View Full Version : Holocaust denier running for Attorney General in Alabama
Starr
05-13-2006, 07:07 AM
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--alabamaattorneyge0512may12,0,1010796.story?coll=ny-region-apnewjersey
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- A Democratic candidate for Alabama attorney general denies the Holocaust occurred and said Friday he will speak this weekend in New Jersey to a "pro-white" organization that is widely viewed as being racist.
Larry Darby concedes his views are radical, but he said they should help him win wide support among Alabama voters as he tries to "reawaken white racial awareness" with his campaign against Mobile County District Attorney John Tyson.
The state Democratic chairman, Joe Turnham, said the party became aware of some of Darby's views only days ago and was considering what to do about his candidacy.
"Any type of hatred toward groups of people, especially for political gain, is completely unacceptable in the Alabama Democratic Party," said Turnham.
Speaking in an interview with The Associated Press, Darby said he believes no more than 140,000 Jewish people died in Europe during World War II, and most of them succumbed to typhus.
Historians say about 6 million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazis, but Darby said the figure is a false claim of the "Holocaust industry."
"I am what the propagandists call a Holocaust denier, but I do not deny mass deaths that included some Jews," Darby said. "There was no systematic extermination of Jews. There's no evidence of that at all."
Darby said he will speak Saturday near Newark, N.J., at a meeting of National Vanguard, which bills itself as an advocate for the white race. Some of his campaign materials are posted on the group's Internet site.
"It's time to stop pushing down the white man. We've been discriminated against too long," Darby said in the interview.
New Jersey's Democratic State Committee chief on Friday decried Darby's planned visit, and said in a statement that denying the Holocaust was "historical blasphemy."
"Hate and prejudice are destructive qualities that are not welcome in New Jersey and should be condemned wherever they occur," said party Chairman Joe Cryan. "Mr. Darby should turn around before crossing the Jersey stateline and then give thought to turning his abhorrent attitudes around as well."
A poll published last month indicated the Democratic race for attorney general was up for grabs. The survey showed 21 percent favored Tyson to 12 percent for Darby, but 68 percent of respondents were undecided.
Darby, founder of the Atheist Law Center and a longtime supporter of separation of church and state, said he has no money for campaign advertising and has made only a few campaign speeches.
Tyson said aside from his views on race and the Holocaust, Darby also has publicly advocated legalizing drugs and shooting all illegal immigrants.
"I am astonished as anyone has ever been that anyone is running for public office in Alabama on that platform," said Tyson. "I do not take him as a serious candidate."
Turnham said the party began an investigation last week after hearing about some of Darby's comments in a television interview. While the party supports the free-speech rights of any candidate, Turnham said some of Darby's views appear to be in "a realm of thought that is unacceptable."
"We have Holocaust survivors and families of Holocaust survivors here in Alabama, and many of them are members of the Democratic Party," said Turnham.
The winner of the Democratic primary on June 6 will face either Republican Attorney General Troy King or Mark Montiel, who is opposing King in the GOP primary.
Anima Eternae
05-13-2006, 07:17 AM
I'm all for legalized weed and sentry guns on the border... :p
Fade the Butcher
05-13-2006, 07:45 PM
If there is any place in America he can win, I can assure you it is Alabama. I saw a poll just the other day about my home state that indicates the majority of whites in Alabama already favor the explusion of all illegal aliens from the United States. Makes me proud.
Starr
05-13-2006, 08:03 PM
If there is any place in America he can win, I can assure you it is Alabama. I saw a poll just the other day about my home state that indicates the majority of whites in Alabama already favor the explusion of all illegal aliens from the United States. Makes me proud.
If an honest poll was taken, there would be lots of people all over the country who would be in favor of getting rid of illegals.
Fade the Butcher
05-13-2006, 08:07 PM
The poll was taken in thirty-three states.
Fade the Butcher
05-13-2006, 08:09 PM
Massachusetts was the only state that fell below 60% of the public wanting enforcement of our existing immigration laws made a priority in any new immigration reform coming out of Congress. 57% of the public in Massachusetts wanted that; the most liberal state in America.
If there is any place in America he can win, I can assure you it is Alabama. I saw a poll just the other day about my home state that indicates the majority of whites in Alabama already favor the explusion of all illegal aliens from the United States. Makes me proud.
He won't win, of course, but if it isn't too late I'll register to vote for him.
