy of color is apparent. The darker the skin color of racial minorities, the more likely they are to have married whites “below” them, that is, with less education than themselves. Six of ten African Americans who marry whites with different levels of education marry whites less educated than themselves. Hispanics also tend to marry whites less educated than themselves, but Asian Americans marry whites at about the same educational level.

http://new.oberlin.edu/dotAsset/695448.pdf

[Cyril]

Interesting. And here I had been duped into thinking it was BLACK MEN who liked FAT WHITE CHICKS. Turns out they're just saving face by saying that they like it that way.

[Albertus Magnus]

And to think that the only kind of white women that date negroes are either fat bitches, airheads or both. A woman with a brain and an IQ above room temperature avoids the negro like the plague.

[von Sternberg]

Beware the mudshark,
intrigued by chimpish shitdin
She likes the pud dark
and seduction by impish shitskin

Accursed mudshark, who would have us drown in the brown!
May your offspring perish young and your soul suffer for eternity!

[Brechun]

As a general rule, when a white female commits bestiality with a negro,

Hey Ixabert.

[MadScienceType]

It can be argued that American blacks have done a halfway respectable job of creating some semblance of a culture, not without its problems but also with a prodigious output, out of a big total nothing.

Prodigious output of what?

Affaletes? Murder vicitms? Rap music? Illegitimate children?

Ironically, blacks were on the cusp of producing something resembling a worthwhile culture when the civil rights movement, the welfare state and a heavy dose of sheisskultur made them all Uncle Sammy's bitch again. Crackers too, but I hardly expect that part concerns you all that much.

[I am a Noun]

0HJ2EUExDxk&


Here's a "mudshark" seeking questions about "White culture?"

You couldn't find anyone who comes across as intelligent to ask the question? Thomas nailed it.

The one thing I dislike about youtube is that it gives an outlet to morons. Anyone with a webcam who thinks they developed a thought feels the need to share it. And the "discussions" that develop from these thoughts are some of the most embarrassingly ignorant drivel that you can come across. People are so attention hungry that substance doesn't matter.

[Morpheus]

When her offspring winds up spending the majority of his life behind bars she may begin to understand what is this 'White Culture' she inquires about.

Because White people don't go to jail?

[Albertus Magnus]

Because White people don't go to jail?

No, stupid. It's because negroes are disproportionately incarcerated relative to their actual numbers in the general population. The typical negro is far more likely to wind up in prison than the typical white; the mudshark simply encourages negro criminality by allowing herself to become a mobile baby manufacturing centre. Of course, the key here is "per capita," a term that seems to be very difficult for the liberal mind to grasp.

[Morpheus]

No, stupid. It's because negroes are disproportionately incarcerated relative to their actual numbers in the general population. The typical negro is far more likely to wind up in prison than the typical white; the mudshark simply encourages negro criminality by allowing herself to become a mobile baby manufacturing centre. Of course, the key here is "per capita," a term that seems to be very difficult for the liberal mind to grasp.

You're assuming that White women who date interracially target Black men who are more prone to criminality vs. Black men who are not.

Racists like to talk about disproportionate crime rates but the proportions of criminals among an ethnic group in America comes nowhere near approaching the majority. The majority of Black Americans are law-abiding citizens.

Here's something I considered about this particular study. Even if it's true that White women who describe themselves as fit are 7 times more likely to exclude Black men as dates than overweight White women that tells us nothing about what percentage of fit White women on these dating sites are open to interracial dating. All it implies is that overweight women are less picky about who they date and race does play a factor for fit women who are more selective about who they date.

[Monty]

The majority of Black Americans are law-abiding citizens.

That's an awful high bar. The high black felon rate is enough as it is. So if it ever hits 51%, you will care about race?

[Albertus Magnus]

You're assuming that White women who date interracially target Black men who are more prone to criminality vs. Black men who are not.

It is a fact that the only kind of white women who are attracted to negroes are uneducated and unintelligent. Besides, of those white women who do commit acts of bestiality with negroes, most have no interest in a Carleton Banks or a Steve Urkel type negro. More often than not, a white woman who cannot attract a dominant male of her own race will often seek a criminal negro as a substitute.

Racists like to talk about disproportionate crime rates but the proportions of criminals among an ethnic group in America comes nowhere near approaching the majority. The majority of Black Americans are law-abiding citizens.

How does this change the fact that negroes commit disproportionately more violent crime in America than any other racial or ethnic group?

Here's something I considered about this particular study. Even if it's true that White women who describe themselves as fit are 7 times more likely to exclude Black men as dates than overweight White women that tells us nothing about what percentage of fit White women on these dating sites are open to interracial dating. All it implies is that overweight women are less picky about who they date and race does play a factor for fit women who are more selective about who they date.

Wrong. It also implies that if negroes are attracting white women, they're only attracting the ones who are so fat they can't even see their own two feet. After all, the study also stated quite clearly that educated and fit white women are nowhere near as attracted to negroes as ignorant fat ones are.

[Starr]

It is a fact that the only kind of white women who are attracted to negroes are uneducated and unintelligent. Besides, of those white women who do commit acts of bestiality with negroes, most have no interest in a Carleton Banks or a Steve Urkel type negro. More often than not, a white woman who cannot attract a dominant male of her own race will often seek a criminal negro as a substitute.

.


