![]() |
|
|||||||
| Religion vs. Science Clash between the physical and metaphysical. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200709.htm#20070919a
Geological Dates Adjust Catastrophically to Evolutionary Assumptions 09/19/2007 Pick a date for the rise of a land mass: 3 million years or 30 million years. Either one will work, depending on the current evolutionary assumptions, if one is to follow the logic of an article on the Discovery Channel website. Here’s how it began: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/0...19-502-ak-0000 Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(Commentary) Caught in the act! You thought geologists knew about the dates of mountains, canyons and plateaus, didn’t you? Here you just saw them make an order-of-magnitude adjustment to an accepted age just to keep the apeman-to-human myth intact. This huge fudging operation was blessed by none other than the Geological Society of America. Now you know why the “Related Links” at the end of the article lists a human evolution website, and “PBS explores human evolution,” and “More on hominids from the BBC.” Do you really think for a million nanoseconds that these geologists were unbiased seekers of the truth, converging independently on the actual date of this plateau by strict adherence to empiricism? No; Charlie is backstage calling the shots, and they’re all in this racket together. If you don’t believe it yet, look at a summary of the GSA paper published by EurekAlert: Quote:
The only bright side of this article is a subtle confirmation of creationist geology. The creationists have been saying for years that the Grand Canyon was formed rapidly by catastrophic processes. We’ve seen the secular geology crowd slowly coming around (09/16/2005, 07/02/2002) and dropping their age estimates like a rock in free fall (from 100 million to 5 million to less than a million). Now, this story alluded to evidence that the “Grand Canyon of Africa,” the Nile Gorge, was not formed by uniformitarian gradualism, but by catastrophism as well. Shove aside their moyboy lingo (09/16/2005 commentary footnote), because it is worthless. They weren’t there, they don’t know, and their ulterior motives are driving the show. Last edited by Petr : 09-20-2007 at 03:06 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't really understand this creationist business. Is it your position that dinosaur fossils are fabricated, or that they're convenient rock formations, or that they are actually the bones of creatures who used to exist at the same time of human beings and, by some miracle, have fossilized?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Let Kent Hovind explain! http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=2 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its a riot to listen to that madman
![]() Well..if the Lord made the world in 6 days and there were Dinosaurs then obviously Adam a Eve must have seen them. ROFL
__________________
"Murió de los que no saben morir; muerte docta; hasta muriendo fue maestro, pues enseñó a morir de vergüenza a los que viven de miedo. Enterraron con su cuerpo el valor y la experiencia militar de España" "Died one of those who did not know how to; Wise death; even in dieing he was a master, for he taught to die of shame those who live in fear. With his body they burried the bravery and military experience of Spain" Epitafio de Quevedo a Ambrosio de Spinola |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What's even funnier is his Wiki article. He has serious problems. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_hovind |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|