Starr
05-16-2006, 12:06 AM
I have seen a couple of things on TV about this guy, now. And the response is the expected one. How terrible it is that a guy with views like this is allowed to have this type of career" "Why is he allowed to have any kind of voice"(in other words allowing white people to have any kind of voice is unacceptable. Fuck these people) He does not believe the official story regarding the holocaust and he wants to, as he said, awaken white racial awareness. Where is the evil in this?
B-Pep
05-16-2006, 12:15 AM
He's certainly throwing a wrench in the ZOG's "love" for freedom and demockary. I hope his candidacy and the smearing campaign/suppression that will be launched against him open the eyes of atleast a few people to the type of system we are enslaved by.
Sulla the Dictator
05-16-2006, 12:34 AM
If there is any place in America he can win, I can assure you it is Alabama.
I had thought the only positive development during your time here is that you had abandoned the silly fantasy that lunatics in your movement have any chance of winning in democratic politics. A few months ago you were distancing yourself from these embarassing crackpots.
Now you're rooting for him? One step forward, two steps back.
Starr
05-16-2006, 12:40 AM
If this guy were to actually win anything, I will look into my chances of being elected Pope. this guy would not be allowed to win.
what makes this guy a lunatic, Sulla? He probably should have at least stayed away from the holocaust denial shit, since a lot of regular white people who he may want to reach, don't give a shit about the holocaust. He still would have gotten the attention just for taking about white rights,etc.
Ahknaton
05-16-2006, 12:40 AM
I've got cousins in Mobile, perhaps I should phone them up and do a bit of intercontinental electioneering. :D
Fade the Butcher
05-16-2006, 03:59 AM
I had thought the only positive development during your time here is that you had abandoned the silly fantasy that lunatics in your movement have any chance of winning in democratic politics. A few months ago you were distancing yourself from these embarassing crackpots.
The majority of whites in Alabama (and quite a few blacks) voted as recently as 2000 (it may have been 1999) to keep the state anti-miscegenation law. In 2004, Alabama voters defeated a purely symbolic attempt to strike out segregationist language in the Alabama state constitution. You seem to be confusing racialism with the White Nationalist movement. In my experience, a clear majority of whites in Alabama are closer to my position on race than yours. The vast majority of racialists in America have never heard of websites like Stormfront, National Vanguard, VNN and so on. The fraternities and sororities at both UA and Auburn are still segregated even today. I know there might be a strict taboo against "racism" in other parts of the country, but I never experienced that growing up. The existence and reality of race is still taken seriously by millions of Americans.
Now you're rooting for him? One step forward, two steps back.
I think it would be hilarious if he won. Imagine the reaction that would generate in the media.
Ahknaton
05-16-2006, 04:16 AM
The majority of whites in Alabama (and quite a few blacks) voted as recently as 2000 (it may have been 1999) to keep the state anti-miscegenation law.Wow, I never knew those laws were still on the books in some states of the US.
I visited Alabama in 1996 or so. My cousin had an Asian girlfriend, and it didn't seem to be considered outrageous by anyone. Does it only apply to Black/White couples?
Starr
05-16-2006, 04:17 AM
The majority of whites in Alabama (and quite a few blacks) voted as recently as 2000 (it may have been 1999) to keep the state anti-miscegenation law.
Interesting, this is something of which I had no idea. Also interesting to hear that many blacks also support these things. Those blacks have more sense then a lot of white idiots out there.
That must be quite a slap in the face to those who seek to destroy our culture.
Fade the Butcher
05-16-2006, 04:21 AM
Wow, I never knew those laws were still on the books in some states of the US.I visited Alabama in 1996 or so. My cousin had an Asian girlfriend, and it didn't seem to be considered outrageous by anyone. Does it only apply to Black/White couples?
The law was repealed, but a majority of whites voted to keep it (Alabama has one of the largest black populations in America). The amendment to eliminate segregation was defeated. I voted in that election. In any case, the law had been unenforceable for decades since Loving v. Virginia struck down the remaining anti-miscegenation laws in 1967.
Fade the Butcher
05-16-2006, 04:26 AM
Interesting, this is something of which I had no idea. Also interesting to hear that many blacks also support these things. Those blacks have more sense then a lot of white idiots out there.
Alabama Vote Opens Old Racial Wounds (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16443-2004Nov27.html)
School Segregation Remains a State Law as Amendment Is Defeated
By Manuel Roig-Franzia
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 28, 2004; Page A01
TUSCALOOSA, Ala. -- On that long-ago day of Alabama's great shame, Gov. George C. Wallace (D) stood in a schoolhouse door and declared that his state's constitution forbade black students to enroll at the University of Alabama.
He was correct.