Yes, they almost always seem to go for the gangsta types. The type the media tells them is cool and bad ass. I suspect the Carleton Banks types are no more sucessful with white women who love negroes than white men are. These women are attracted to a carefully crafted image more so than they truly are black men. Women, especially younger ones are attracted to bad asses and negroes are often sold in popular culture to women as the ultimate ultra masculine bad ass.

[Morpheus]

That's an awful high bar. The high black felon rate is enough as it is. So if it ever hits 51%, you will care about race?

Care about race in what sense? Will I assume that the cause of such statistics are biological differences between races? No.

I will believe that there is something seriously wrong with the system as well as social attitudes within certain communities.

My point is that most Blacks are not criminals so it cannot be assumed that White women who date interracially are attracted to thugs.


It is a fact that the only kind of white women who are attracted to negroes are uneducated and unintelligent.

That's not a fact that's just your opinion.



Besides, of those white women who do commit acts of bestiality with negroes......

You shouldn't expect to be taken seriously if you are going to liken interracial dating to bestiality....

most have no interest in a Carleton Banks or a Steve Urkel type negro.

So the only other type of Black man who isn't a thug is a nerd or an oreo?

What about the cool, athletic, laid back Black guys like Will Smith and Theo Huxtable?


How does this change the fact that negroes commit disproportionately more violent crime in America than any other racial or ethnic group?

The fact is that most Blacks do not commit crime so it cannot be concluded from a logical standpoint that White women who like Black men are looking for criminals. There are plenty of Black men who are not criminals.


Wrong. It also implies that if negroes are attracting white women, they're only attracting the ones who are so fat they can't even see their own two feet. After all, the study also stated quite clearly that educated and fit white women are nowhere near as attracted to negroes as ignorant fat ones are.

Not true.

Like I said, the study tells us nothing about how many fit and educated White women DO include Black men in their dating options. It only tells us that they are less likely to do so than fatter and less educated White women.

For all we know 50+% of White women in this study who are educated and fit are open to dating Black men 90+% of overweight, lesser educated White women are open to dating Black men. That would mean that most fit and educated White women are open to dating Black men. We simply don't know the overall percentages only a comparison of standards between different types of women.



Yes, they almost always seem to go for the gangsta types. The type the media tells them is cool and bad ass. I suspect the Carleton Banks types are no more sucessful with white women who love negroes than white men are. These women are attracted to a carefully crafted image more so than they truly are black men. Women, especially younger ones are attracted to bad asses and negroes are often sold in popular culture to women as the ultimate ultra masculine bad ass.

Do Will Smith and Theo Huxtable fit the badass persona you think every White woman who is open to dating interracially is interested in?

The average White racist might want to believe that every Black man that doesn't act like Carelton Banks acts like 50 cent but there are plenty of clean cut, well-behaved Black men out there who don't act like nerds.

The funny, athletic type guy isn't exactly a badass.

Like it or not more fit, educated White women than White racists are comfortable to admit like the Shemar Moore and Taye Diggs type Black guys
that even White racist women believe are handsome but wouldn't dare admit it. :p

Afterall if only fat, uneducated White women liked Black men there would be no controversy over interracial relationships. It's not just the rich Black men getting the smart, beautiful White women. There are alot of White women attracted to regular Black men who do not fit the gangsta stereotype.

Suggesting otherwise without support is just a way to cope with an uncomfortable reality.

[Monty]

Care about race in what sense? Will I assume that the cause of such statistics are biological differences between races? No.

So blacks have the same impulse control, intelligence and tendency toward violence as whites?


I will believe that there is something seriously wrong with the system as well as social attitudes within certain communities.

The civil rights regime has dumped billions of dollars and half a century trying to fix "attitudes" within "communities." Now, non-mulatto blacks are WORSE off than before.


What about the cool, athletic, laid back Black guys like Will Smith and Theo Huxtable?

Will Smith made a career out of being the black guy whom whites will accept, replacing OJ Simpson. Theo Huxtable was a fictional character purposely designed to make blacks look like proper members of bourgeois society.

[Morpheus]

So blacks have the same impulse control, intelligence and tendency toward violence as whites?

I don't believe that impulse control, intelligence or tendency towards violence are determined by race.



The civil rights regime has dumped billions of dollars and half a century trying to fix "attitudes" within "communities." Now, non-mulatto blacks are WORSE off than before.

Worse off than they were under Segregation and Jim Crow? I don't think so. The Black Middle Class has risen considerably. More Blacks own houses than ever before. Blacks are growing in representation in every major corporate position you can think of. Black academic performance has improved.

Crime is higher but I credit that to pushing drugs and guns into the inner cities during and after the Vietnam War.

If you're going the racialist route you should also consider that there are several majority Black countries with medium and low crime rates.

Also when you control for Socio-economic Status the crime gap disappears.

Will Smith made a career out of being the black guy whom whites will accept, replacing OJ Simpson. Theo Huxtable was a fictional character purposely designed to make blacks look like proper members of bourgeois society.

Will Smith as in the Fresh Prince.

Urkel and Banks are fictional characters also. I thought it was pretty clear that we were using fictional characters as representatives of real personalities.

[Monty]

I don't believe that impulse control, intelligence or tendency towards violence are determined by race.

The evidence is all on the other side.


Worse off than they were under Segregation and Jim Crow?

Once you factor out mulattoes and the so-called Talented Tenth, blacks today are actually worse off now than before.


