View Full Version : A Frank Discussion of Jewish Group Dynamics
Starr
07-06-2006, 09:23 PM
decent article:
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=603#more-603
You won’t hear any non-Jewish critics of Israel on the radio, television or on Moveon.com – they have no voice, no platform, not in the mainstream media anyway
I do not agree with this 100%. You don't hear it real often and it has to be done in a certain(lefty, "humanitarian") way, but it does exist and I have heard it, especially on the radio.
Thomas777
07-06-2006, 10:29 PM
Duke is a really, really, odd character IMO. I was never a supporter of his, but he really lost me when he began penning essays such as "Russia: the key to White survival?" What I mean by that is that Duke is educated, and he has dedicated his life to racialist research, advocacy, etc. Its a bit naiive and sort of vulgarian for him to be touting this "big tent" sort of WNism that tends to appeal to Alex Linder types. Duke should stick to mobilizing his constituency: American, Southern, White folks...not indulging in ill-conceived op-eds about global politik.
That and I actually read "Jewish supremicism" in ebook format. Now, I expected a read along the lines of "the Holocaust industry" by Finklestein (a very good book I might add). Instead, what I got was some poorly written, totally unresearched, tome where Duke is tossing around anecdotes about shitty things Jews have done that he personally does not like. No citation, no real thesis, nothing. Duke either really half assed that book or he cannot write worth a damn.
Either way, he is interesting to follow, so thanx for sharing.
Empress Cheesatine
07-07-2006, 01:05 AM
He's no longer a local politician, so why would he stick to his old constituency? Russia is probably the most awakened white country right now, certainly the most receptive to his ideas.
Pan-Ayranism is the way to go, unless you are only concerned about preserving a narrow constituency of white southerners, of course.
I dont own Jewish Supremacism, but I recall reading the preface on to it on his website, and it is indeed sourced. http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=129
Thomas777
07-07-2006, 01:07 AM
He's no longer a local politician, so why would he stick to his old constituency? Russia is probably the most awakened white country right now, certainly the most receptive to his ideas.
Pan-Ayranism of one sort is the way to go, unless you are only concerned about preserving a narrow constituency of white southerners, of course.
I think there is much to praise in Russia right now. That said, I am an American and it does not improve the lot of the Republic to pen manifestos about how the Russians are our "racial brothers" in some abstract capacity.
Also, the American South is not a narrow constituency.
Ixtab
07-07-2006, 11:27 PM
That and I actually read "Jewish supremicism" in ebook format. Now, I expected a read along the lines of "the Holocaust industry" by Finklestein (a very good book I might add). Instead, what I got was some poorly written, totally unresearched, tome where Duke is tossing around anecdotes about shitty things Jews have done that he personally does not like. No citation, no real thesis, nothing. Duke either really half assed that book or he cannot write worth a damn.That was my impression of the book as well.
WFHermans
07-07-2006, 11:47 PM
The elctronic version you read had no footnotes, but the paper book has.
harjit
07-08-2006, 12:15 AM
I think there is much to praise in Russia right now. That said, I am an American and it does not improve the lot of the Republic to pen manifestos about how the Russians are our "racial brothers" in some abstract capacity.
In the end you'll hopefully realize that the entire notion of "racial brothership" is itself spurious and empty, an abstraction that misleads.
In the end you'll hopefully realize that the entire notion of "racial brothership" is itself spurious and empty, an abstraction that misleads.
that's rich coming from an Asian, are you hindu, muslim, gujarati????
if it's the case you know full well you people are tighter than chocolate bars stuck together with glue
I do not agree with this 100%. You don't hear it real often and it has to be done in a certain(lefty, "humanitarian") way, but it does exist and I have heard it, especially on the radio.
only a very watered down, softly softly criticsm followed with a group hug and offers of lunch and flowers at the next meeting.
it's a joke, these people control america. someone has to be blind not to realise this.