If Wallace could be brought back to life today to reprise his 1963 moment of infamy outside Foster Auditorium, he would still be correct. Alabama voters made sure of that Nov. 2, refusing to approve a constitutional amendment to erase segregation-era wording requiring separate schools for "white and colored children" and to eliminate references to the poll taxes once imposed to disenfranchise blacks.
The vote was so close -- a margin of 1,850 votes out of 1.38 million -- that an automatic recount will take place Monday. But, with few expecting the results to change, the amendment's saga has dragged Alabama into a confrontation with its segregationist past that illuminates the sometimes uneasy race relations of its present.
The outcome resonates achingly here in this college town, where the silver-haired men and women who close their eyes and lift their arms when the organ wails at Bethel Baptist Church -- a short drive from Wallace's schoolhouse door -- don't have to strain to remember riding buses past the shiny all-white school on their way to the all-black school.
"There are people here who are still fighting the Civil War," said Tommy Woods, 63, a deacon at Bethel and a retired school administrator. "They're holding on to things that are long since past. It's almost like a religion."
There are competing theories about the defeat of Amendment 2, the measure that would have taken "colored children" and segregated schools out of Alabama's constitution. One says latent, persistent racism was to blame; another says voters are suspicious of all constitutional amendments; and a third says it was not about race but about taxes.
The amendment had two main parts: the removal of the separate-schools language and the removal of a passage -- inserted in the 1950s in an attempt to counter the Brown v. Board of Education ruling against segregated public schools -- that said Alabama's constitution does not guarantee a right to a public education. Leading opponents, such as Alabama Christian Coalition President John Giles, said they did not object to removing the passage about separate schools for "white and colored children." But, employing an argument that was ridiculed by most of the state's newspapers and by legions of legal experts, Giles and others said guaranteeing a right to a public education would have opened a door for "rogue" federal judges to order the state to raise taxes to pay for improvements in its public school system.
The argument plays to Alabama's primal fear of federal control, a fear born of years of resentment over U.S. courts' ordering the desegregation of schools and the creation of black-majority legislative districts.
"Activists on the bench know no bounds," Giles said. "It's a trial lawyer's dream."
Giles was aided by a virtually unparalleled Alabama celebrity in his battle against the amendment, distributing testimonials from former chief justice Roy Moore, whose fame was sealed in 2003 when he defied a federal court order to remove a two-ton granite Ten Commandments monument from the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court. They were joined by former Moore aide Tom Parker, who handed out miniature Confederate flags this fall during his successful campaign for a seat on the Alabama Supreme Court.
Arguing that the amendment could lead to higher taxes is a potent strategy in Alabama, which is one of the nation's most lightly taxed states and which resoundingly rejected a record $1.2 billion tax increase proposed last year by Gov. Bob Riley (R), a conservative, to pay for school improvements and lessen the tax burden on the poor. But many blacks view the Amendment 2 opponents' tax pitch as a smoke screen.
As the vote results sink in, the deacons and the Bible-toting ladies at the Bethel church here have spoken of dark conspiracies, of sinister agendas. They speak from experience.
Vertia Killings, 72, was riding on a bus that had to be rerouted because of the commotion at the University of Alabama on the day Wallace -- who eventually renounced his segregationist past -- made his stand. Her father, Benny Mack, paid a $45 poll tax and "ate a little less" because of it, she said. Others chose to eat instead of vote.
Killings does not see the amendment's defeat as a matter of mere symbolism, even though Alabama's constitutional ban on integrated schools was trumped -- then and now -- by federal law. She has watched school testing results with growing uneasiness.
Black students in Alabama have struggled on some national tests, with 73 percent of black eighth-graders rated below basic competency in math, compared with 32 percent of white eighth-graders. Killings also frets about Alabama schools -- just as schools in many other parts of the country -- steadfastly resegregating. This phenomenon, which is getting increased attention among national education experts, is attributed to a kaleidoscope of factors, including the suburban migration of white families, private school expansion and the rising popularity of home schooling among white conservatives.
"It seems like we're having a reversal," Killings said.
It matters not at all to Killings and her friends that the amendment's opponents say they want to remove the segregated-schools portion of the constitution but cannot abide by guaranteeing a public education and fear mandates for higher education taxes. The people who are most affected by poorly funded schools are the same people who were affected in another era by poll taxes: poor blacks and poor whites.
"I don't know but a few black folks who can afford to send their kids to private school," said Charles Steele Jr., a former Democratic member of the Alabama legislature who lives here and is national vice president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.