Crime is higher but I credit that to pushing drugs and guns into the inner cities during and after the Vietnam War.

Drugs and guns were available before the Vietnam War. If anything, guns were easier to find.

Also when you control for Socio-economic Status the crime gap disappears.


Once you "control for Socio-economic Status," you are dealing with a lot of mixed-race people who list themselves as black..

[Morpheus]

The evidence is all on the other side.

I've read the scientific literature and the evidence seems to be on the environmentalist side. Can you name some outstanding arguments in favor of racialism?



Once you factor out mulattoes and the so-called Talented Tenth, blacks today are actually worse off now than before.

Mulattoes and Talented Tenth?

Who do you consider to be mulatto?

Who are these Talented Tenth? The Talented Tenth is an essay written by W.E.B. Dubious which theorized that 1/10th of Blacks reared on top quality education would become leaders of their race and improve Black society.

Surely you aren't implying that the only Black people who are well off are of mixed race enough to be called "mulatto" or within the 90th percentile of intelligence among Blacks.

What evidence do you have to support this?

Drugs and guns were available before the Vietnam War. If anything, guns were easier to find.

They most certainly were not easier to find and infact were mass produced during this time period. Hard drugs like Cocaine and Heroine were not trafficked on a large scale before this time period. The increase in the sell of weapons plus an increase in drug trafficking is what led to gang wars over drugs. This is an obvious and more plausible explanation for the high crime and incarceration rate of Blacks than Black people being innately violent and simply becoming more unruly as they were afforded more rights. The latter explanation is just wishful thinking of opportunistic racists.

Once you "control for Socio-economic Status," you are dealing with a lot of mixed-race people who list themselves as black..

Source?

[TheySeeYou]

White women sort of see white males as fags now. They are the geek stereotype in the minds of females now, thanks to all the commercials. they are even seen as being bad with tools and such.

Most white girls get fucked by niggers nowdays, but you know they're not gonna tell you that. they realize that they cant' get a black guy to stay with them and take care of them and be their bitch, so they find a white guy for that.

I mean, if you ever been around these black dudes, they have gorgeous white girls, calling THEM all day long, one after the other. They have girls comin to their college dorms, almost bumping into eachother in the halls, the hottest white chicks on campus.

Everywhere I go in this rich suburb, all you see is the most beautiful teenage girls are with the black guys, anywhere you go in Indianapolis, any bar, the best looking white girls will be with black guys. They will go out and fuck the black guys, and then go back to their white faggot boyfriends, who they will deny pussy, and train them to do what they want, but when they want fucked by a Man, they will go find a black guy and gulp his load down, do shit she will never do for the white guy.

I'm sorry, but that is the honest to God truth, and the fact you deny it is funny.

Anyways, I've seen these gorgeous teen white hoes, running around with these black guys, and then the next day, with their white boyfriends, nigger cum still in their snatch.

The white man has been fucked. His Mojo is gone. the niggers nuked the white man's mojo.

The white man is nuttin but a bitch and all black guys know it. They KNOW because they fuck white women all day long, they know how those gorgeous little white whores suck on their dicks, like they are mad about somethin.

Now not all black guys get an endless stream of white whore pussy, and not all white women are nigger loving sluts, but enough of them are to make some deserved generalizations. Especially in Indianapolis.



So we got a generation now, of white teenage boys, the majority of which, have mothers who have sucked many a negro cocks. Now if you believe in all that 'collective consciousness' and all that sort of stuff, how would that affect the psychology of these kids? having white mothers who've vigorously gulped down nigger load after nigger load of groid semen? well, witness their wigger behaviors, these women give birth to wiggers, and their daughters are born nigger sluts. their daughters are born with an instinct to fuck niggers anywhere, anyhow, anyways, anytime.

[Morpheus]

^ This is the most hilarious angry racist rant I have read in awhile. :rofl:

[Tellurocrat]

^ This is the most hilarious angry racist rant I have read in awhile. :rofl:
All down to sexual frustration, one hazards guessing.

Most likely a troll too, posting porn.

[TheySeeYou]

Of course probably nobody on here is an actual straight, racist white male, like most of the 'racist' message boards. I've come here to warn you you are all going to die soon, you have polluted this earth to such a degree you have cursed this planet to death. So be proud and laugh for a little while longer, you have very little time left.

I will leave your planet desolate, devoid of any good and godly spirits, only your fellow, viscious insane, mentally ill spirits will be left to inhabit this planet with you. None of you will be allowed to leave this planet, there will be guardian gods posted to prevent you from doing so.

This planet will be turned into a prison planet for the criminally insane.

[Tellurocrat]

This planet will be turned into a prison planet for the criminally insane.
And you'd finally feel at home.

[Tellurocrat]

I'm not white. Somewhat pinko-gray.

[TheySeeYou]

I'm not white. Somewhat pinko-gray.

Whatever you are I hate you and I don't know why.

[Tellurocrat]

Whatever you are I hate you and I don't know why.
Well, you know what half the problem is at least. That can't be a bad thing.

[Morpheus]

Posting porn for whatever purpose is clearly against the rules.....


Where did you find that video anyway TheySeeYou?

It's true that there are more attractive, intelligent White women who are open to dating Black men than White racists would like to acknowledge but I don't think it has anything to do with the emasculation of the White male image.