:thanks:
Starr
07-08-2006, 01:40 AM
only a very watered down, softly softly criticsm followed with a group hug and offers of lunch and flowers at the next meeting.
it's a joke, these people control america. someone has to be blind not to realise this.
:thanks:
No disagreements with your second line, but I have heard some rather harsh criticisms especially on the more left-wing type radio shows. It is also somewhat harsh on certain college campuses from what I hear. The extraordinarily left-wing "one world" "humanitarian" crap that is promoted by so many jews does come back to bite them in the ass this way. How could it not, honestly?
harjit
07-08-2006, 07:57 AM
that's rich coming from an Asian, are you hindu, muslim, gujarati????
Bengali Hindu but grew up in Canada.
if it's the case you know full well you people are tighter than chocolate bars stuck together with glue
Do you mean Indians living abroad forming various communities and associations?
If that is what you mean it is much more a cultural thing than a racial thing. New immigrants in particular derive a sense of comfort in being around people with the same culture and language. It is similar Italian-American or German-Canadian groups. It is not about genotype.
A more direct example, I live in Japan and we English-speaking Westerners tend to cluster together. Most are white.
LeoAlbus
07-08-2006, 10:20 AM
I've read articles, swedish ones, published within the most read magazines, actual and detailed criticism of Israel's policies etc.
From time to time, on the Debate-show (swedish programme), Israel-Palestine issues are brought up, with a panel of Israel-sympathizers on one end and Palestinian-sympathizers on the other.
The rather elaborate concept of this encompassing, global Hive-mind in blind jewish interests, purported by David Duke for example, should be served initially with grains of salt.
Basil Fawlty
07-08-2006, 10:37 AM
I've read articles, swedish ones, published within the most read magazines, actual and detailed criticism of Israel's policies etc.
From time to time, on the Debate-show (swedish programme), Israel-Palestine issues are brought up, with a panel of Israel-sympathizers on one end and Palestinian-sympathizers on the other.
The rather elaborate concept of this encompassing, global Hive-mind in blind jewish interests, purported by David Duke for example, should be served initially with grains of salt.The situation they are describing applies to the US. In Europe we do have public criticisms of the Zionist entity but over there, they do not.
WFHermans
07-08-2006, 10:38 AM
Those "fair and balanced" panels usually have a rabid zionist on one side and a moderate zionist on the other side.
LeoAlbus
07-08-2006, 10:44 AM
The situation they are describing applies to the US. In Europe we do have public criticisms of the Zionist entity but over there, they do not.
In essence, I've never been able to figure the US satisfyingly.
It seems to be a country that house every possible direction in its extreme, during the same time.
Sometimes it's divided, with every state being its own country and having their own customs more or less, then suddenly a related matter is encompassed over all the US.
Hard to explain anway...
- Hans
Basil Fawlty
07-08-2006, 10:57 AM
In essence, I've never been able to figure the US satisfyingly.
It seems to be a country that house every possible direction in its extreme, during the same time.
Sometimes it's divided, with every state being its own country and having their own customs more or less, then suddenly a related matter is encompassed over all the US.
Hard to explain anway...
- HansIts really very simple why there is no objective reporting of the Palestine situation. Jewish ownership and control of the media and the power of AIPAC, ADL and dozens of other interest groups who have refined bullying down to a science.
LeoAlbus
07-08-2006, 11:30 AM
Its really very simple why there is no objective reporting of the Palestine situation. Jewish ownership and control of the media and the power of AIPAC, ADL and dozens of other interest groups who have refined bullying down to a science.
Well I've familiar with that, though isn't the US part of a love-triangle?
Seeing as Saudia Arabia has invested plenty of time and money in corporates, selling the oil etc to the US, while the US invests in Israel.
I recall the incident during the 70'ts, when Saudi Arabia put halt to the oil-exports which caused a widespread shortage quite swiftly, there is a desire and at times dependance of the US to stay sober with israelians as well as with a lot of arabians.
On one end, they're putting up guns for the sake of religious context...:bitchfight:
On the other end they're putting them down for the sake of capitalism.
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.