This is not the first time that Steele has tangled with Alabama's constitution, a gigantic document that has more than 740 amendments and more than 310,000 words, making it the world's longest, at nearly 40 times the length of the U.S. Constitution. Four years ago, voters repealed a constitutional amendment banning interracial marriage.
The state constitution, which most historians agree was written to protect large landowners and to disenfranchise blacks, is so riddled with antiquated wording that some high school students in Birmingham make an annual trip to the city library for a project known as the search for "the loony laws."
Yet the constitution, with its racist past and its racist present, only grows. On Nov. 2, it was amended three times -- numbers 743, 744 and 745.
Giles has said he would support taking out the passage about separate schools for "white and colored children" as long as the part about not guaranteeing a right to an education is kept.
Ken Guin, the Democratic House majority leader who wrote Amendment 2, is talking about trying again. Next time, he said, he might do it Giles's way.
Interesting, this is something of which I had no idea. Also interesting to hear that many blacks also support these things. Those blacks have more sense then a lot of white idiots out there.
That must be quite a slap in the face to those who seek to destroy our culture.
People in North Alabama are generally pretty politically correct. Most of the people in my area are actually immigrants from up North and carry the typical political identity that you'd associate with that. But I think things are drastically different in the lower three-fourths or so of the state.
I am glad that I haven't contributed to Stormfront again. Almost everybody there posting about it is doing their typical cluster gang garbage on Darby now trying to get him to quit representing Alabama whites. That sucks. After all the crap I went through in black schools here they want to take the one dude that is standing up for the younger kids that are going through this now? What right do they even imagine they have to do that? Stormfronters deserve whatever they get from the system for trying to stop the only person that wants to stand up for the white kids in Alabama. I used to take Stormfronters with a grain of salt thinking they just didn't understand but this is absurd. Every gangbeating or rape in my hometown is now on their hands just as much as any semitic media. They don't have any god damned right to try to derail us from having somebody that would stand up for us.
If they do not like the dude they should just shut the hell up. He's running for Alabama, and as an actual resident, I want him to be Attorney General.
Jake Featherston
05-20-2006, 03:25 PM
I am glad that I haven't contributed to Stormfront again. Almost everybody there posting about it is doing their typical cluster gang garbage on Darby now trying to get him to quit representing Alabama whites. That sucks. After all the crap I went through in black schools here they want to take the one dude that is standing up for the younger kids that are going through this now? What right do they even imagine they have to do that? Stormfronters deserve whatever they get from the system for trying to stop the only person that wants to stand up for the white kids in Alabama. I used to take Stormfronters with a grain of salt thinking they just didn't understand but this is absurd. Every gangbeating or rape in my hometown is now on their hands just as much as any semitic media. They don't have any god damned right to try to derail us from having somebody that would stand up for us.
If they do not like the dude they should just shut the hell up. He's running for Alabama, and as an actual resident, I want him to be Attorney General.
I don't spend much time over at Stormfront, but I'd have naturally assumed he'd have a lot of support over there. Can you briefly encapsulize the nature of their objections?
Daniel Shays
05-20-2006, 05:52 PM
I don't spend much time over at Stormfront, but I'd have naturally assumed he'd have a lot of support over there. Can you briefly encapsulize the nature of their objections?
Evidently he has two half-Chinese children. Reminds me of Chris Simcox and his mulatto.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=295393
He should still receive support, for chrissakes, mixed chinese couples were pro-segregation in Alabama and their children went to White schools. Even if he loses it is great to educate the public on the HoloHoax.
Some SF'ers support him, others do not.
I don't spend much time over at Stormfront, but I'd have naturally assumed he'd have a lot of support over there. Can you briefly encapsulize the nature of their objections?
Yeah they don't like him because his daughters are half-Chinese. If you want, I can find the link for you.
Anchorage Activist
05-21-2006, 09:52 AM
Don't mean to steal your thunder, Hund, but here's the link (I was just checking out the thread an hour ago):
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=295393
Seems like opinion's almost evenly split. April Gaede appears to be his strongest supporter. Hey, if the guy wants to take down the SPLC, expose the Holocaust racket and get serious about getting rid of illegals, I'd vote for him even if he was married to a Borg.:p
Evidently he has two half-Chinese children. Reminds me of Chris Simcox and his mulatto.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=295393
He should still receive support, for chrissakes, mixed chinese couples were pro-segregation in Alabama and their children went to White schools. Even if he loses it is great to educate the public on the HoloHoax.
Some SF'ers support him, others do not.