It probably has more to do with more White people seeing people of other races as humans who they can view as friends or lovers if they are attracted to them.

[Brechun]

Once you factor out mulattoes and the so-called Talented Tenth, blacks today are actually worse off now than before.

This 02 Sailer piece mentions this: (http://www.isteve.com/2002_How_White_Are_Blacks.htm)

Earlier, cruder studies, done before direct genetic testing was feasible, suggested that African-Americans were 25 or even 30 percent white. Shriver's project is not complete, but with data from 25 sites already in, he is coming up with 17-18 percent white ancestry among African-Americans. That's the equivalent of 106 of those 128 of your ancestors from seven generations ago having been Africans and 22 Europeans.

According to Shriver, only about 10 percent of African-Americans are over 50 percent white.

[Basil Fawlty]

@TheySeeYou - I have deleted your porn post and two flames. Any more of either and you're gone.

[Petr]

@TheySeeYou - I have deleted your porn post and two flames. Any more of either and you're gone.
TheySeeYou could be booted out already for all I care.


Petr

[Tellurocrat]

Like the poster St.Paul, he is very likely a troll.

[Monty]

TheySeeYou could be booted out already for all I care.

I think we ought to look behind the actions to see the root causes of his behavior. Surely Mr. You acts out because of an unmet need within himself. Perhaps he is lonely, looking for meaning or simply wishing to asset his own dignity.

One of the root causes is ignorance. Also, it is a lack of understanding, and false perceptions about others which amounts to a lack of knowledge, which once again translates back to ignorance.

Trolling is not particular to one group, all of us - no matter what race we are - experiences trolling. All of us need to be educated in an effort to minimize this kind of mentality.

None of us see reality in its most perfect and purest form. We interpret what we read, we interpret what we hear, we interpret what we see and we call that reality when actually it could be the furthest thing from the truth. Perceptions of others can be correct and on target, or they can be incorrect and well off target. Its a perception and only a perception. We need as a society to bridge the gap, and this can only be accomplished when people understand the past, let it go, and move on to the future. The problem we have today, is that some people refuse to let the past go, and tend to harbor great resentment.

Basically, people must be willing to change. Its not that they can not change, but they are in many cases unwilling to change.

If there is anything that is stead-fast and unchanging, it is change itself. Change is inevitable. However, positive change can only evolve from enlightenment and understanding. Once again, we all need to be educated.

[Basil Fawlty]

Basically, people must be willing to change. Its not that they can not change, but they are in many cases unwilling to change.

If there is anything that is stead-fast and unchanging, it is change itself. Change is inevitable. However, positive change can only evolve from enlightenment and understanding. Once again, we all need to be educated.From a Calvinist point of view, what is the point of valorising change given that it will not affect your fate one whit which was established before you were created? If, on the other hand, you believed in free will then what you say would make perfect sense.

[Monty]

From a Calvinist point of view, what is the point of valorising change given that it will not affect one whit your fate which was established before you were created?

You can't tell that the above was satire, can you? Root causes? We must all be re-educated?

[Basil Fawlty]

You can't tell that the above was satire, can you? Root causes? We must all be re-educated?What makes you think that? ;)

[TheySeeYou]

Seriously, I could care less about whether a girls boobs are big. Swedish women supposedly have the smallest breasts but are the most intelligent. Probably the smaller the penis, the more intelligent.

Guys who are infatuated with over-large breasts are infantile and extremely, incredibly hideous retards, as are women who are infatuated with large cocks.

All these idiotic women having breast implants are doing it because the kikes have told them this is how they will find love. All the adds on Fox News and all the neocon talk shows are for penis enhancement products, this entire culture is so bizarre and evil in the most base way imaginable, I'm sure the wicked energy it will soon warp reality and implode like a supernova.

Really smart girls have very tight pussies, so they don't really want a big cock, they want one that fits.

[TheySeeYou]

I think we ought to look behind the actions to see the root causes of his behavior. Surely Mr. You acts out because of an unmet need within himself. Perhaps he is lonely, looking for meaning or simply wishing to asset his own dignity.

One of the root causes is ignorance. Also, it is a lack of understanding, and false perceptions about others which amounts to a lack of knowledge, which once again translates back to ignorance.

Trolling is not particular to one group, all of us - no matter what race we are - experiences trolling. All of us need to be educated in an effort to minimize this kind of mentality.

None of us see reality in its most perfect and purest form. We interpret what we read, we interpret what we hear, we interpret what we see and we call that reality when actually it could be the furthest thing from the truth. Perceptions of others can be correct and on target, or they can be incorrect and well off target. Its a perception and only a perception. We need as a society to bridge the gap, and this can only be accomplished when people understand the past, let it go, and move on to the future. The problem we have today, is that some people refuse to let the past go, and tend to harbor great resentment.

Basically, people must be willing to change. Its not that they can not change, but they are in many cases unwilling to change.

If there is anything that is stead-fast and unchanging, it is change itself. Change is inevitable. However, positive change can only evolve from enlightenment and understanding. Once again, we all need to be educated.

You just don't get it, do you?
Sg9x5mUjbH8

Bunnies on the downlow.

I think people with small penises tend to lack a sense of humor.

One thing I've learned is, uneducated morons can only be so stupid. to take stupidy to the next level, you have to educate them.

Believe it or not I am here to help you with your problem, because I love white people.

