Harvesting Racialism

[Fade the Butcher]

I have written in the past about my belief in the primacy of ideas over matter, how ideas can infect an organism and structure its actions, how inflicting certain ideas upon populations can be conceptualized as an act of violence. Ideas are more efficient than individual actions. A single good idea, for example, can change the behavior of millions of people. Anyway, I have been giving this a considerable amount of thought lately and have begun to sketch out ways to implement this theory on a practical level. It would involve registering on various liberal and conservative websites and forums under various pseudonyms and cloaking our intentions under ostensible identities. The goal would be to structure the discourse that goes on there towards racialist ends through various means; to encourage a more receptive environment to our ideas if nothing else.

The racialist information terrorist could conceptualize himself as a farmer and the various actors on the websites as his crop. He would plant seeds of doubt in the minds of those he is targeting, cultivate favorable traits while discouraging unfavorable ones, and viciously critique the most degenerate elements under the disguise of various ideological frameworks that are not explicitly racialist. It would be especially important to plant the right ideas in the host subject and to undermine the deep structure of ideas that underpin anti-racist ideology. The infected host would work out the ultimate logic of such ideas on his own accord (with guidance along the way) and his sentiments could be manipulated in various ways to promote our ends.

[Fade the Butcher]

Update: I'm already experimenting with this approach on various websites.

[Janus]

It works; I have done it on several message boards.

[Fade the Butcher]

Check this out.

We didn't invade and occupy Afghanistan to promote women's rights. Honestly, you sound like a bleeding heart liberal. Jesus Christ. You sound like Jimmy Carter! Liberals want to use the military to promote "human rights" abroad (i.e., Somalia, Kosovo, Haiti, East Timor etc) when no clear U.S. interest is at stake. Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn are always going on about this. This was essentially the foreign policy of the Clinton administration.

In reality, we have always supported bad guys around the world. The Turks have killed more Kurds than Saddam ever did, but Turkey is one of our closest allies in the region. You mention Reagan above, but Reagan backed Saddam in his war with Iran and the mujahideen in Afghanistan. We back the Saudis today, not to mention Musharraf in Pakistan and the Israelis who are anything but nice to the Palestinians. The Soviet Union was a threat to the United States and that is why we went to such lengths to contain the Soviet Union.

BELARUS, however, is not. Belarus is just some backward third world country most Americans have never even heard of. Yeah. It's governed by a dictator, but so what. Belarus is not a threat to the United States. Chad isn't a threat to the United States. Ethiopia isn't a threat to the United States. The only people who would advocate U.S. intervention in Belarus are bleeding heart liberals obsessed with human rights, not American interests.

[Ahknaton]

Originally Posted by Deconstructionist

The infected host would work out the ultimate logic of such ideas on his own accord (with guidance along the way) and his sentiments could be manipulated in various ways to promote our ends.

An advantage of this approach is that the subject feels that his/her ideas are "their own", and therefore offers less resistance than if they were given an explicitly formulised racialist ideology and told to follow it.

I think it would be beneficial to sketch out some concrete examples of arguments and ideas that are "antecedents" to racialist thought. In my opinion the following are important:

- "Soft" Biological determinism. i.e. the genetic quality of a human population determines the quality of society that is posisble. An environment that encourages virtuous attitudes is also necessary of course. It is possible to argue that genetics heavily influences intelligence whilst steering clear of racialist themes by concentrating on variation between individuals. The subject can make the necessary leap from individual to collective on their own.

- Rejection of cultural universalism. This issue can be raised effectively with leftists by arguing that Westerners have no right to impose their values on indigenous cultures. Once this has been accepted then it follows that Western cultures and traditions also have unique attributes that are worth preserving. An alternative strategy is to profess support for Israel as a nationalist ethno-state and extrapolate the principle to Western nations.

- Railing against the homogenity and fakeness of modern culture. This can be extrapolated to opposing the mixing of races into a mass of interchangeable workers and consumers under a globalist/capitalist world order.

Can anyone else provide examples of using this strategy?

[Fade the Butcher]

LOL. This is fun.

It's insane. You would think securing our borders would have been our NUMBER ONE PRIORITY after 9/11. But no. The globalists will stop at nothing to destroy our national sovereignty. They have been at it for years now. Erasing our border with Mexico is an essential step towards their goal of a "North American Union" like the EU. They surrendered the power of Congress to formulate our trade policies to the WTO under Clinton.

[Fade the Butcher]

Originally Posted by Ahknaton

An advantage of this approach is that the subject feels that his/her ideas are "their own", and therefore offers less resistance than if they were given an explicitly formulised racialist ideology and told to follow it.

Exactly. The racial nationalist who poses as a conservative cloaks his true agenda in order to penetrate the defenses of the host group. This allows him to subvert that group from within.

[Fade the Butcher]

Originally Posted by Ahknaton

Can anyone else provide examples of using this strategy?

It would be important to subvert and attack the deep structure of ideas that lend themselves to anti-racism, for example, egalitarianism and humanitarianism, while cultivating at the same time the ideas that lend themselves to racialism, for instance, collectivism and idealism.

[Keystone]

Originally Posted by Deconstructionist

I have written in the past about my belief in the primacy of ideas over matter, how ideas can infect an organism and structure its actions, how inflicting certain ideas upon populations can be conceptualized as an act of violence. Ideas are more efficient than individual actions. A single good idea, for example, can change the behavior of millions of people. Anyway, I have been giving this a considerable amount of thought lately and have begun to sketch out ways to implement this theory on a practical level. It would involve registering on various liberal and conservative websites and forums under various pseudonyms and cloaking our intentions under ostensible identities. The goal would be to structure the discourse that goes on there towards racialist ends through various means; to encourage a more receptive environment to our ideas if nothing else.

The racialist information terrorist could conceptualize himself as a farmer and the various actors on the websites as his crop. He would plant seeds of doubt in the minds of those he is targeting, cultivate favorable traits while discouraging unfavorable ones, and viciously critique the most degenerate elements under the disguise of various ideological frameworks that are not explicitly racialist. It would be especially important to plant the right ideas in the host subject and to undermine the deep structure of ideas that underpin anti-racist ideology. The infected host would work out the ultimate logic of such ideas on his own accord (with guidance along the way) and his sentiments could be manipulated in various ways to promote our ends.

I feel like a bug, dude....

[Die]

May your harvest be fruitful. After all, you will only essentially subvert to your 'cause' what is like yourself ie. budding raciopaths. You are bound by belief. You have demonstrated that I may rule you with an idea.