I am in near total agreement with what you say. I don't have problems--nor have even heard of anybody in my entire lifetime having problems--with Eurasians. These people who want the typical Alabama cog that will sacrifice the white kids in this generation to the blacks like they did in my generation because of two kids--who are probably nice as hell and won't hurt anybody in their entire lives--are about the biggest anti-white scum I can imagine. Back when I was a kid in these Alabama schools David Duke was the only person standing up for me in the political process. Now for this generation of Alabama kids its Darby and I hate anybody who tries to impede their having representation just for once in their lives.
Don't mean to steal your thunder, Hund, but here's the link (I was just checking out the thread an hour ago):
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=295393
Seems like opinion's almost evenly split. April Gaede appears to be his strongest supporter. Hey, if the guy wants to take down the SPLC, expose the Holocaust racket and get serious about getting rid of illegals, I'd vote for him even if he was married to a Borg.:p
Thanks AA. In the earlier part I know it was pretty heavily anti-Darby but maybe I should have read it again before I posted to see if it had evened out. I'll check it out; thanks again.
Anchorage Activist
05-21-2006, 10:28 AM
It probably looks "anti-Darby" because those who are against him posted multiple times, whereas his supporters, with the exception of April Gaede, didn't post more than once or twice on the thread.
I also counted those who wouldn't send him money but would vote for him nonetheless as supporters.
Using that criteria, I counted 19 separate individuals for and 17 against, with several non-committeds.
Olin D. Johnston
05-21-2006, 10:32 AM
This guy is an idiot, he should just shut his trap about the holocaust. When he brings it up he's simply refreshing it in people's minds. I'm sure he is the SPLC's dream candidate. I wouldn't believe anything he says, he's just a race mixing nutjob seeking attention.
Anchorage Activist
05-21-2006, 10:49 AM
With 23 Holocaust museums in the United States and Bush having named this Jewish Heritage Month, I don't see how the Holocaust could possibly be more refreshed than it is now.:p
I think the SPLC looks upon him more as a nightmare than a dream. Check this report:
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/hatewatch/item.jsp?hid=1013
Voting for him is more an act of defiance than anything else. It's a way to show the elite that we've completely rejected the diversity transplant.
Starr
05-21-2006, 06:10 PM
This guy is an idiot, he should just shut his trap about the holocaust. When he brings it up he's simply refreshing it in people's minds. I'm sure he is the SPLC's dream candidate. I wouldn't believe anything he says, he's just a race mixing nutjob seeking attention.
Since he doesn't seem to be a "hollywood nazi" type, I would have to disagree that he is the SPLC's dream candidate. But, yes, it would have been better if he would have left the holocaust denial stuff on the back burner. And while his racemixing is not a good thing, that, at least, IMO is outweighed by the fact that he is an openly pro-white candidate(and I am not one that likes to give passes to race-mixers) How many of those exist? Even if he does not win anything, which he probably won't, he still will cause some people to think. And pro-white messages definitely have the potential, at this time, to recieve some support.
Daniel Shays
05-21-2006, 06:36 PM
But, yes, it would have been better if he would have left the holocaust denial stuff on the back burner.
False.
He was never going to win, he did a good thing by drawing attention to the hoax. For instance, Duke should run for President, not because he'd win but because he'd help awaken people.
Starr
05-21-2006, 06:42 PM
False.
He was never going to win, he did a good thing by drawing attention to the hoax.
My problem with it is mostly that by denying the holocaust and especially by making it such an important part of his message, he is only giving certain people what they need to attack him, without much of a benefit since the holocaust is not something that a lot of people can relate to or care much about.
Anchorage Activist
05-21-2006, 10:56 PM
My problem with it is mostly that by denying the holocaust and especially by making it such an important part of his message, he is only giving certain people what they need to attack him, without much of a benefit since the holocaust is not something that a lot of people can relate to or care much about.
I would agree with the highlighted parts of your post. Many more white people have been robbed, raped, mugged, and scammed by blacks than by Jews. The racial issue is the entree into their minds and hearts.
However, our mission, as racially-conscious whites, isn't merely motivation, but also education. The Holocaust racket has been used as a role model for both emotional and financial extortion by so many other advocacy groups. The gay rights lobby continues to overestimate the percentage of gays in this country. The 10% figure is just as sacred to them as the 6 million figure is to Organized Jewry (discussed further here (http://alaskapride.blogspot.com/2006/03/ten-percent-myth.html)). Both figures are equally and mindlessly regurgitated by pre-programmed media squirrels.