[Albertus Magnus]

That's not a fact that's just your opinion.

No, it's a well-established empirical fact, regardless of whether you want to believe it or not:

Education is not a significant predictor of Asian exclusion for white men or women, but the findings suggest that college-educated females and males are more likely to exclude blacks than those with only high school degrees.


You shouldn't expect to be taken seriously if you are going to liken interracial dating to bestiality....

I guess you haven't heard that negroes are Homo erectus:

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/


So the only other type of Black man who isn't a thug is a nerd or an oreo?

What about the cool, athletic, laid back Black guys like Will Smith and Theo Huxtable?

Oh great, fictional TV characters.


The fact is that most Blacks do not commit crime so it cannot be concluded from a logical standpoint that White women who like Black men are looking for criminals. There are plenty of Black men who are not criminals.

But many negroes do commit crime and more so than any other race; thus, because lower class white females of low intelligence are often attracted to raw animal aggression, they often seek out negro criminals to gratify their bestiality fetish.


Not true.

Like I said, the study tells us nothing about how many fit and educated White women DO include Black men in their dating options. It only tells us that they are less likely to do so than fatter and less educated White women.

Which is the same thing as saying that fatter and less educated white women are more likely to date negroes than those who are skinnier and more educated. What the study does tell us is that attractive and educated white women are far less likely to date negroes than those who are fat and stupid. Also, the study states that:

Our analysis of the predictors of the exclusion of blacks and Asians provides some support for the idea that gendered cultural portrayals and stereotypes about groups shape racial preferences. Our finding that white women who do not fit conventional norms of beauty (i.e. those who are not thin or athletic-looking) are much more likely to include black men as possible dates than other white women is consistent with the notion that cultural ideals about beauty shape racial preferences. Much research has shown that, in dating and marriage markets, physical attractiveness is a more valued trait for women than men (Stewart, Stinnet and Rosenfeld 2000). Therefore, an openness to dating black men among these white women may actually reflect their knowledge that they do not fit the conventional beauty standards that appeal to white men.

White women who date negroes do so because they are unable to attract desirable white males.


For all we know 50+% of White women in this study who are educated and fit are open to dating Black men 90+% of overweight, lesser educated White women are open to dating Black men. That would mean that most fit and educated White women are open to dating Black men. We simply don't know the overall percentages only a comparison of standards between different types of women.

The study says in plain English that fat and stupid white women are more likely to date negroes than white women who are skinny and educated. Why is this so difficult to understand?

[Morpheus]

No, it's a well-established empirical fact, regardless of whether you want to believe it or not:

Education is not a significant predictor of Asian exclusion for white men or women, but the findings suggest that college-educated females and males are more likely to exclude blacks than those with only high school degrees.


The key words are in blue. More likely does not mean all so your generalizations are not correct.


I guess you haven't heard that negroes are Homo erectus:

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/


Are you really trying to feed me racist pseudoscience about Black people not being human?



Oh great, fictional TV characters.

Yeah, like Steve Irkel and Careltoon Banks. Are you saying that Black men who behave like Smith and Huxtable do not exist?

But many negroes do commit crime and more so than any other race; thus, because lower class white females of low intelligence are often attracted to raw animal aggression, they often seek out negro criminals to gratify their bestiality fetish.

Just because Blacks in America commit a disproportionate amount of crime doesn't mean White women who like Black men do so because they are attracted to the ghetto mentality. Some might but doesn't mean most are.




The study says in plain English that fat and stupid white women are more likely to date negroes than white women who are skinny and educated. Why is this so difficult to understand?

Think about it for a second and what I am saying to you will become clear.

Fat, stupid women may have more of a tendency to include Black men as dates but that doesn't tell us how many smart, fit women include Black men as dates.

You simply can't come to the conclusion that few or none do based on the info provided.

[harjit]

The study says in plain English that fat and stupid white women are more likely to date negroes than white women who are skinny and educated. Why is this so difficult to understand?
You still haven't addressed his point.

Your assertion in earlier posts was that virtually NO skinny/smart white women accept black men in their dating preferences. Here are some instances:
White women who date negroes do so because they are unable to attract desirable white males.
It is a fact that the only kind of white women who are attracted to negroes are uneducated and unintelligent.
Wrong. It also implies that if negroes are attracting white women, they're only attracting the ones who are so fat they can't even see their own two feet.

Let's call this assertion A.

The facts you have presented: 7 times as many fat/dumb white women accept black men as do skinny/smart women.

So if it turns out over 90% of fat/dumb white women accept black men, that means that over 13% of skinny/smart white women do, which is far from NONE.

So until we know the percentage of fat/dumb white women who accept black men, you cannot assert A.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

[Monty]

http://1dl.us/uploads/128117099282281.jpg


Did I miss anything? :-)

[il ragno]

Call him what you want - off-his-meds psychotic, retard savant, Nostradumbass - but I miss TheySeeYou already.

He had a way of getting directly to the point....

White women sort of see white males as fags now. They are even seen as being bad with tools and such.


I've come here to warn you you are all going to die soon, you have polluted this earth to such a degree you have cursed this planet to death. So be proud and laugh for a little while longer, you have very little time left. I will leave your planet desolate, devoid of any good and godly spirits, only your fellow, viscious insane, mentally ill spirits will be left to inhabit this planet with you. None of you will be allowed to leave this planet, there will be guardian gods posted to prevent you from doing so.