Even non-racial lobbies like the anti-smoking zealots use the same tricks. Groups like the American Cancer Society and the American Lung Association (glorified PACs masquerading as "health" lobbies) are constantly fulminating about the "social costs" of smoking, but neglect to mention that smokers not only pay most of those costs through increased targeted taxation, but also by paying more for health and life insurance (life insurance commericals on T.V. quote rates specifically for non-smokers, which implies that there are higher rates for smokers). These groups have a vested financial interest in exaggerating the problem and censoring contrasting information because it keeps the financial spigot wide open.
So while we don't want to run around foaming at the mouth shrieking "Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust" all the time, once we've got people's attention on the race question, then it is appropriate to introduce them to the Jewish Question, to illustrate not only how Organized Jewry benefits from setting the non-whites at our throats, but how they use the Holocaust racket to ratchet up the guilt meter.
Starr
05-22-2006, 12:50 AM
So while we don't want to run around foaming at the mouth shrieking "Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust" all the time, once we've got people's attention on the race question, then it is appropriate to introduce them to the Jewish Question, to illustrate not only how Organized Jewry benefits from setting the non-whites at our throats, but how they use the Holocaust racket to ratchet up the guilt meter.
I couldn't agree more with everything you have said. The highlighted part being very much where my thinking is. The Jewish question is slighly more complex and not something that many people can automatically see having an immediate affect on their life. The Jewish question is something that is better discussed with someone who is already, at least, somewhat racially aware or has some concerns. No one notices or cares that there is a disease until they take notice of the symptoms. And with a lot of people, something like the holocaust is simply an "event" that took place over 60 years ago, meanwhile their towns are getting browner by the day.
but how they use the Holocaust racket to ratchet up the guilt meter.
And this is the major potential flaw I can see in what I said. Even though people don't sit around thinking about the holocaust every minute of the day, they do have an immediate association in their mind between any kind of racial thinking and the holocaust. The Jews handled that one expertly.
B-Pep
05-22-2006, 01:43 AM
Darby's public outcry against the hollowcost lie was a work of pure genius.
If this guy was just another "redneck" paying lip-service to segregation, he wouldn't of gotten any media attention nor would he have gotten votes. But when the media heard his utter BLASPHEMY, he made world headlines. With no money, platform to have his voice heard, and just measly ideals the media outrage will give him more votes than he could've ever imagined.
The way Darby has handled the situation with his mixed-race children is admirable. He did not lie nor hide his children, he admits what he did and doesn't care. Although I do not condone race mixing, Asian genes are some of the only ones European genes are dominant over, meaning his Eurasian children probably look like they're mostly white anyway, and if they marry a white man the Asian genes will probably be eliminated.
His brave stance against the zionist occupation of Alabama is what I admire. He has my full support.
Sulla the Dictator
05-22-2006, 04:50 AM
The Holocaust has been established as fact on this board. Formally.
Ahknaton
05-22-2006, 05:12 AM
The Holocaust has been established as fact on this board. Formally.
Only by default. Kind of takes the edge of your victory doesn't it? :p
Gorilla
05-22-2006, 05:18 AM
Although I do not condone race mixing, Asian genes are some of the only ones European genes are dominant over, meaning his Eurasian children probably look like they're mostly white anyway, and if they marry a white man the Asian genes will probably be eliminated.
This isn't true, from what I've seen. Unless of course we're the ancestors to the asians. Many Iraqis look slighly asian, from the mongols, and the rape was not on a mass scale.
Feel our Thunder jewish parasite
All your hopes turn to ashes
How does it feel "chosen" scum
Our weapons dripped in your filthy blood
The hammer falls on Zion
Hahahaha :p
The jews are parasites! http://thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7352
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/9-11 Picture8 (sotower).jpg
ROFL
Jake Featherston
05-22-2006, 08:39 AM
The Holocaust has been established as fact on this board. Formally.
Yes, the Nazis systematically exterminated several hundred thousand Jews, and a few hundred thousand more died of typhus and the like during their wartime internment (possibly as many as a million or two total, though the numbers on Jewish demographics don't seem to indicate a loss on quite that scale). Big deal. Hell, good for the Nazis! Who can blame them? I'd do the job myself, were I in a position to do so. And I wish I were.
Sulla the Dictator
05-22-2006, 09:08 AM
Yes, the Nazis systematically exterminated several hundred thousand Jews, and a few hundred thousand more died of typhus and the like during their wartime internment (possibly as many as a million or two total, though the numbers on Jewish demographics don't seem to indicate a loss on quite that scale). Big deal. Hell, good for the Nazis! Who can blame them? I'd do the job myself, were I in a position to do so. And I wish I were.
Actually we've established that nearly a million people were killed at one camp alone. Thats established fact here on the Phora. As to the rest of that nonsense, make sure to put that on your fliers.
Gorilla
05-22-2006, 09:24 AM
Who can blame them? I'd do the job myself, were I in a position to do so. And I wish I were.
Nazi racial supremacy was directed at the chews during the nazi era as a consequence of racially supremecist ideas, namely, that the chews were inferior. Germany at that time only had a large foreign population of European chews, askenazim, primarily, and as a consequence of this, the policies and propaganda of the time were directed in such a direction as to solve the percieved problem. Americans have mexicans, blacks, und to mention the trash element to dispose of, assuming they have become 'nazi'. There's no reason to be stuck on the chews, unless of course they're parasitic, which I'm almost convinced of.
Jake Featherston
05-23-2006, 08:48 PM
Actually we've established that nearly a million people were killed at one camp alone. Thats established fact here on the Phora.
On planet Earth, however....
As to the rest of that nonsense, make sure to put that on your fliers.
Nah. That's when we make with the subtlety.
Starr
05-24-2006, 06:16 AM
Bring in Al Sharpton:
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. May 22, 2006 (AP)— Alabama Democrats should get rid of a candidate who denies the Holocaust and another who has advocated killing illegal immigrants, activist Al Sharpton said Monday.(no white activists allowed, black activists like sharton are perfectly acceptable, however.)
While state party officials say they are powerless to remove the pair from the ballot because the June 6 primary is so close, Sharpton said: "There's no room for these two men in our big tent."
Larry Darby, seeking the party's nomination for attorney general, denies the Holocaust occurred and recently spoke at a gathering of National Vanguard, which describes itself as a "pro-white" organization.
Harry Lyon, who wants to become the Democrats' gubernatorial candidate, has advocated killing illegal immigrants as a way to keep them out of Alabama. :222:
State party chairman Joe Turnham said both are "so far out" that neither has a shot at winning and to attempt to remove them from the ballot at this point could provide ammunition for a legal challenge.
Sharpton, a New York minister and former presidential candidate, said the party's response was inadequate.
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1992681
albion
06-09-2006, 09:04 PM
He was interviewed on Michael Collins Piper on 06/05
M3U
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper/0605/20060515_Mon_Piper.m3u
RAM
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper/0605/20060515_Mon_Piper.ram
This thursday night (10:00 pm, CDT), he will be on for an hour at http://www.currentissues.tv
Alabama Candidate Darby: 'Close Down the SPLC'
Attorney General hopeful says race-hustling group has connection to Oklahoma City Bombing.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/images/teaser/darby_larry_desk.jpg
by Larry Darby (pictured)
Candidate for Alabama Attorney General
WHEN ELECTED Attorney General for the State of Alabama I intend to launch a thorough probe into possible illegal activities by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). I believe a probe will expose evidence sufficient to empty the SPLC's coffers and run them out of the State of Alabama
I have obtained copies of FBI teletypes and other documents in an ongoing federal court case in Utah that indicate Morris Dees (SPLC founder and chief counsel) and the SPLC had prior knowledge of the April 19, 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City and failed to act responsibly, allowing the bombing to go forward, killing 168 persons..............
albion
06-10-2006, 02:40 AM
160,000 voters unfazed by Darby's extreme views
Montgomery Advertiser
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060609/NEWS/606090327/1001
An atheist who believes Jews and illegal immigrants should leave America if the country is to save itself received more votes in this year's primary than Roy Moore and George Wallace Jr. -- household names of Alabama politics. . . .
From the Huntsville Times
I got 52% of the vote in Madison County (Huntsville). American Atheists, led by state director Blair Scott, actively worked against me in Huntsville or the Tennessee Valley. That firm is run by Zionists and disowned me in 2005 because I hosted British historian David Irving at the Prattville Holiday Inn last July. As to the Democratic leader Hinshaw, who is mentioned below, my recollection is that he is one of the Democratic legislators who worked hard to rewrite Alabama’s Constitution. I lobbied to keep Alabama’s Constitution.
Holocaust denier draws 160,000 votes
http://www.al.com/news/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/news/1149844720319270.xml&coll=1
Democrats call AG candidate's strong showing 'embarrassing'
MONTGOMERY - Larry Darby believes that Jews exaggerated the Holocaust, that the country should be all-white and that illegal immigrants should be shot on sight.
Dances with Wolves
06-10-2006, 02:44 AM
160,000 voters unfazed by Darby's extreme views
Montgomery Advertiser
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060609/NEWS/606090327/1001
An atheist who believes Jews and illegal immigrants should leave America if the country is to save itself received more votes in this year's primary than Roy Moore and George Wallace Jr. -- household names of Alabama politics. . . .