We got a generation now of white teenage boys, the majority of (whose) mothers who have sucked many a negro cocks.



One thing I've learned is, uneducated morons can only be so stupid. to take stupidy to the next level, you have to educate them.



Whatever you are I hate you and I don't know why.

[Brechun]

I guess you haven't heard that negroes are Homo erectus:

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/

I shouldn't be too surprised you would cite some hardcore fringe multiregionalism that genuinely believes blacks (and aborigines and the andamanese) are some kind of subhuman h. erectus offshoot- not even fully human. It's pretty telling when that book gave even Jared Taylor some bad vibes.

Regardless, Mansa, do you realize how vague an indicator of "correcting for SES" is of anything?

[Albertus Magnus]

The key words are in blue. More likely does not mean all so your generalizations are not correct.

Yes, but it does indicate that the vast majority of educated white women would exclude negroes as potential dates, which is all that is needed for the generalization to be correct.

Are you really trying to feed me racist pseudoscience about Black people not being human?

Nevertheless, there is some evidence that negroes may not be as human as some researchers think they are.


Yeah, like Steve Irkel and Careltoon Banks. Are you saying that Black men who behave like Smith and Huxtable do not exist?

Those are works of fiction, stupid, not reality.


Just because Blacks in America commit a disproportionate amount of crime doesn't mean White women who like Black men do so because they are attracted to the ghetto mentality. Some might but doesn't mean most are.

Listen, the vast majority of white females aren't attracted to negroes and those who are tend to be morbidly obese, of low intelligence or both. We all know what most women are attracted to, and given the fact that negroes often come up short in the financial department, guess who the majority of these fat and stupid white women end up with... and no, it's not Steve Urkel.


Fat, stupid women may have more of a tendency to include Black men as dates but that doesn't tell us how many smart, fit women include Black men as dates.

It does tell us that intelligent and physically attractive women rarely include negroes as dates, whereas very fat and stupid ones do so on a regular basis.


You simply can't come to the conclusion that few or none do based on the info provided.

I didn't say all, stupid. However, the vast majority of normal, educated and physically attractive white women are not attracted to negroes.

[Albertus Magnus]

You still haven't addressed his point.

Your assertion in earlier posts was that virtually NO skinny/smart white women accept black men in their dating preferences.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

I was obviously speaking in generalities, stupid. It is a fact which is well-supported by the evidence that, in general, educated and physically attractive white women avoid negroes and other minorities like the plague, whereas their uglier and less intelligent sisters do not.

[Albertus Magnus]

I shouldn't be too surprised you would cite some hardcore fringe multiregionalism that genuinely believes blacks (and aborigines and the andamanese) are some kind of subhuman h. erectus offshoot- not even fully human. It's pretty telling when that book gave even Jared Taylor some bad vibes.

The book was endorsed by English psychologist Richard Lynn and the book was highly praised by Jared Taylor, despite some misgivings for certain of the author's stylistic idiosyncracies.

[Count Sudoku]

The book was endorsed by English psychologist Richard Lynn and the book was highly praised by Jared Taylor, despite some misgivings for certain of the author's stylistic idiosyncracies.

That book would be more effective if it was toned down a tad starting with the cover.

[Morpheus]

Nevertheless, there is some evidence that negroes may not be as human as some researchers think they are.

No there isn't. Homo Sapiens are a species and a species is defined as a group of organisms who are able to breed among themselves and produce fertile offspring.

Black people are not members of Homo Erectus. Only an idiot would suggest otherwise.



Those are works of fiction, stupid, not reality.

Are you retarded? Are Steve Urkel and Carleton Banks real people?

You're the one who brought up fictional characters to define different types of Black men. I simply countered that with other fictional characters.

So again, are you saying that Black men with the personalities of Will Smith and Theo Huxtable don't exist?

There are Black men as smooth as the Fresh Prince and as intelligent as Urkel.


I didn't say all, stupid. However, the vast majority of normal, educated and physically attractive white women are not attracted to negroes.

Actually you did say all. Harjit quoted you as saying as much.

The study does indicate that among online daters there are far fewer White women who are in shape and well educated who include Black men as dates. We don't know the exact percentage but you cannot generalize that nearly all of them exclude Blacks.

In any case there are clearly enough intelligent, beautiful White women who date Black men to cause outrage among White racists. Otherwise you guys wouldn't be so fixated on it.

Even if the percentage is as small a 10% that's still millions of White women who are open to dating Black men.

[Albertus Magnus]

No there isn't. Homo Sapiens are a species and a species is defined as a group of organisms who are able to breed among themselves and produce fertile offspring.

Black people are not members of Homo Erectus. Only an idiot would suggest otherwise.

Even different species can interbreed, such as horses, mules, donkeys, zebras, and even Neanderthals, so it's still possible for Homo erectus to interbreed with lower forms of Homo sapiens.


Are you retarded? Are Steve Urkel and Carleton Banks real people?

You're the one who brought up fictional characters to define different types of Black men. I simply countered that with other fictional characters.

So again, are you saying that Black men with the personalities of Will Smith and Theo Huxtable don't exist?

There are Black men as smooth as the Fresh Prince and as intelligent as Urkel.


Don't you find it pretty pathetic that you need to mention imaginary characters in order to prove how magical negroes are?


Actually you did say all. Harjit quoted you as saying as much.