From the Huntsville Times
I got 52% of the vote in Madison County (Huntsville). American Atheists, led by state director Blair Scott, actively worked against me in Huntsville or the Tennessee Valley. That firm is run by Zionists and disowned me in 2005 because I hosted British historian David Irving at the Prattville Holiday Inn last July. As to the Democratic leader Hinshaw, who is mentioned below, my recollection is that he is one of the Democratic legislators who worked hard to rewrite Alabama’s Constitution. I lobbied to keep Alabama’s Constitution.
Holocaust denier draws 160,000 votes
http://www.al.com/news/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/news/1149844720319270.xml&coll=1
Democrats call AG candidate's strong showing 'embarrassing'
MONTGOMERY - Larry Darby believes that Jews exaggerated the Holocaust, that the country should be all-white and that illegal immigrants should be shot on sight.
He would have won if he had shut up about the holohoax, and just concentrated on the browning of America issue. Once in power, he could have dealt the death blow. WNs. They'all neva lern.
WFHermans
06-10-2006, 08:49 AM
You're so smart, you should run for office yourself.
Jake Featherston
06-13-2006, 04:06 PM
He would have won if he had shut up about the holohoax, and just concentrated on the browning of America issue...WNs. They'all neva lern.
Based on the controversial and forthright nature of his campaign (which was far more radical than David Duke's 1991 run for Governor of Louisiana), and his previous status as an unknown who'd never held any position within the political structure, I would say his capturing 44% of the vote, and thus establishing himself as a substantial figure on the statewide level down in Alabama, ought not be interpreted as a defeat per se, but rather as an achievement of some note which he will quite hopefully build upon in the next 2-4 years. I say this particularly in light of the fact that despite my sadly limited knowledge of the demographics of my native state, I feel confident in saying 44% of the Alabama Democratic primary vote must constitute at least 60% of the White Democrat vote, and quite probably more* (Fade is no doubt a little more up on such figures than I am, and can presumably confirm the approximate accuracy of my estimate, which I suspect is rather conservative).
Considering how Alabama is synonymous with the notion of "the Bible Belt," and the fact Mr. Darby is an active and outspoken Atheist activist, he might well have been able to win the Democratic Primary despite having stated his quite reasonable belief that the "Holocaust" has been so greatly exaggerated as to constitute something of a farce, were it not for the weighty handicap of being described early and often, by the Alabama dominant press, as a prominent Atheist.
*The SPLC is characteristically (and laughably) suggesting/lying Alabama voters had no idea for whom they were voting, yet I feel confident everyone here, at least those who've spent their lives in North America, can readily imagine just how vigorously the Alabama t.v., radio and print media were in making it crystal clear just who the good people of Alabama were not supposed to cast their ballot for (I imagine virtually every single story pertaining to Mr. Darby included the word "hate," for example). I have no doubt that several thousand ignorant darkies did vote unknowingly for the White National Socialist-sounding policies espoused by Mr. Darby, seeing as how nearly all Niggers who do bother to vote do so as registered Democrats. There are, after all, several very good reasons why the political leadership of Alabama was so reluctant to permit Blacks to exercise their 15th Amendment rights during the 1960s (I support the repeal of the 15th Amendment, naturally). One of those reasons is in order to prevent the distortion of the electoral process that is an inevitable outgrowth of permitting bestial savages to perform what must be, to them, the alien and peculiar ritual of voting.
Jofreidr_1488
06-17-2006, 10:51 AM
He was never going to win, he did a good thing by drawing attention to the hoax. For instance, Duke should run for President, not because he'd win but because he'd help awaken people.
Actually Dr. Duke HAS run for President in the past:
In 1988, he ran in the Democratic Party primary for President of the United States. After a dismal showing in the Democratic primaries, he appeared on many state ballots as the nominee of the Populist Party and received approximately 25,000 votes in the 1988 general election.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke
In 1984, the Populist Party name was revived by some extreme right activists including Willis Carto. The party's 1984 presidential nominee, Olympic medalist and ordained minister Bob Richards and running mate Maureen Salaman carried 66,324 votes. This party became the electoral vehicle for the right-wing Presidential campaigns of former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke in 1988, and of former Green Beret officer Bo Gritz in 1992, but was defunct by 1996.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populist_Party_of_America
It would be nice if he would consider another run! (I like Duke even though he is a christian, but luckily he only gives lip service to the alien semitic religion so I can overlook this aspect.)
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.