The study does indicate that among online daters there are far fewer White women who are in shape and well educated who include Black men as dates. We don't know the exact percentage but you cannot generalize that nearly all of them exclude Blacks.

In any case there are clearly enough intelligent, beautiful White women who date Black men to cause outrage among White racists. Otherwise you guys wouldn't be so fixated on it.

Even if the percentage is as small a 10% that's still millions of White women who are open to dating Black men.

Let me explain this over again in order to help your primitive negro mind understand:

All of the latest research indicates that white women who do find negroes attractive are for the most part, unintelligent and obese, whereas smart and attractive women rarely consider negroes as potential dates. The generalization that the uglier, fatter and stupider a woman, the more likely she is to be attracted to negroes is one that is well-supported by the available scientific evidence.

[Brechun]

The book was endorsed by English psychologist Richard Lynn

So? That endorsement is a high mark of credibility? I saw that amazon review Fuerle posted where he quoted Lynn as calling it "terrific" and saying he agreed with "99% of it." I guess that can serve as an excellent case of Lynn's credibility being near non-existent.

and the book was highly praised by Jared Taylor, despite some misgivings for certain of the author's stylistic idiosyncracies.

Really? He seemed put off by more than just stylistic issues:

Erectus Walks Amongst Us is stuffed with so much information and so many good arguments it is a pity it suffers from several flaws. First and worst, the title and cover illustration are so insulting to blacks — implying that they are primitives just down from the trees — that one can hardly carry this book around in public. The writing can also be contemptuous of blacks and of people who accept the Out of Africa theory. No book that flouts as many orthodoxies as this one does can afford to aid its critics by indulging in intemperate language.

Fuerle doesn't share those qualms, though, since the entire book paints africans* and similar populations as like that. You seem to think that lowly of them as well, though as I imagine most people who embrace this trash would.

*In this case, I mean specifically west africans and bantus. He doesn't just believe east africans are hybrid populations- he also believes pygmies have "caucasian" ancestry (probably by way of their more prominent brows than other africans, and their greater body hair) and he also believes sudanese blacks and khoisan are hybridized with ancient mongoloid populations, by way of things like them their high frequencies of epicanthic folds. Anything that deviates slightly from the prototypical negroid mold just has to be that way by of some mysterious ancient admixture.

This doesn't even scratch the surface of the surreal shit that pervades that book. Much of it basically defies basic facts of human history and even laws of biology and genetics. For fuck's sake, the guy cites March of the Titans in relation to ideas like Ghengis Khan being a red head or Portugal falling due to race mixing.

Even different species can interbreed, such as horses, mules, donkeys, zebras, and even Neanderthals, so it's still possible for Homo erectus to interbreed with lower forms of Homo sapiens.

Obviously fertility isn't a clear cut definition of speciation- in fact, a more proper definition would be if they can't produce fertile offspring. Just because they can doesn't mean they're the same species.

Regardless, you'd be unbelievably hard pressed to find a shred of genetic evidence suggesting any human population is some kind of wretched h. erectus hybrid or whatever. Do you realize how blatant that'd be? But no, the entire cornerstone of modern human genetics must be operating on political correctness to deny that, because surely you'd have to be PC to not think some people aren't fully human. For example: http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2010/04/comparing-neanderthal-and-modern-human.html

The answer is ‘yes’ if we look at individual DNA sequences, as shown in the first graph (above):

Thus, the largest difference observed between any two human sequences was two substitutions larger than the smallest difference between a human and the Neandertal. In total, 0.002% of the pairwise comparisons between human mtDNA sequences were larger than the smallest difference between the Neandertal and a human (Krings et al., 1997)

It may be noted that a small fraction (0.037%) of the inter-human comparisons are larger than the smallest distance (29 substitutions) between the Neandertal and humans. (Krings et al., 1999)


We see the same genetic overlap among present-day human populations. Some Danes seem to be closer to some Congolese than to other Danes. But this overlap disappears when we compare more than one DNA sequence at the same time. The more sequences we compare simultaneously, the less overlap there is (Risch et al., 2002; Sesardic, 2010).

These Krings et. al. papers were cited by Fuerle to support the idea africans aren't human, among a handful of others. Beyond this, your reasons seem to be "Look, I just hate niggers so much that I don't like to think of them as human, ok?"

Ironically enough, those Krings et. al. papers, atleast in those cases, suffer from Lewontin's Fallacy when applied to species. But that's ok when it's used to prove niggers aren't human, right?

[harjit]

Actually you did say all. Harjit quoted you as saying as much.
Common net racist tactic: Sprinkle in a few absolutist or exaggerated claims here and there to imperceptibly/subconsciously increase the emotional impact of their argument. When called on it try to sound reasonable by claiming "Well, I don't mean ALL of them".

[Winston]

Common net racist tactic: Sprinkle in a few absolutist or exaggerated claims here and there to imperceptibly/subconsciously increase the emotional impact of their argument. When called on it try to sound reasonable by claiming "Well, I don't mean ALL of them".
More like common human behavior.

[Monty]

When called on it try to sound reasonable by claiming "Well, I don't mean ALL of them".

The racialist is trying to explain to you that statistical outliers exist. What's wrong with that?

[Abelard De Villeneuve]

Homo Sapiens are a species and a species is defined as a group of organisms who are able to breed among themselves and produce fertile offspring.

Ability to interbreed is the criterion for the ability to interbreed. Reductionism = idiocy.

Even wikipedia, where you no doubt found this claim, admits "while in many cases this definition [interfertility - ed] is adequate, more precise or differing measures are often used, such as based on similarity of DNA or morphology." Negroids are quite genetically distant from Aryans and have vastly different morphology, i.e. wool instead of hair, pigment in the stratum mucosum, different form of musculature, smaller brain case, prognathous skull shape, etc.

All of this is more or less argument over the meaning of a word anyway, since any fool with five working senses - who hasn't been indoctrinated into retardation - can tell that groids are not humans, and vice versa.

Even different species can interbreed, such as horses, mules, donkeys, zebras, and even Neanderthals, so it's still possible for Homo erectus to interbreed with lower forms of Homo sapiens.

This is true, but Negroids are not in fact Homo erectus - they are diverse hybrids of sapiens and erectus which arose from the former's migrations into Africa. There is as much genetic distance between two tribes of Negroids as between two human races for this reason.

But you bring up a good point - it is in the intermediate types where inter-species breeding can and does occur, the outliers cannot and do not interbreed thus putting the lie to Morpheus' politically correct definition of species.

[Albertus Magnus]

So? That endorsement is a high mark of credibility? I saw that amazon review Fuerle posted where he quoted Lynn as calling it "terrific" and saying he agreed with "99% of it." I guess that can serve as an excellent case of Lynn's credibility being near non-existent.

The great English psychologist Lynn endorsed the book, which is more than enough proof that Fuerle's book should be on every thoughtful layman's bookshelf. It takes character and intelligence to recognize a bold and revolutionary new work when one sees one and those traits nicely sum up those who sense greatness in the pages of Fuerle's masterwork.

Really? He seemed put off by more than just stylistic issues:

Besides that, he thought the content was excellent and packed with fascinating information.

Fuerle doesn't share those qualms, though, since the entire book paints africans* and similar populations as like that. You seem to think that lowly of them as well, though as I imagine most people who embrace this trash would.

*In this case, I mean specifically west africans and bantus. He doesn't just believe east africans are hybrid populations- he also believes pygmies have "caucasian" ancestry (probably by way of their more prominent brows than other africans, and their greater body hair) and he also believes sudanese blacks and khoisan are hybridized with ancient mongoloid populations, by way of things like them their high frequencies of epicanthic folds. Anything that deviates slightly from the prototypical negroid mold just has to be that way by of some mysterious ancient admixture.

This doesn't even scratch the surface of the surreal shit that pervades that book. Much of it basically defies basic facts of human history and even laws of biology and genetics. For fuck's sake, the guy cites March of the Titans in relation to ideas like Ghengis Khan being a red head or Portugal falling due to race mixing.

That negroes are another species is a very bold and daring hypothesis worthy of the most serious consideration. Of course, being so deeply under the spell of PC and left-wing egalitarianism, it's obvious why you would have such trouble with the notion that negroes might not be fully human.

Obviously fertility isn't a clear cut definition of speciation- in fact, a more proper definition would be if they can't produce fertile offspring. Just because they can doesn't mean they're the same species.

It depends on the hybrid species, but many hybrids can produce fertile offspring just as easily as the parental populations they were spawned from.

Regardless, you'd be unbelievably hard pressed to find a shred of genetic evidence suggesting any human population is some kind of wretched h. erectus hybrid or whatever. Do you realize how blatant that'd be? But no, the entire cornerstone of modern human genetics must be operating on political correctness to deny that, because surely you'd have to be PC to not think some people aren't fully human. For example: http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2010/04/comparing-neanderthal-and-modern-human.html

Scientists have found genetic evidence of Neanderthal admixture in modern non-African populations, so it's only a matter of time before they find evidence of Homo erectus admixture in negroes. Besides, given the great genetic distances between negroes and humans (which is even greater than that for most animal species) and the similarity of negroid bone structure with that of the fossilized remains of Homo erectus, many scholars are now entertaining the possibility that negroes may be a separate species of primate.

These Krings et. al. papers were cited by Fuerle to support the idea africans aren't human, among a handful of others. Beyond this, your reasons seem to be "Look, I just hate niggers so much that I don't like to think of them as human, ok?"

Ironically enough, those Krings et. al. papers, atleast in those cases, suffer from Lewontin's Fallacy when applied to species. But that's ok when it's used to prove niggers aren't human, right?

Niggers probably aren't human. Deal with it already.

[Brechun]

Negroids are quite genetically distant from Aryans

:vuvu: :vuvu: :vuvu:

[Brechun]

Jose, since your post consists of unabashed cult-like admiration of Lynn, thinking it's a genuine possibility blacks aren't human, that this was ignored because everyone is so addled with PC that every single facet of modern biology overlooked it, and thus can't turn up a shred of evidence for it, so that only Fuerle and niggermania/chimpout posters would dare genuinely consider this, think neanderthals aren't human, and likewise think ancestry from them is so much better than h. erectus ancestry, and likewise don't extend this to meaning non-africans are non-human, say that the difference between africans and eurasians is larger than most animal species, and finally, say many scholars are entertaining the possibility niggers might not be human, I think I'll sidestep and ask you why you wrote things like this on Dodona:

http://dodona.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=physanth&thread=6952&page=2#84272
http://dodona.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=galvez